Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 33 · Page 1 of about 203 results (0.019 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 2001

Anand Kumar Goenka Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-24-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Sections 3, 3(2) and 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 4, 4(2), 5, 200 and 245; Madhya Pradesh Transit Rules - Rules 3 and 29; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 41 and 42

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT252; 2001(3)MPLJ272

that the Forest Range Officer, Maihar investigated the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') and the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of … in Criminal Case No. 12/97.2. It appears that the Forest Range Officer, Maihar investigated the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') and the offences punishable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2004

Arun Kumar Agarwal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-25-2004

Subject : CivilEnvironment

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005Jhar32; 2004(52)BLJR1003; [2004(2)JCR450(Jhr)]

without jurisdiction.9. For the aforesaid reason, this writ application is allowed and the impugned notice is quashed. Indian Forest Act, 1927, Section 33 - Confiscation proceeding--Notice for initiation of--Petitioner has not been cutting and removing the trees--Not doing any mischief with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1989

Amar Nath Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-27-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 69; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 397, 452, 454, 468, 517 and 648; ;Constitution of India - Article 48A; ;Constitution of India (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 1990CriLJ506

facts, in brief, are that the petitioner was prosecuted for an offence under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). He was accused of felling 15 Khair trees unauthorisedly from private area

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 01 2003

Ramlal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-01-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30 and 33(1); Madhya Pradesh Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 1(3), 5, 15(1), 15(2), 16, and 18

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT354

No. 1098/92 whereby the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 33(1)(b) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (in short 'the Act') and under Section 16 of the M.P. Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 (in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2003

The State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-2003

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 5, 6, 32, 33(1), 41, 41(1), 42, 42(1), 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D, 53C, 55 and 61; Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 32; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29(2) and 30; Bihar Timber and other Forest Produce Regulation of Transit Rules, 1973; Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102 and 103; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344

to the case by virtue of Section 32 of the said Act and the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 stood excluded and consequently the Authorities under the central enactment had no powers to confiscate the vehicle and … and the seizure could be effected after a long chase of the fleeing vehicle for contravention of Sections 33(1), 41(1) and 42(1) of Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act and Section 20 of the Trade Act. Our attention

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1953

State Vs. Hiralal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-06-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Uttar Pradesh Forest Rules - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1953All355

We, therefore, dismiss the appeal. Criminal - construction on forest land - Sections 30, 32 and 33 of Forest Act, 1927 and Rule 6 of U. P. Forest Rules - breaking up or clearing forest land covered as offence … Dayal, J. 1. This is a Government Appeal against the acquittal of Hira Lal o an offence under Section 33, Forest Act (16 of 1927) by the Additional Sessions Judge of Kumaun who set aside the order of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2002

State of M.P. Vs. Mohd. Jabbar Khan

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-07-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 52; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 249 and 401; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002CriLJ4812; 2002(3)MPHT465; 2002(3)MPLJ438

the aforesaid Magistrate against the accused in respect of offences punishable under Sections 33 and 52 of Indian Forest Act, 1927 on the allegation that he had felled 72 pieces of wood belonging to two categories, namely, teak and … ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the petitioner, the State of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2008

Smt. Hadiya Begum Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-08-2008

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2082

A forest case No. 709/18 was registered against him under Section 33, 41 and 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for brevity 'the Act'). The prescribed authority by order dated 16-10-2001 vide Annexure-P/1 passed an order in exercise

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 2003

Vijay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-18-2003

Subject : Environment

Acts : Bihar Forest (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 52 and 52(5); Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR256(Jhr)]

petitioner for the present. It has been informed that a criminal case under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 has been lodged and pending against some of the persons in connection with the incident in question. If

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2000

State of H.P. Vs. Satya Dev Sharma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-09-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 120-B, 218, 379, 467, 468, 471, 419; Forest Act 1927 - Section 33; Prevention Of Corruption Act 1947 - Section 5(2)

Reported in : (2002)10SCC601

JJ.] - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section. 120-B, Sections. 218, 379, 467, 468, 471 and 419 - Forest Act, 1927 - Section. 33 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section. 5(2) - Criminal conspiracy alleged to have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial