Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 46 · Page 1 of about 97 results (0.041 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 12 2006

Samatbhai Punabhai Jhalandra Vs. Mamlatdar and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957 - Sections 9; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 11, 12, 15 and 16; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 37(2), 39A, 43, 46, 47, 51, 61, 79A and 203

Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ195Guj

Bombay Section 46.Section 47.Section 51.Section 61.Section 79A, except Clause (b) thereof.________________________________________________________________________4 1[***]________________________________________________________________________5 1[***]________________________________________________________________________6 1[***]________________________________________________________________________7 1[***]________________________________________________________________________8 1[***]________________________________________________________________________9 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927) Section 12.Section 15.Section 16.________________________________________________________________________10 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927),as adapted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2004

Gujarat Forest Producers, Gatherers and Forest Workers Union Vs. State ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-12-2004

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; 7A 33(1) and 33C(2) ;Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 2(1) ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 23.3, 39B, 46, 48A, 51A, 141, 166, 298, 309, 310 and 311; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2; Monopolies and Restrictive trade Practice Act, 1969 - Sections 2; Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 5 and 8

Reported in : (2004)2GLR568; (2004)IIILLJ259Guj

to briefly undertake the exercise in the context of the subject of 'Forest' at Srl.No.1. The Indian Forests Act, 1927 is the law relating to the forests, the transit of forest produce and the duty leviable on timber … Co. Ltd. v. Ramanuj Yadav and Ors., reported in (2004) SCC L&S; 46 and Executive Engineer, Yavatmal v. Anant, reported in (1991)1 LLM 155 [para … and the Irrigation Department of the State can be said to be an industry within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or not ?(2) What is the correct law between the two

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2014

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-30-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined … on the landholder. It is under these circumstances that these appeals were listed before us. The primary question 46. The initial question is whether the disputed land is at all a forest within the meaning of Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 24 2018

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … the Gaon Sabha under this section and may make such incidental and consequential order as may be necessary.” 46. At this stage, we may also notice the rejection of the legal challenge which was laid to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2018

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … the Gaon Sabha under this section and may make such incidental and consequential order as may be necessary.” 46. At this stage, we may also notice the rejection of the legal challenge which was laid to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 1964

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Abdul Jalil and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-1964

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 20; Tripura Forest Act - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1965SC147; 1965CriLJ128; [1964]8SCR158

in these several appeals were prosecuted before Magistrates in Tripura for offences under s. 26(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and were convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and fine. Their appeals to the learned Sessions Judge, … appeals were prosecuted read : '26. (1) Any person who - (a) makes any fresh clearing prohibited by section 5, or who, in a reserved forest - (d) trespasses or pastures cattle, or permits cattle to trespass; … had trespassed into the Garjichhera reserve, while those concerned in appeals 42, 46 and 48 had trespassed into the Chandrapur reserve, and the respondent in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1998

Bombay Environmental Action Group and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-04-1998

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15, 19, 21, 38, 39, 46, 47, 48-A, 51-A and 226; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(25)(23)(7), 3, 4(1), (2), 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 36-a, 44, 113, 115 and 159; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 1; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964; Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 1 to 87 and 88(1); Maharashtra Pollution Control Board under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1955; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936; Nagar Panch

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR455

It is next submitted that the notification is in violation of the provisions contained in the Indian Forests Act, 1927, Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Maharashtra Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 and hence invalid. It is submitted that the … the Constitution. Our attention is invited to the observations made in para 46 which are as under :-'.....The reasonableness of a restriction shall he tested … was included for preparation of Regional Plan. By the said Notification, Pune Regional Planning Board was constituted under section 4(1)(2) and section 20(1) of M.R.T.P. Act. The said Board prepared existing land use map of the region

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2017

Chiranjilal Bajoria and Ors. Vs. Sudhir Jalan and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-22-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

1981. The Bhagalpur land, thereafter, came to be declared as protected forest under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, whereupon acquisition proceedings were once again initiated by the State of Bihar by a fresh notification of 24th … Bihar Government on the accounts being settled and upon discharge of the liabilities. This relief is based on Section 46 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. It is submitted that Section 46 recognised that even a representative of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2017

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2017

Subject : Right to Information

and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … not impliedly overrule the 1927 Act, both the legislations being under different subjects. It is submitted that argument 46 of implied repeal could have arisen only where there is no option. To take a view that 1957

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2025

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-22-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial