Advanced Search Results
Samatbhai Punabhai Jhalandra Vs. Mamlatdar and 3 ors.
Gujarat
Dec-12-2006
Property
Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957 - Sections 9; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 11, 12, 15 and 16; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 37(2), 39A, 43, 46, 47, 51, 61, 79A and 203
(2007)IIILLJ195Guj
Bombay Section 46.Section 47.Section 51.Section 61.Section 79A, except Clause (b) thereof.________________________________________________________________________4 1[***]________________________________________________________________________5 1[***]________________________________________________________________________6 1[***]________________________________________________________________________7 1[***]________________________________________________________________________8 1[***]________________________________________________________________________9 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927) Section 12.Section 15.Section 16.________________________________________________________________________10 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927),as adapted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGujarat Forest Producers, Gatherers and Forest Workers Union Vs. State ...
Gujarat
Apr-12-2004
EnvironmentConstitution
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; 7A 33(1) and 33C(2) ;Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 2(1) ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 23.3, 39B, 46, 48A, 51A, 141, 166, 298, 309, 310 and 311; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2; Monopolies and Restrictive trade Practice Act, 1969 - Sections 2; Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 5 and 8
(2004)2GLR568; (2004)IIILLJ259Guj
to briefly undertake the exercise in the context of the subject of 'Forest' at Srl.No.1. The Indian Forests Act, 1927 is the law relating to the forests, the transit of forest produce and the duty leviable on timber … Co. Ltd. v. Ramanuj Yadav and Ors., reported in (2004) SCC L&S; 46 and Executive Engineer, Yavatmal v. Anant, reported in (1991)1 LLM 155 [para … and the Irrigation Department of the State can be said to be an industry within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or not ?(2) What is the correct law between the two
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGodrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-30-2014
Land Acquisition
consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined … on the landholder. It is under these circumstances that these appeals were listed before us. The primary question 46. The initial question is whether the disputed land is at all a forest within the meaning of Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Delhi
Jan-24-2018
Land Acquisition
the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … the Gaon Sabha under this section and may make such incidental and consequential order as may be necessary.” 46. At this stage, we may also notice the rejection of the legal challenge which was laid to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi
Jan-24-2018
Land Acquisition
the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … the Gaon Sabha under this section and may make such incidental and consequential order as may be necessary.” 46. At this stage, we may also notice the rejection of the legal challenge which was laid to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Abdul Jalil and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-05-1964
Criminal
Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 20; Tripura Forest Act - Sections 5
AIR1965SC147; 1965CriLJ128; [1964]8SCR158
in these several appeals were prosecuted before Magistrates in Tripura for offences under s. 26(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and were convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and fine. Their appeals to the learned Sessions Judge, … appeals were prosecuted read : '26. (1) Any person who - (a) makes any fresh clearing prohibited by section 5, or who, in a reserved forest - (d) trespasses or pastures cattle, or permits cattle to trespass; … had trespassed into the Garjichhera reserve, while those concerned in appeals 42, 46 and 48 had trespassed into the Chandrapur reserve, and the respondent in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBombay Environmental Action Group and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra ...
Mumbai
Dec-04-1998
CivilProperty
Constitution of India - Articles 15, 19, 21, 38, 39, 46, 47, 48-A, 51-A and 226; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(25)(23)(7), 3, 4(1), (2), 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 36-a, 44, 113, 115 and 159; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 1; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964; Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 1 to 87 and 88(1); Maharashtra Pollution Control Board under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1955; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936; Nagar Panch
1999(1)BomCR455
It is next submitted that the notification is in violation of the provisions contained in the Indian Forests Act, 1927, Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Maharashtra Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 and hence invalid. It is submitted that the … the Constitution. Our attention is invited to the observations made in para 46 which are as under :-'.....The reasonableness of a restriction shall he tested … was included for preparation of Regional Plan. By the said Notification, Pune Regional Planning Board was constituted under section 4(1)(2) and section 20(1) of M.R.T.P. Act. The said Board prepared existing land use map of the region
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChiranjilal Bajoria and Ors. Vs. Sudhir Jalan and Ors.
Kolkata
Sep-22-2017
Land Acquisition
1981. The Bhagalpur land, thereafter, came to be declared as protected forest under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, whereupon acquisition proceedings were once again initiated by the State of Bihar by a fresh notification of 24th … Bihar Government on the accounts being settled and upon discharge of the liabilities. This relief is based on Section 46 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. It is submitted that Section 46 recognised that even a representative of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher
Supreme Court of India
Sep-15-2017
Right to Information
and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … not impliedly overrule the 1927 Act, both the legislations being under different subjects. It is submitted that argument 46 of implied repeal could have arisen only where there is no option. To take a view that 1957
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus
Supreme Court of India
May-22-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480
Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »