Advanced Search Results

The State of Jharkhand Through the Divisional Forest Officer, Dhanbad ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 - Sections 5, 10 13 and 16(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 42, 43, 45, 49, 52, 52A, 52B and 59A(2); Evidence Act; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : [2007(3)JCR503(Jhr)]

(Regulation) Act, 1990 is distinct from the criminal prosecution of the respondent under Section 41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 42 of the Act envisages penalty for breach of rules made under Section 41 of the Act which … not be responsible for any loss or damage which may occur in respect of any timber collected under Section 45, and no Forest Officer shall be responsible for any such loss or damage, unless he causes such loss

Padmappa Bheemappa Doddamani and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Ot ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927;- Sections 35; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 2(34), 45, 48-A and 77; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1952

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2580; 1998(5)KarLJ233

(Annexure-G) in No. KLR/TRB/140-265+502 on the ground of notification dated 25-4-1955 issued under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 but now those lands are made available for agriculture to other intending applicants.3. If appears that Kulavalli village … impugned order dated 31-3-1982 (Annexure-G).5. It cannot be seriously disputed that for claiming occupancy rights in terms of Section 45 of the Act, the applicant has to inter alia show that he was a tenant over the land.

Sinhagad Technical Education Society, through its duly Authorized Pres ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

affidavit on the provisions of the said Act of 1975 as well as the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short “the said Act of 1927”). It is contended that in view of Clause (f) of Section … Revenue Code, 1966 (for short “the said Code”) and in case the breach is established, to proceed under Section 45 of the said Code. It is contended in the reply that the activity of setting up a Golf

State of Maharashtra Vs. Mohammad Shabbir Sheikh NajmuddIn and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 42 and 64; Bombay Transit of Forest Produce (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Rules, 1960 - Rules 3 and 25

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR439; 1999CriLJ4019

Sonawane-driver of the truck were prosecuted for the offence punishable under sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 on the allegations that they were found in possession of forest produce without valid transit pass. The Range … Criminal Case No. 57/96 whereby the present non-applicants 1 and 3 were discharged from the offence punishable under sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act and the property was returned to the complainant i.e. Forest … No. 12/97 filed by the petitioner and allowed the Criminal Appeal No. 45/96 preferred by the respondent No. 1. Being aggrieved by the same the

Ranvijai Singh Vs. Divisional Forest Officer and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 80

Reported in : AIR1953HP33

Ranvijai Singh of Nahan for the issue to the respondents, the Divisional Forest Officer Nahan, the State of Himachal Pradesh and the Conservator of Forests … petitioner; that the Conservator was not invested with any power to assess the compensation under the Indian Forests Act, 1927, and it could only be fixed by a competent Court; and that instead of resorting to a Court … -- 'Municipal Corporation Bombay v. Govind Laxman', AIR 1949 Bom, 229. They are all cases of petitions under Section 45, Specific Belief Act, but the principles dealing with various writs, whether under that section or under Article 226

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … it has to be understood for the purpose of include “forest” as understood in W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 45 of 95 29-11-1996 Dehradun Section 2 of the Act. The provisions enacted in the Forest Conservation Act, 1980

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … it has to be understood for the purpose of include “forest” as understood in W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 45 of 95 29-11-1996 Dehradun Section 2 of the Act. The provisions enacted in the Forest Conservation Act, 1980

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined … counsel for the petitioner states that he will not claim any refund of the amount so deposited. ” 45. When the present set of appeals came up for hearing before this Court on 9th February 2011, the

Uma Paliwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 - Rule 4; Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953; Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18, 19 to 25, 26A, 35 and 66(4); Constitution of India - Article 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Wildlife (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 1991; Forest Act, 1927; Forest (Amendment) Act, 1980; Forest Rules, 1981

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1118

falling within the area declared Under Section 18 is not reserved forest area as declared under the Indian Forest Act. 1927 (for brevity 'old Forest Act'), nor proceedings Under Sections 19 to 25 were pending on the date of