Advanced Search Results
The State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-25-2003
CriminalFood Adulteration
Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 5, 6, 32, 33(1), 41, 41(1), 42, 42(1), 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D, 53C, 55 and 61; Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 32; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29(2) and 30; Bihar Timber and other Forest Produce Regulation of Transit Rules, 1973; Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102 and 103; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955
AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344
to the case by virtue of Section 32 of the said Act and the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 stood excluded and consequently the Authorities under the central enactment had no powers to confiscate the vehicle and … trees and leaves, flowers and fruits and all other parts or produce not mentioned in the earlier part. Section 41 provides for the State Governments making their own rules, to regulate the transit of all timber and other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirji Lalji Patel and Co. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretar ...
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-15-1963
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 301, 303 and 305; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41; Forest Rules, 1927 - Rules 3 and 4
AIR1965MP211; 1965MPLJ541
suggested that any otherwise direction of the President directing anything to affect the continuance of the existing law--Indian Forest Act, 1927--exists. That law consequently continues as valid. Section 41 of that Act therefore is also valid and good and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. and ors. Vs. Sitapur Packing Wood Suppliers Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-23-2002
Other TaxesConstitution
Uttar Pradesh Transit of Timber and Other Forest Produce Rules, 1978 - Rules 3, 4(1), 5, 6(4), 14 and 15; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 41(2), 42, 51 and 76; Uttar Pradesh Resin and Other Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1976
AIR2003SC2165; JT2002(4)SC341; 2002(4)SCALE26; (2002)4SCC566; [2002]3SCR345
have been framed in exercise of the powers under Sections 41 42 51 and 76 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Rule 3 provides for regulation of transit of forest produce by means of passes. It places restrictions on … of the Conservator of Forests of the Circle, or the Divisional Forest Officer, shall also be affixed.' 5. Section 41 of the Act empowers the State Government to make (sic) to regulate the transit of timber and other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajesh Kumar Mittal Vs. State of Bihar
Patna
Jan-18-2005
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41 and 42; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 414
suspecting the accused persons.6. Besides this learned Addl. P.P. also submitted that under Section 41 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 a power was vested in the State Government to make rules to regulate the transit of the timbers
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Mysore Vs. H. Sanjeeviah
Supreme Court of India
Jan-16-1967
Constitution
Mysore Forest Act, 1900 - Sections 37, 37(1), 37(2) and 77; Timber Transit Rules - Rules 2 and 3; Mysore Forest Rules, 1952 - Rule 2; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 301, 303, 304, 305 and 366(10); Bihar and Orissa Forest Act, 1915 - Sections 27; Orissa Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41
AIR1967SC1189; [1967]2SCR673
coming into force of the Constitution in exercise of the power conferred by Section 41 of the Orissa Forest Act, 1927, were 'existing law,' and on that account not open to challenge because of Article 305 of the Constitution,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState (Represented by Range Forest Officer) Vs. Shri Rajesh Gaonkar
Mumbai
Jan-22-1999
Criminal
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52(2), 53, 54, 55, 61-A and 69; Goa Amendment Act, 1988; Preservation of Tree Act, 1986 - Sections 66; Goa, Daman and Diu Forest Rules, 1964 - Rule 22
2000(5)BomCR581
report of the circumstances to his superior officer.'The reference to sections in this Independent is to the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as amended by Goa Amendment Act, 1988. Section 53 provides for release of properties seized under section 52 … forest officers had the jurisdiction to deal with it - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 41: [ Swatanter Kumar, CJ, Smt Ranjana Desai & D.B. Bhosale, JJ] Arrest of accused - Held, A Police
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyamrao S/O Kewalram Kapgate and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and or ...
Mumbai
Apr-29-2003
Criminal
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52, 61A and 61G; Bombay Transit of Forest Porduce (Vidarbha Region, Saurashtra and Kutch Areas) Rules, 1960 - Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 457
2003(4)MhLj181
trolley which was seized by the Forest Officer in exercise of powers under Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'). The challenge is on two grounds, namely, that the transportation … be confiscated by his order, dated 20-6-1988 holding that the petitioners had contravened the provisions of law under Section 41 read with Section 26(i)(f) and Section 33(1)(a) of the Indian Forest Act. The tractor bears the registration No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askitarsi Timber Merchants Association and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Prade ...
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-29-1986
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6); Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 41(1) and 41(2); Madhya Pradesh Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961 - Rule 27; Madhya Pradesh Kashtha Chiran (Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1984 - Sections 4, 8, 9 and 22; Madhya Pradesh Kashtha Chiran (Viniyaman) Niyam, 1984 - Rule 3(6)
1986MPLJ307
The Forest Act, 1927 does not apply to 'specified forest produce' which is governed by the 1969 Act. Section 41 of the 1927 Act contains the rule making power to regulate transit of forest produce and Clause (h) … in the background of which the questions raised in this batch of petitions have to be considered. The Forest Act, 1927 is an Act to consolidate the law relating to forest, transit of forest produce and the duty leviable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of M.P. Vs. Harsh Gupta
Supreme Court of India
Dec-12-1997
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 5C, 12, 12A and 16; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26, 41, 42 and 69
1999CriLJ5011; (1998)8SCC630
Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 and Sections 26 and 42 read with Section 41 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the respondent was summoned by a Judicial Magistrate to stand trial. Assailing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Traders Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Feb-20-1998
Commercial
Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 5; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41; Transsit Rules - Rule 1
of Uttar Pradesh having Registration No. 41 for the year 1991, and is also registered under the Indian Forest Act. 1927 under Sections 41, 42, 51 and 78 read with Forest Produce Transport Rules, 1978, whereby it was granted … case of the petitioner that the goods were imported from Nepal under valid Bills of Entry. 7. Under Section 41 of the Indian Forest Act. 1927 the State Government is vested with power to control all rivers and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »