Advanced Search Results

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra … State Government was also sought to be challenged on the ground that such acquisition was violative of Article 31(2) of the Constitution but in view of the fact that the said enactment has now been put in

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Shiv Nath

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30, 31 and 33; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Section 251

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3472

either perverse or based on no evidence.7. The learned trial Court also took note of the fact that Section 31 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 being mandatory in law as laid down by this Court in State … judgment, the learned trial Court found the accused Shiv Nath not guilty under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and acquitted him.2. Briefly stated, the facts are as follows. On 26-4-1983, it was alleged that the accused

Nous Kujur Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, West Division and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR54(Jhr)]

notified as protected forest vide notification No. CF/17033/55-2180-R dated, 5th of July 1955 under Section 29(5) of the Forest Act, 1927 and, therefore, the appellant has no claim over the land and the above notification have been issued by … Prasad, J.1. This appeal, at the instance of the appellant, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31.1.2000 and 14.2.2000 respectively passed in Title Suit No. 234/1993, whereby and whereunder the learned Subordinate Judge VI, Ranchi

Rajiv SarIn and anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 4A, 18(1)(cc), 19(1)(b), 3(10), 8; UP Amendment Act 1978 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ; Indian Forests Act 1927 - Section 36, 37, 84; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 40; Government of India Act. - Section 76, 107(2); Constitution of India. - Article 254, 31(2), 300A; Punjab Act - Section 10

senior counsel appearing for the appellants raised two contentions in the context of the inter-relation of the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the KUZALR Act; firstly, the case of alleged discrimination in as much as the Central Act i.e. … year 1976 appellants succeeded to the property in question. By a Gazette Notification dated 21st December, 1977 under Section 4-A of the Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as KUZALR … mention that there is no specific whisper of defence raised under Articles 31A, 31B and 31C of the Constitution in the Counter-Affidavit/Reply filed by the

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … Act and, in the second, whether the Act is constitutional in the sense that it is protected by Section 31-A(1). So far as the competence of the legislature is concerned, no objection is made before us. As to

Parisar an Organisation and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 31(D), 37 and 37(1); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A and 226

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR79

the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 were not applicable.The expression 'forest land' had not been defined under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 or under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Section 3 of the Indian Forest Act, however, gives some clue … said Act and to submit a draft development plan for Pune City to the Government for sanction under section 31 in accordance with the procedure laid down in the M.R.T.P. Act. The draft development plan was published on

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

the individual petitions. The action proceeds on the basis that once notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act', is issued, any land in respect of which such notice has been … Act. These entries, according to the petitioners, have been purported to be made for the first time after 31 years of the Private Forest Act coming into force. The entries have been made on the basis that

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

Uma Paliwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 - Rule 4; Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953; Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18, 19 to 25, 26A, 35 and 66(4); Constitution of India - Article 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Wildlife (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 1991; Forest Act, 1927; Forest (Amendment) Act, 1980; Forest Rules, 1981

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1118

falling within the area declared Under Section 18 is not reserved forest area as declared under the Indian Forest Act. 1927 (for brevity 'old Forest Act'), nor proceedings Under Sections 19 to 25 were pending on the date of … alleged 'reserve forest' would not have arisen?7. It is also the case of the petitioner that notification dt. 31-5-82 Under Section 18 of the Wildlife Act was published on 10-6-82 in Rajasthan Rajpatra proposing to constitute Jamwa

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Uday Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Protection Act, 1972. Intimation of the seizure was given to the Magistrate under Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 on 27 March 2011. The respondent moved an application4 under Section 451 of the CrPC5 before the JMFC, … the State government for directing the immediate release of a property seized under Section 52, as provided in Section 31 61. Hence, upon the receipt of an intimation by the Magistrate of the initiation of confiscation proceedings under