Advanced Search Results

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Lal Chand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 22, 27, 28, 34, 58(1), 59 and 60; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956 - Rule 36(2), 36(3), 36(4), 36(16), 36(22-A), 36(23), 36(23)(1), 36(23)(2), 36(23-A) and 37(8-B); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 299(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest Contract Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC1326; 1984(1)SCALE690; (1984)3SCC634; [1984]3SCR715; 1984(16)LC722(SC)

in K.P. Chowdhary's, Mulamchand's, Rattan Lal's and Firm Gobardhan Dass's cases, supra, there are provisions in the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Forest Contract Rules framed thereunder for entering into a formal deed between the forest contractor and … as also the defaulted instalments of the licence fee payable in respect of a liquor vend issued under Section 60 of the Punjab Excise Act 1914 ('Act' for short).2. Put very shortly, the essential facts are these. On

Ghatge Patil Transport Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Provi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 20, 29, 44(2), 44(2A), 52, 52(1), 52(2), 52(1A), 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61A to 61F, 62 and 62(2); Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 58A, 58E, 58H and 58H(1); Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 451, 457 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 19(1), 48A, 51A, 300A and 301

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR497

the present petition, the petitioners are challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 52 and 52(1-A) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, as applicable to the State of Maharashtra, hereinafter called as 'the said Act', being violative of Article 19(1)(g) … for the purpose of investigation or inquiry. The petitioners, therefore, moved an application before the competent authority under Section 60 of the said Act, which came to be rejected by the impugned order dated 19th December, 2005. The

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Sri Ram Baboo Kesari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Forest Act - Sections 44(2A); ;Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 20, 20(1), 26, 26(1), 29, 29(1), 29(4), 44(2), 44(2A), 51A, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 54, 55 to 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 69; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 5, 428, 451, 452, 457, 458, 459 and 482; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 19A; ;Border Security Force Act; Evidence Act

Reported in : 1990CriLJ87

Jagdish Khalifa.3. It is not disputed that the seizure was purported to be under Section 52 of the Forest Act, 1927 and a report of seizure was made to the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence on account … interim custody of the sale proceeds.23. Section 59 provides for appeals against orders under Sections 55 to 57. Section 60 of the Act lays down that after order of confiscation under Section 55 or Section 57 on confirmation

Smt. Pratima Ghosh and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention or Damages of Public Property Act, 1934 - Section 3 ; ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 17, 52, 59A to 59G, 60, 62, 63 and 68; ;West Bengal Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1959 - Rule 11; ;Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 401 and 482

Reported in : (2006)2CALLT125(HC),2006(2)CHN586

contending that since the order passed by the learned District Judge in appeal under Section 59D(2) of the Forest Act, 1927, as amended by the W.B. Act 22 of 1988, is final, revision under Section 401 Cr.PC is not … any property or tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles or cattle seized under Section 52. As per provision of Section 60, when an order for confiscation of any property has been passed and appellate Court confirms such order in

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … transit which changes the character of transit fee into a tax, which is not permissible under law. 58 60. After noticing the respective submissions of both parties, we now proceed to consider them in the same seriatum.

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … 2010, etc. -:116. :- of turning out to be a boon will turn out to be a curse." 60. Justice V.R.Krishna Iyer, for himself and for Justice Bhagwati, delivered a concurrent opinion. Constitutional history of Section 31A

Indirabai Narayan Bivalkar, Deceased Through her L.Rs. and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

21 October 1959 entered into with Bivalkar for management of the subject land under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the same was wrongfully and arbitrarily transferred by Forest Department to Revenue Department on its deforestation and … forest” though they may have ceased thereafter to be a “protected forest”. 60. Subsequently, the Maharashtra Private Forest Act came into force on 30 August … Bombay Personal Inam Abolition Act, 1952 (for short, “the Inam Abolition Act”) came to be enacted. Provisions of Sections 4, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 17 are relevant. In the year 1957, village was surveyed and the

State of Maharashtra Vs. Mohammad Shabbir Sheikh NajmuddIn and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 42 and 64; Bombay Transit of Forest Produce (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Rules, 1960 - Rules 3 and 25

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR439; 1999CriLJ4019

Sonawane-driver of the truck were prosecuted for the offence punishable under sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 on the allegations that they were found in possession of forest produce without valid transit pass. The Range … Criminal Case No. 57/96 whereby the present non-applicants 1 and 3 were discharged from the offence punishable under sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act and the property was returned to the complainant i.e. Forest … in the truck, illegally loaded 29 Bija billets of size having girth 60 to 90 cms. The learned Counsel further contended that the accused in

The State Vs. Basanta Kumar Singh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Dharmanagar in Criminal Casc-No. 85 of I960, of the offences Under Sections 33 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927.2. The case against them was that they were-detected extracting firewood illicitly from protected forest on 13-1-60 by … to 4 by the Magistrate, 3rd Class, Dharmanagar in Criminal Casc-No. 85 of I960, of the offences Under Sections 33 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927.2. The case against them was that they were-detected extracting