Advanced Search Results

KamaruddIn N. Shaikh Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 35(3); Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 5; Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 3, 58 and 61; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR209; (1996)98BOMLR159

31st July, 1996. Property - forest land - Section 35 (3) of Indian Forests Act, 1927, Sections 3, 58 and 61 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - Court to decide suit … with forest produce. 'Forest produce' is not defined in the Act but has been defined under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 2(4) reads as under :'2(4) 'forest-produce' includes ---(a) the following whether found in, or brought from, a forest

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Lal Chand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 22, 27, 28, 34, 58(1), 59 and 60; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956 - Rule 36(2), 36(3), 36(4), 36(16), 36(22-A), 36(23), 36(23)(1), 36(23)(2), 36(23-A) and 37(8-B); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 299(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest Contract Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC1326; 1984(1)SCALE690; (1984)3SCC634; [1984]3SCR715; 1984(16)LC722(SC)

in K.P. Chowdhary's, Mulamchand's, Rattan Lal's and Firm Gobardhan Dass's cases, supra, there are provisions in the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Forest Contract Rules framed thereunder for entering into a formal deed between the forest contractor and … as also the defaulted instalments of the licence fee payable in respect of a liquor vend issued under Section 60 of the Punjab Excise Act 1914 ('Act' for short).2. Put very shortly, the essential facts are these. … such deposits by way of security. as he may think fit. Section 58(1) of the Act confers power on the State Government, by notification, to

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Sri Ram Baboo Kesari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Forest Act - Sections 44(2A); ;Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 20, 20(1), 26, 26(1), 29, 29(1), 29(4), 44(2), 44(2A), 51A, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 54, 55 to 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 69; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 5, 428, 451, 452, 457, 458, 459 and 482; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 19A; ;Border Security Force Act; Evidence Act

Reported in : 1990CriLJ87

Jagdish Khalifa.3. It is not disputed that the seizure was purported to be under Section 52 of the Forest Act, 1927 and a report of seizure was made to the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence on account … would suffice to say that the prosecution story takes out the case from the purview of Section 57.21. Section 58 relates to disposal of perishable property. It can be quoted as under :'Procedure as to perishable property seized

Rajiv SarIn and anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 4A, 18(1)(cc), 19(1)(b), 3(10), 8; UP Amendment Act 1978 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ; Indian Forests Act 1927 - Section 36, 37, 84; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 40; Government of India Act. - Section 76, 107(2); Constitution of India. - Article 254, 31(2), 300A; Punjab Act - Section 10

senior counsel appearing for the appellants raised two contentions in the context of the inter-relation of the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the KUZALR Act; firstly, the case of alleged discrimination in as much as the Central Act i.e. … the cases of Navinchandra Mafatlal v. CIT, reported in AIR 1955 SC 58 and State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shanti Lal Shah, reported in (2008) … year 1976 appellants succeeded to the property in question. By a Gazette Notification dated 21st December, 1977 under Section 4-A of the Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as KUZALR

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … of the owner or any other person in any private forest under sub- section (1) of Section 3." 58. The State's submission in support of the Act was that the Act is protected by Article 31A of

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … private parties as well as the respondents are bound to comply with the directions W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 58 of 95 made by the Supreme Court of India, the National Green Tribunal, this court as well as

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … private parties as well as the respondents are bound to comply with the directions W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 58 of 95 made by the Supreme Court of India, the National Green Tribunal, this court as well as

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

the individual petitions. The action proceeds on the basis that once notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act', is issued, any land in respect of which such notice has been

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4 and 5; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18, 26A and 35; Comptroller and Auditor-General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971 - Sections 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 57, 58 and 66; Indian Forest Act, 1878 - Sections 11, 20, 23, 25, 29, 30, 35 and 39; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 110, 110(1), 195, 199, 199(1), 266, 266(1), 266(2), 283, 284, 294 and 295; Environmental Law

Reported in : AIR2005SC4256; (2005)6CompLJ158(SC); JT2005(8)SC588; (2006)1SCC1; [2006] 3 SCR 1024

forest, the transit of forest produce and the duty leviable for timber and other forest produce, the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was enacted. To further tighten the management and regulation, the FC Act of 1980 was enacted. It became … of Bombay and Ors. [], one of the questions which arose for determination was regarding constitutional validity of Section 58 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. That section makes it obligatory on every Public Trust to pay to

Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3 to 27, 28 and 29 to 34; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 27; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 1 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 4 and 7(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 11; Land Holdings Act, 1972; Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1990SC1833; JT1990(3)SC215; 1990(2)SCALE95; (1990)4SCC320; [1990]3SCR469

the Act shall not apply to any land which is a reserved or protected forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 4 empowers the State Government to prohibit by notification the cutting, felling, gridling, lopping, burning, stripping off the … bighas certain unmeasured area also. The revenue of the cultivated area of 263.4 bighas is a paltry Rs. 58- 8- 3. It is not shown that the total revenue of cultivated lands in all the basas constituting