Advanced Search Results

The State of Jharkhand Through the Divisional Forest Officer, Dhanbad ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 - Sections 5, 10 13 and 16(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 42, 43, 45, 49, 52, 52A, 52B and 59A(2); Evidence Act; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : [2007(3)JCR503(Jhr)]

in time pursuant to the direction of this Court dated 22.9.2000. Similarly law is very specific as per Section 43 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and to quote,Government and Forest-Officers not liable for damage to forest produce … (Regulation) Act, 1990 is distinct from the criminal prosecution of the respondent under Section 41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 42 of the Act envisages penalty for breach of rules made under Section 41 of the Act which

Samatbhai Punabhai Jhalandra Vs. Mamlatdar and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957 - Sections 9; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 11, 12, 15 and 16; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 37(2), 39A, 43, 46, 47, 51, 61, 79A and 203

Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ195Guj

Bombay Section 46.Section 47.Section 51.Section 61.Section 79A, except Clause (b) thereof.________________________________________________________________________4 1[***]________________________________________________________________________5 1[***]________________________________________________________________________6 1[***]________________________________________________________________________7 1[***]________________________________________________________________________8 1[***]________________________________________________________________________9 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927) Section 12.Section 15.Section 16.________________________________________________________________________10 The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (XVI of Section 11.1927),as adapted … the followingprovisions1 2________________________________________________________________________1 The Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 Section 37, Sub-section (2)(Bom. V of 1879). Section 39A.Section 43.Section 46.Section 47.Section 51.Section 61.Section 79A, except Clause(b) thereof.________________________________________________________________________2 The Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 Section 37, Sub-section (2)(Bom.

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined … Insurance Scheme hospital also came to be declared as acquired under the Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975.” 43. The Forest Bench referred the matter to the Central Empowered Committee which, in its Report dated 13th July

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … VI. Notification dated 2nd April, 1996 - Challenge thereto by way of WP(C) No.4687/2010 before this Court (paras 43 to46) VII. When did the road in question come into existence?. (paras 47 to70) VIII. Availability of and

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … VI. Notification dated 2nd April, 1996 - Challenge thereto by way of WP(C) No.4687/2010 before this Court (paras 43 to46) VII. When did the road in question come into existence?. (paras 47 to70) VIII. Availability of and

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Abdul Jalil and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 20; Tripura Forest Act - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1965SC147; 1965CriLJ128; [1964]8SCR158

in these several appeals were prosecuted before Magistrates in Tripura for offences under s. 26(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and were convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and fine. Their appeals to the learned Sessions Judge, … appeals were prosecuted read : '26. (1) Any person who - (a) makes any fresh clearing prohibited by section 5, or who, in a reserved forest - (d) trespasses or pastures cattle, or permits cattle to trespass; … one or other of these three reserves. The respondents in Appeals 39, 43, 47 and 49 had trespassed into the Garjichhera reserve, while those concerned

Dolphil Minerals Vs. Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

the say of the respondents that the land was not forest land as per the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 or the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 on the date of auction of the mines. It is, however, conceded … come to know about the notification dated 5.3.1970 issued by the Forest Department of State of Haryana under Section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 (hereinafter to be referred to as “the Act of 1900”.)

Palanichamy Vs. Forest Range Officer, Cumbum, Madurai District

Court : Chennai

Subject : criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1927 -- Sections 41, 43, 49-A, 49-G; Tamil Nadu Amendment Act 44 of 1992; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC290

Uthamapalayam, within whosejurisdiction the said scheduled timber was seized, by exercising power underSection 41(3), Proviso (b) read with Section 43 of the Tamil Nadu Forest Act.The learned Judicial Magistrate, thus, by exercising power under Section41(3) Proviso (B) read … No.TNN-4734 was confiscated by the learned Judicial Magistrate, by exercising power under Section 49-G of the Tamil Nadu Forest Act. 3. According to the prosecution the lorry bearing registrationNo.TNN-4734, belonging to the petitioner was seized, when the lorry

Kasi Prasad Sahu Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(6), 41, 43 and 85A; Orissa Timber and Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1958 - Rules 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 301 and 305

Reported in : AIR1963Ori24; 29(1963)CLT76

a view to further restrict the scope of the expression 'forest produce' in Section 41 does not arise. Section 43 says that Government or any forest officer shall not be liable for any loss or damage to any … his behalf by Mr. Das are as follows:(i) A careful scrutiny of the various provisions of the Indian Forest Act would show that the provisions of the Act dealing with forest produce are applicable only to such forest

Chiranjilal Bajoria and Ors. Vs. Sudhir Jalan and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

1981. The Bhagalpur land, thereafter, came to be declared as protected forest under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, whereupon acquisition proceedings were once again initiated by the State of Bihar by a fresh notification of 24th … partneRs.It is argued that since contracts disentitle the partners to seek dissolution, the prayers cannot be allowed. Moreover, Section 43 permits only a partner to give notice for the purpose of dissolution of the firm and Section 44