Advanced Search Results
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Dhanwant Singh
Supreme Court of India
Feb-12-2004
EnvironmentCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 401 and 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 5, 6, 52(A), 52(B), 59, 59(A), 59(B), 59(2), 59(3) and 69; Indian Forest Act (Himachal Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1991; ;Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227
AIR2004SC1636; 2004CriLJ1431; JT2004(2)SC367; 2004(2)SCALE423
judgment dated 13.12.1993 of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Solan, in an appeal under Section 59(2) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (in short the 'Act') as amended by the Indian Forest Act (Himachal Pradesh Second Amendment Act, 1991), (hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra and Etc. Vs. Suja Karan Rabbani and Etc.
Mumbai
Sep-14-1999
Criminal
Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 26(1), 32(1), 52(1), 55(1), 59, 61-A, 61-C, 61-G and 68; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 457; Bombay Forest Rules, 1942; Indian Forest (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984
2000(5)BomCR899; 2000CriLJ664
the protected forest. The Forest Officer, who had seized those cattle under section 52(1) of the Indian Forests Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') also found that those cattle ate and damaged forest produce such as … the judgment dated 20-6-1997 that the Magistrate may pass an order of release of the seized property under section 59 of the Act are not only erroneous but misconceived. In fact, after the insertion of section 61-G in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Krishna Sarkar Vs. Authorises Officer, Jalpaiguri Divisional and ...
Kolkata
Nov-13-1998
Civil
Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Section 59(A)(3) and B(2);; Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227
(1999)1CALLT425(HC)
vehicle of the petitioner along with the tools, forest produce seized under section 59(A) (3) of the Indian Forest Act 1927.2. At about 8.30 p.m. of 17th July, 1992 while the Range Officer, upper Tondu range along with other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raj Homes Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-26-2008
ConstitutionProperty
Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Rules - Rules 1 to 12, 13, 14, 15, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 35 and 36; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 2(1), 58, 58(2), 59, 59(1), 59(2), 59(3), 59(5), 75 to 98, 258 and 258(2); Constitution of India - Article 14; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1954
2009(1)MPHT347(SC); 2008(11)SCALE759; (2008)9SCC500
on any land situated in the areas which are constituted as reserved or protected forests under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (16 of 1927), with reference to use of land for any of the purposes aforesaid shall not be … any non-agricultural purpose is diverted to any agricultural purpose no premium shall be imposed under Sub-section (5) of Section 59 of the Code.14. (1) For the purpose of levy of premium on agricultural land other than the land
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of West Bengal and anr. Vs. Mahua Sarkar
Supreme Court of India
Feb-27-2008
Environment
Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 52(1), 59A, 59A(1), 59A(3), 59B, 59B(1), 59B(2), 59C, 59D, 62, 71A, 71C and 71G; West Bengal Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1959 - Rule 8(1); Indian Forest (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 17; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482
2008AIRSCW176; 2008(3)LH(SC)2027; AIR2008SC1591; 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)437; 2008(56)BLJR1195; (SCSuppl)2008(2)CHN130; [2008(3)JCR6(SC)]; (2008)3MLJ986(SC); 2008(3)SCALE199; 2008(1)LC393(SC);
directed release of vehicle which was seized and confiscated for an alleged violation of the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (in short the 'Act').3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:On 10.2.1999, certain forest officials noticed that … passengers were arrested and forwarded to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalpaiguri. A notice in terms of Section 8(1) of West Bengal Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1959 (in short the Transit Rules') was issued to the … Forest Officer, Wildlife, Division-II, Jalpaiguri who is the Authorised Officer, under Section 59A of the Act as amended by Section 17 of the Indian Forest
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana and ors. Vs. Lal Chand and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-02-1984
Commercial
Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 22, 27, 28, 34, 58(1), 59 and 60; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956 - Rule 36(2), 36(3), 36(4), 36(16), 36(22-A), 36(23), 36(23)(1), 36(23)(2), 36(23-A) and 37(8-B); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 299(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest Contract Rules
AIR1984SC1326; 1984(1)SCALE690; (1984)3SCC634; [1984]3SCR715; 1984(16)LC722(SC)
in K.P. Chowdhary's, Mulamchand's, Rattan Lal's and Firm Gobardhan Dass's cases, supra, there are provisions in the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Forest Contract Rules framed thereunder for entering into a formal deed between the forest contractor and … under Clause (f) the State Government may make rules regulating the manner of holding auctions of liquor shops. Section 59 provides that the Financial Commissioner may, by notification, make rules by Clause (a) to regulate the manufacture, supply,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPushap Raj Vs. State of H.P. and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
May-23-2006
Criminal
Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 51A, 52B, 52, 52(1), 52A, 52A(2), 52B, 59 and 59A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482
2006CriLJ4138,2006(2)ShimLC346
the relevant time was seized on 5th June, 2000 purportedly in terms of Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act 1927. As a sequel to the seizure of this truck and as a prelude to its confiscation under Section … where the order of confiscation made under Section 52-A is set aside or annulled by an order under Section 59 or Section 59-A, be paid to the owner thereof or the person from whom it was seized as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Emerico D'Souza Vs. State through the Deputy Conservator of Forest ...
Mumbai
Jul-08-1994
Criminal
Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 57, 59(A) and 72(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25 and 30
1995(1)BomCR266
the Range Forest Officer of the accused, during the investigation of a forest offence under the Indian Forests Act, 1927, are hit by section 25 or 30 of the Evidence Act. The petitioner is involved in an offence … 30 of the Evidence Act. The petitioner is involved in an offence under section 52 of the Indian Forest Act read with Rule 64 of the G.D.D. Forest Rules, 1964 for possessing illegally forest timber. This transaction involved … 37 of 1992 and Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 1992 under section 59(A) of the Indian Forest Act. The learned Sessions Judge, Panaji, in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. and anr. Vs. Sri Ram Baboo Kesari and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-04-1989
Criminal
Andhra Pradesh Forest Act - Sections 44(2A); ;Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 20, 20(1), 26, 26(1), 29, 29(1), 29(4), 44(2), 44(2A), 51A, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 54, 55 to 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 69; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 5, 428, 451, 452, 457, 458, 459 and 482; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 19A; ;Border Security Force Act; Evidence Act
1990CriLJ87
Jagdish Khalifa.3. It is not disputed that the seizure was purported to be under Section 52 of the Forest Act, 1927 and a report of seizure was made to the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence on account … the seized property. He can, of course, pass orders with respect to interim custody of the sale proceeds.23. Section 59 provides for appeals against orders under Sections 55 to 57. Section 60 of the Act lays down that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAhmadji Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-20-1985
Civil
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 55 and 59
AIR1986MP1
challenging the order ofconfiscation of truck dated 20-12-1982 passed.by the Divisional Forest Officer under Section 52 of Indian Forest Act, 1927.2. The petitioner owned truck No. MPD 4822 which is a 1973 model Tata Mercedese truck. The petitioner … passed by a Magistrate trying the offence at the time of convicting the accused. This is clear from Section 59 which provides for an appeal against the order of confiscation to the Court to which normally the appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »