Advanced Search Results
Anand Kumar Goenka Vs. State of M.P. and Others
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-24-2001
Criminal
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Sections 3, 3(2) and 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 4, 4(2), 5, 200 and 245; Madhya Pradesh Transit Rules - Rules 3 and 29; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 41 and 42
2001(3)MPHT252; 2001(3)MPLJ272
that the Forest Range Officer, Maihar investigated the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') and the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of … in Criminal Case No. 12/97.2. It appears that the Forest Range Officer, Maihar investigated the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') and the offences punishable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArun Kumar Agarwal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
Mar-25-2004
CivilEnvironment
Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2005Jhar32; 2004(52)BLJR1003; [2004(2)JCR450(Jhr)]
without jurisdiction.9. For the aforesaid reason, this writ application is allowed and the impugned notice is quashed. Indian Forest Act, 1927, Section 33 - Confiscation proceeding--Notice for initiation of--Petitioner has not been cutting and removing the trees--Not doing any mischief with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Nath Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh
Jun-27-1989
Criminal
Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 69; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 397, 452, 454, 468, 517 and 648; ;Constitution of India - Article 48A; ;Constitution of India (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976
1990CriLJ506
facts, in brief, are that the petitioner was prosecuted for an offence under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). He was accused of felling 15 Khair trees unauthorisedly from private area
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramlal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
May-01-2003
Criminal
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30 and 33(1); Madhya Pradesh Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 1(3), 5, 15(1), 15(2), 16, and 18
2003(4)MPHT354
No. 1098/92 whereby the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 33(1)(b) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (in short 'the Act') and under Section 16 of the M.P. Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 (in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-25-2003
CriminalFood Adulteration
Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 5, 6, 32, 33(1), 41, 41(1), 42, 42(1), 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D, 53C, 55 and 61; Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 32; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29(2) and 30; Bihar Timber and other Forest Produce Regulation of Transit Rules, 1973; Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102 and 103; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955
AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344
to the case by virtue of Section 32 of the said Act and the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 stood excluded and consequently the Authorities under the central enactment had no powers to confiscate the vehicle and … and the seizure could be effected after a long chase of the fleeing vehicle for contravention of Sections 33(1), 41(1) and 42(1) of Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act and Section 20 of the Trade Act. Our attention
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Hiralal
Allahabad
Jan-06-1953
Criminal
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Uttar Pradesh Forest Rules - Rule 6
AIR1953All355
We, therefore, dismiss the appeal. Criminal - construction on forest land - Sections 30, 32 and 33 of Forest Act, 1927 and Rule 6 of U. P. Forest Rules - breaking up or clearing forest land covered as offence … Dayal, J. 1. This is a Government Appeal against the acquittal of Hira Lal o an offence under Section 33, Forest Act (16 of 1927) by the Additional Sessions Judge of Kumaun who set aside the order of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of M.P. Vs. Mohd. Jabbar Khan
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-07-2002
Criminal
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 52; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 249 and 401; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5
2002CriLJ4812; 2002(3)MPHT465; 2002(3)MPLJ438
the aforesaid Magistrate against the accused in respect of offences punishable under Sections 33 and 52 of Indian Forest Act, 1927 on the allegation that he had felled 72 pieces of wood belonging to two categories, namely, teak and … ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the petitioner, the State of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Hadiya Begum Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-08-2008
CriminalEnvironment
2008CriLJ2082
A forest case No. 709/18 was registered against him under Section 33, 41 and 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for brevity 'the Act'). The prescribed authority by order dated 16-10-2001 vide Annexure-P/1 passed an order in exercise
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
Jun-18-2003
Environment
Bihar Forest (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 52 and 52(5); Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33
[2003(3)JCR256(Jhr)]
petitioner for the present. It has been informed that a criminal case under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 has been lodged and pending against some of the persons in connection with the incident in question. If
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of H.P. Vs. Satya Dev Sharma and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-09-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 120-B, 218, 379, 467, 468, 471, 419; Forest Act 1927 - Section 33; Prevention Of Corruption Act 1947 - Section 5(2)
(2002)10SCC601
JJ.] - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section. 120-B, Sections. 218, 379, 467, 468, 471 and 419 - Forest Act, 1927 - Section. 33 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section. 5(2) - Criminal conspiracy alleged to have
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »