Advanced Search Results

State of Bihar Vs. Lt. Col. K.S.R. Swami

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1952; Bihar Private Forest Act, 1946 - Sections 14 and 30; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29, 30, 32 and 34; Bihar Private Forest (Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 19; Bihar Private Forests (Amendment) Act, 1947; Protected Forest Rules, 1953 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1966SC1847; 1962(0)BLJR333; [1962]3SCR727

Sections 14 and 30 of Bihar Private Forest Act, 1946, Sections 29, 30, 32 and 34 of Indian Forest Act, 1927, Section 19 of Bihar Private Forest (Amendment) Act, 1948, Bihar Private Forests (Amendment) Act, 1947 and Rule 8 of

U.R. Mavinkurve Vs. Thakor Madhavsinghji Gambhirsingh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Jagirs Abolition Act - Sections 2(2), 5, 8, 9 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 10 and 34(A); Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 3(16), 3(17), 3(19) and 40; Bombay Act, 1865; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965SC1747; [1965]3SCR177

of individuals legally subsisting. .....................................'9. Section 9 reads : '9. The rights to trees specially reserved under theIndian Forest Act, 1927, or any other law for the time being in force, exceptthose the ownership of which has been transferred … possessionbefore coming into force of the Act. On July 6, 1956 the State Governmentissued a notification under s. 34(A) of the Indian Forest Act. declaring alluncultivated lands in the said 39 villages to be forests for the

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Land Development Corpora ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 6; Bombay Salsette Estate Act, 1951 - Sections 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR24

was issued by the State Government to the Company under sub-section (3) of section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 calling upon the Company, the owner of the land, to show cause as to why notification under sub-section … not uphold the contention of the Corporation that it was necessary that the land should be notified under section 34-A of the Indian Forest Act before any action is taken under section 35 of the Act. According to

The Divisional Forest Officer Vs. Shri K.N. Shaikh and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 34-A and 35(3); Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 5 and 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR174; (2000)2BOMLR126

Forest Officer issued a notice to M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. under section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. On 30-8-1975 the State Act viz. Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 came into force on and from … issuance of a writ of prohibition. 2. The dispute pertains to a piece of land bearing Survey No. 345(A) situated at Borivli, Mumbai. It appears from the record that in the year 1962 the said land along

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

the individual petitions. The action proceeds on the basis that once notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act', is issued, any land in respect of which such notice has been … the property of Government. Initially it comprised Sections 35 to 38. By Bombay Act No. 62 of 1948 Section 34 A was inserted in this Chapter. It defines 'forest' by an inclusive definition. Section 35 deals with protection

Ankush Keshav Bowledkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 6, 24, 34-A, 35, 36-A, 36-B, 36-C and 37; Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 35(3) and 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 5, Rule 1

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR165

Private Forests Act came into force.6. In order to examine the aforesaid question section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') is relevant.'35. Protection of forests for special purposes.---(1) The State Government may, by … 1975 the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 (for short 'Private Forest Act') came into force and sections 34-A, 35, 36-A, 36-B, 36-C and 37 stood repealed. The petitioner and owners accordingly approached the Divisional Forest Officer

Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3 to 27, 28 and 29 to 34; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 27; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 1 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 4 and 7(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 11; Land Holdings Act, 1972; Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1990SC1833; JT1990(3)SC215; 1990(2)SCALE95; (1990)4SCC320; [1990]3SCR469

the Act shall not apply to any land which is a reserved or protected forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 4 empowers the State Government to prohibit by notification the cutting, felling, gridling, lopping, burning, stripping off the … The learned Trial Judge, therefore, held that the suit was neither barred by limitation nor on account of Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963. The other technical objections to the maintainability of the suit were spurned and

Japani Sahoo Vs. Chandra Sekhar Mohanty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 114, 115, 131 and 132; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 160, 161, 294, 323, 324, 325, 336, 341, 427, 448, 491, 500 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156, 156(3), 202, 204, 466-473 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : AIR2007SC2762; 2007CriLJ4068; 2007(4)CTC740; JT2007(9)SC471; 2007(3)KLT760(SC); 2007(9)SCALE400; 2007(2)LC941(SC)

offence in question alleged to have been committed by the accused was punishable under Section 33 of the Forest Act, 1927 of illicit felling of trees. The offence was punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to … Investigation was completed by May 6, 1981 and the Magistrate took cognizance for offences punishable under Sections 448, 341 and 323, IPC on March 12, 1982 after the expiry of period of limitation prescribed under Clause (b)

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … is further held that these resources cannot be converted into private ownership. Following was laid down in paragraph 34."4. Our legal system -- based on English common law -- includes the public trust doctrine as part of

Padmappa Bheemappa Doddamani and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Ot ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927;- Sections 35; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 2(34), 45, 48-A and 77; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1952

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2580; 1998(5)KarLJ233

(Annexure-G) in No. KLR/TRB/140-265+502 on the ground of notification dated 25-4-1955 issued under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 but now those lands are made available for agriculture to other intending applicants.3. If appears that Kulavalli village