Advanced Search Results

Surinder Singh Brar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Section 4; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Section 4; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 48(5); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4(1), 5-A, 6, 7; Periphery Control Act, 1951; Chandigarh Allotment of Dwelling Units to the Oustees of Chandigarh Scheme, 1996

plan of the area, which included residential and commercial plots, preliminary notification under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was issued by the State Government on 28.2.1956 and final notification under Section 20 of that Act was … 6127.09 acres of land constituting hilly catchment came to vest in the Central Government by virtue of Section 48(5) of the 1966 Act.5. With the passage of time, Chandigarh became an important destination for education and attracted

Prabhagiya Van Adhikari Awadh Van Ppabhag Vs. Arun Kumar Bhardwaj (dea ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

been declared as Protected Forest by his Excellency Governor, as per the powers provided under Section 4 Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Act No.16 of 1927) According to Section 4 sub-section 1(C) of the aforesaid Act, concerned Sub-Divisional Officer is … on 22.07.1993. The appeal against the said order was dismissed. The Deputy Director Consolidation, in a revision under Section 48 of the Consolidation Act, vide order dated 08.07.2004, set aside the order dated 22.07.1993. The Deputy Director in

Padmappa Bheemappa Doddamani and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Ot ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927;- Sections 35; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 2(34), 45, 48-A and 77; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1952

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2580; 1998(5)KarLJ233

(Annexure-G) in No. KLR/TRB/140-265+502 on the ground of notification dated 25-4-1955 issued under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 but now those lands are made available for agriculture to other intending applicants.3. If appears that Kulavalli village … Bylahongal taluk, Belgaum district.2. According to the petitioners their applications filed in Form 7 claiming occupancy under Section 48-A of the Act, were rejected by the Land Tribunal in respect of these very lands by order dated

Consortium of Deepak Cable India Limited and Abir in Vs. Teesta Valley ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

appeals were heard.55. On September 07, 2011 the Government of India issued the necessary clearance under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 for execution of the works in the State of Sikkim. Pertaining to the forest land in the State … the facts and the contentions advanced, with the discussion commencing from paragraph 48 onwards of the decision : on the subject as to who had … order dated September 03, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing application filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to restrain the respondent from invoking the letter dated

Abir Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. Teesta Valley Power Transmissi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

appeals were heard.55. On September 07, 2011 the Government of India issued the necessary clearance under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 for execution of the works in the State of Sikkim. Pertaining to the forest land in the State … the facts and the contentions advanced, with the discussion commencing from paragraph 48 onwards of the decision : on the subject as to who had … order dated September 03, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing application filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to restrain the respondent from invoking the letter dated

M/S.Soorajmull Nagarmull Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

land has subsequently been declared to be a ‘Protected Forest’ as envisaged in Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as per Notification dated 4.9.1990. Thereafter, proceedings were once again initiated by the Respondent State vide another Section … Award. On 17.11.2003, the Respondent State took steps to annul the second proceedings by attempting to rely on Section 48 with the objective to withdraw from the acquisition. Subsequently, the Appellant filed another writ petition seeking the issuance

A.K. Thangadurai and ors. Vs. District Forest Officer, Madurai and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 - Sections 18; Tamil Nadu Forest Department Code; Cardamom Act, 1965 - Sections 9 and 20; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 48-A and 226

Reported in : AIR1985Mad104

is not exercising any powers either under the Cardamom Act (Central Act 42 of 1965) or under the Forest Act, 1927. The Cardamom Act (Central Act 42 of 1905) deals with the establishment and constitution of a Cardamom Board … of 1979, 564. 897 to 903, 1292, 1304, 1542 to 1545, 1570, 1604, 1711 to 1713, 1740, 1746, 4814, 5927, 6002, 6181, 6584, 6655, 6680, 6774, 6859 and 6944 of 1980.The main and substantial grounds of attack

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … is further submitted that “a joint survey was conducted by the revenue department on 28.1.2005 for Khasra No.484, 485” in the presence of “Patwari, Tehsildar, the Forest Department & Gram Sabha (BDO)”. These applicants claim that so

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … is further submitted that “a joint survey was conducted by the revenue department on 28.1.2005 for Khasra No.484, 485” in the presence of “Patwari, Tehsildar, the Forest Department & Gram Sabha (BDO)”. These applicants claim that so

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined