Advanced Search Results

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra … heads or subjects; List II being the State List comprises 66 heads or subjects while List III comprises 47 heads or subjects and ordinarily all the Entries in the three Lists in between them exhaust all conceivable

Samatbhai Punabhai Jhalandra Vs. Mamlatdar and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957 - Sections 9; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 11, 12, 15 and 16; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 37(2), 39A, 43, 46, 47, 51, 61, 79A and 203

Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ195Guj

Bombay Section 46.Section 47.Section 51.Section 61.Section 79A, except Clause (b) thereof.________________________________________________________________________4 1[***]________________________________________________________________________5 1[***]________________________________________________________________________6 1[***]________________________________________________________________________7 1[***]________________________________________________________________________8 1[***]________________________________________________________________________9 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927) Section 12.Section 15.Section 16.________________________________________________________________________10 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927),as adapted

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined

Harish Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 372

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC562

Nos. 2, 45 and 41 are reserved forest. Notification under Sections 4, 6 and 20 under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, (hereinafter to be referred as the '1927 Act'), has been issued with regard to land recorded as forest … on 16.3.1954 and published in U. P. Gazette on 27.3.1954 thus after 47 years of issuance of the said notification, the petitioners cannot be allowed … challenging the same order dated 25.6.2001 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly Camp at Shahjahanpur under Section 48 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and the order dated 15.1.2000 passed by the Settlement

Abir Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. Teesta Valley Power Transmissi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

appeals were heard.55. On September 07, 2011 the Government of India issued the necessary clearance under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 for execution of the works in the State of Sikkim. Pertaining to the forest land in the State … order dated September 03, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing application filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to restrain the respondent from invoking the letter dated … would show that 48.4485 hectares land in the State of Sikkim and 47.4932 hectares land in West Bengal was affected.56. Neither party has brought out

Bombay Environmental Action Group and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15, 19, 21, 38, 39, 46, 47, 48-A, 51-A and 226; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(25)(23)(7), 3, 4(1), (2), 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 36-a, 44, 113, 115 and 159; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 1; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964; Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 1 to 87 and 88(1); Maharashtra Pollution Control Board under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1955; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936; Nagar Panch

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR455

It is next submitted that the notification is in violation of the provisions contained in the Indian Forests Act, 1927, Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Maharashtra Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 and hence invalid. It is submitted that the … by the owner or developer for the project. The Government and the Sahara tried to support this under section 47(2)(c) of the Ceiling Act. Section 47(2)(c) is as under :-- '47(2) Subject to any rules made in this

Consortium of Deepak Cable India Limited and Abir in Vs. Teesta Valley ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

appeals were heard.55. On September 07, 2011 the Government of India issued the necessary clearance under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 for execution of the works in the State of Sikkim. Pertaining to the forest land in the State … order dated September 03, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing application filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to restrain the respondent from invoking the letter dated … would show that 48.4485 hectares land in the State of Sikkim and 47.4932 hectares land in West Bengal was affected.56. Neither party has brought out

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … No.4687/2010 before this Court (paras 43 to46) VII. When did the road in question come into existence?. (paras 47 to70) VIII. Availability of and prohibitions under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (paras 71 to78) IX. Fencing of

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … No.4687/2010 before this Court (paras 43 to46) VII. When did the road in question come into existence?. (paras 47 to70) VIII. Availability of and prohibitions under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (paras 71 to78) IX. Fencing of