Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 39 · Page 1 of about 132 results (0.018 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 01 2014

Biresh Kumar Singh Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-01-2014

Subject : Education

is hereby dismissed. Wild Life (Protection) Act - Section 27, Section 29, Section 39 Section 51 - Indian Forest Act, 1927 Section 2, Section 41, Section 52, Section 52-C, Section 52(4) - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 451,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2014

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … by the State Legislature to give effect to the directive principles of state policy as contained in Article 39(b) of the Constitution? Chapter IV of the Constitution deals with directive principles of state policy. Directive principle of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1965

U.R. Mavinkurve Vs. Thakor Madhavsinghji Gambhirsingh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-1965

Subject : Property

Acts : Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Jagirs Abolition Act - Sections 2(2), 5, 8, 9 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 10 and 34(A); Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 3(16), 3(17), 3(19) and 40; Bombay Act, 1865; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965SC1747; [1965]3SCR177

of individuals legally subsisting. .....................................'9. Section 9 reads : '9. The rights to trees specially reserved under theIndian Forest Act, 1927, or any other law for the time being in force, exceptthose the ownership of which has been transferred … all the land includingforest areas in the said State and exercised full revenue power during theirregime. There were 39 villages in Waghach State in all of which there wereforests. Except for the lands which were cultivated, all

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 13 1997

State of Tripura and Others Vs. Sudhir Ranjan Nath

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-13-1997

Subject : Environment

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 15, 19, 37, 39(3 and 4), 41(2), 42, 76, 77, 78 and 548; Tripura Transit Rules - Rules 3(5) and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 110(2), 119(2), 301, 302 and 304; Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950; Mysore Forest Act - Sections 37; Essential Commodities Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1997SC1168; JT1997(2)SC530; 1997(2)SCALE154; (1997)3SCC665; [1997]2SCR29; 1997(1)UJ563(SC)

of the Transit Rules framed by the Government of Tripura under Section 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as illegal and ultravires the Constitution. The correctness of the said decision is challenged by the State of … necessary to notice the provisions of the several chapters of the Act except Chapters VI, VII and XII. Section 39 in Chapter VI confers upon the Central Government the power to levy duty on timber and other forest-produce.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1984

Kaviraj Ramlal Chaturbhuj Vs. Prant Officer, Dahod Prant and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-26-1984

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1984)2GLR1477

of that case that on 6-7-1956, the State Government issued a notification under Section 34(A) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 declaring all uncultivated lands in the said 39 villages to be forests for the purposes of Ch. 5

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2022

Abdul Vahab Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-04-2022

Subject : Education

available to the Court. 11.1 The impugned judgment , relied on a line of cases under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, particularly, State of MP. Vs Smt. KalloBai2 wherein, it was clarified that confiscatory proceedings are independent of main … v. State of MP6, wherein Justice D.M Dharmadhikari, writing for the Full Bench, opined that the provision of Section 39(1)(d) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, providing for absolute vesting of seized property with State Government, without a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2005

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2005

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4 and 5; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18, 26A and 35; Comptroller and Auditor-General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971 - Sections 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 57, 58 and 66; Indian Forest Act, 1878 - Sections 11, 20, 23, 25, 29, 30, 35 and 39; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 110, 110(1), 195, 199, 199(1), 266, 266(1), 266(2), 283, 284, 294 and 295; Environmental Law

Reported in : AIR2005SC4256; (2005)6CompLJ158(SC); JT2005(8)SC588; (2006)1SCC1; [2006] 3 SCR 1024

provided in Section 35. The power to impose duty on timber and other forest produce is contained in Section 39 of the Act.From the above, it can be seen that scheme of 1927 Act is a State managementforest, the transit of forest produce and the duty leviable for timber and other forest produce, the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was enacted. To further tighten the management and regulation, the FC Act of 1980 was enacted. It became

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2003

Shyamrao S/O Kewalram Kapgate and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-29-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52, 61A and 61G; Bombay Transit of Forest Porduce (Vidarbha Region, Saurashtra and Kutch Areas) Rules, 1960 - Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 457

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj181

trolley which was seized by the Forest Officer in exercise of powers under Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'). The challenge is on two grounds, namely, that the transportation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2011

Rajiv SarIn and anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 4A, 18(1)(cc), 19(1)(b), 3(10), 8; UP Amendment Act 1978 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ; Indian Forests Act 1927 - Section 36, 37, 84; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 40; Government of India Act. - Section 76, 107(2); Constitution of India. - Article 254, 31(2), 300A; Punjab Act - Section 10

senior counsel appearing for the appellants raised two contentions in the context of the inter-relation of the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the KUZALR Act; firstly, the case of alleged discrimination in as much as the Central Act i.e. … year 1976 appellants succeeded to the property in question. By a Gazette Notification dated 21st December, 1977 under Section 4-A of the Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as KUZALR … the statutory scheme under the UPZALR Act, 1950 is provided in Section 39(1) (e) in respect of forests. The said section provides for two methods

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2014

Indirabai Narayan Bivalkar, Deceased Through her L.Rs. and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-14-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

21 October 1959 entered into with Bivalkar for management of the subject land under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the same was wrongfully and arbitrarily transferred by Forest Department to Revenue Department on its deforestation and … raising grievance on either of these issues.” (at p. 2971, paragraph 34) 39. The Petitioners' contention in answer to above is acceptable, in this regard, … Bombay Personal Inam Abolition Act, 1952 (for short, “the Inam Abolition Act”) came to be enacted. Provisions of Sections 4, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 17 are relevant. In the year 1957, village was surveyed and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial