Advanced Search Results

The State of Jharkhand Through the Divisional Forest Officer, Dhanbad ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 - Sections 5, 10 13 and 16(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 42, 43, 45, 49, 52, 52A, 52B and 59A(2); Evidence Act; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : [2007(3)JCR503(Jhr)]

responsible for any such loss or damage unless he causes such loss or damage negligently, maliciously or fraudulently.Section 49 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is specific;-Government and its officers not liable for damage to such timber.-The … (Regulation) Act, 1990 is distinct from the criminal prosecution of the respondent under Section 41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 42 of the Act envisages penalty for breach of rules made under Section 41 of the Act which

Jogender Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 16, 17, 20, 27A and 38A; Uttar Pradesh Forest (Amendment) Act, 1965; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9(1), 9(2), 9A, 9A(2) and 49; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939; Uttar Pradesh Village Abadi Act, 1947; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 143K, 154, 155, 156, 157, 229B and 241

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC141

41 situated in village Gahloioya, Paragana and Tehsil Powayan, district Shahjahanpur. A notification under Section 4 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. (hereinafter referred to as the Forest Act) was issued by the State Government proposing the area therein to … also, the claims of the parties are decided which claimalso bars any subsequent adjudication as per provisions of Section 49. The dispute under the Forest Act is dispute of claims of land qua declaration of area as reserved

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sujit Kumar Rana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(3), 20, 29, 44(2A), 49(7), 50A to 59G, 62, 63, 67 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A, 136, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A(2), 6C, 6E and 7(1); Karnataka Forest Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR2004SC1851; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)258; (2004)3CALLT55(SC); [2004(4)JCR137(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC157; 2004(1)SCALE641; (2004)4SCC129

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for confiscation of forest-produce etc. under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') as amended by the State of West Bengal is in question in … S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION:1. Applicability of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for confiscation of forest-produce etc. under … possession of the property must be held to be implicit. If Section 49(7) is not so construed, it cannot be given effect to.We, therefore, are

Harish Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 372

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC562

Nos. 2, 45 and 41 are reserved forest. Notification under Sections 4, 6 and 20 under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, (hereinafter to be referred as the '1927 Act'), has been issued with regard to land recorded as forest … the claims of the parties are decided which claim also bars any subsequent adjudication as per provisions of Section 49. The dispute under the Forest Act is dispute of claims of land qua declaration of area as reserved

Surma Valley Saw Mill (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Assam Forest Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 49

property in respect of which an offence, is committed can be seized under Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. 4. In reply to the afore said submission, Mr. H. N. Sarma, learned, Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam, … vehemently contended that the only power that is available to the authorities to seize the machines is under Section 49 of the Assam Forest Regulation and under the said Section 49 as amended by the Assam Forest Regulation

Bombay Environment Action Group and Sameer Mehta Vs. State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Societies Registration Act; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 49(3), 195, 313 and 323(1); Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 4, 17, 17(1), 24, 25 and 33A; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5, 19 and 23; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Mahabaleshwar Municipal Council Act; Building Bye-laws and Development Control Rules; Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules, 2000; Environment Protection Rules, 1986 - Rules 3(3A) and 5(3); Development Control Regulations - Regulations 3 and 64B; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR235; 2007(1)BomCR721

the forests, both within and outside the municipal areas, shall be governed by the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980. All activities in the sanctuaries and national parks will be governed by the … (Maharashtra Water Supply Board) are also joined as Respondents therein. The MPCB is a body corporate constituted under Section 4 of the Water Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Water Act'). … come up. It is their duty as the Municipal Bodies under Section 49(3)(j) and (l) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act (supra) to see to

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … including the concerned road (W12D Link Road), already raised and/or being raised in the land bearing Khasra Nos.487, 490 and 491 in Indira Enclave ; (b) Issue appropriate writ or order or directions thereby directing the respondent

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … including the concerned road (W12D Link Road), already raised and/or being raised in the land bearing Khasra Nos.487, 490 and 491 in Indira Enclave ; (b) Issue appropriate writ or order or directions thereby directing the respondent

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined … it will be frustrated if what is intended to be inclusive is interpreted to exclude the actual owner.” 49. The proposition was more clearly articulated in Black Diamond Beverages v. Commercial Tax Officer[19]. wherein this Court considered