Advanced Search Results

State Vs. Hiralal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Uttar Pradesh Forest Rules - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1953All355

We, therefore, dismiss the appeal. Criminal - construction on forest land - Sections 30, 32 and 33 of Forest Act, 1927 and Rule 6 of U. P. Forest Rules - breaking up or clearing forest land covered as offence … was constructed by his father who died in 1939. This defence was not believed.3. The relevant portion of Section 30, Clause (c) of the Forest Act is :'The Provincial Government may by notification in the Official Gazette prohibit

State of Bihar Vs. Lt. Col. K.S.R. Swami

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1952; Bihar Private Forest Act, 1946 - Sections 14 and 30; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29, 30, 32 and 34; Bihar Private Forest (Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 19; Bihar Private Forests (Amendment) Act, 1947; Protected Forest Rules, 1953 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1966SC1847; 1962(0)BLJR333; [1962]3SCR727

Sections 14 and 30 of Bihar Private Forest Act, 1946, Sections 29, 30, 32 and 34 of Indian Forest Act, 1927, Section 19 of Bihar Private Forest (Amendment) Act, 1948, Bihar Private Forests (Amendment) Act, 1947 and Rule 8 of

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors., in Re: Arora Service Sta ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 20, 30

Reported in : (1999)9SCC208

on behalf of the applicant has contended that under the notification issued under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 the petitioner had filed the claim which was disposed of by the Forest Settlement Officer with the finding … placed before us a notification dated 10-4-1980 by which the entire area was constituted as protected forest under Section 30 of the Forest Act. In this notification the southern boundary of the central ridge has been shown as

The State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 5, 6, 32, 33(1), 41, 41(1), 42, 42(1), 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D, 53C, 55 and 61; Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 32; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29(2) and 30; Bihar Timber and other Forest Produce Regulation of Transit Rules, 1973; Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102 and 103; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344

needs of the manufacturer. On the other hand, the notification issued by the State Government on 19.10.1959, under Section 30 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, not only declared the species of trees enumerated therein as reserved in … to the case by virtue of Section 32 of the said Act and the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 stood excluded and consequently the Authorities under the central enactment had no powers to confiscate the vehicle and

Ramlal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30 and 33(1); Madhya Pradesh Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 1(3), 5, 15(1), 15(2), 16, and 18

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT354

No. 1098/92 whereby the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 33(1)(b) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (in short 'the Act') and under Section 16 of the M.P. Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 (in … is bad in law. It has also been contended by the learned Counsel that as no notification under Section 30 of the Act has been brought on record, the applicant can not be convicted under Section 33(1) of

Kamla Kant Pandey Vs. Prabhagiya Van Adhikari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 2(12), 2(12)B, 18A, 18(2), 20, 24, 24(2), 26A, 26A(3), 29 and 35; Wild Life Protection (Amendment) Act, 1991; Wild Life Protection (Amendment) Act, 2003; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2 and 2(4); Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rule 41

Reported in : AIR2005All136; 2005(1)AWC877

shall have the same meaning as In Sub-clause (b) of Clause (4) of Section 2 of the Indian Forest Act. 1927 (16 of 1927) ; ]'12. The present writ petition came to be initially filed assailing the orders dated … fell within the notified sanctuary area or not.17. Reliance has also been placed upon a survey report dated 30.4.2004 as also the letter of the District Magistrate dated 19.5.2004 on the basis whereof it is contended that

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Shiv Nath

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30, 31 and 33; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Section 251

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3472

169, the prosecution did not prove before the trial Court that a local vernacular notification was issued under Section 30 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 by the Collector or duly affixed in a conspicuous place of the … judgment, the learned trial Court found the accused Shiv Nath not guilty under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and acquitted him.2. Briefly stated, the facts are as follows. On 26-4-1983, it was alleged that the accused

Nous Kujur Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, West Division and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR54(Jhr)]

notified as protected forest vide notification No. CF/17033/55-2180-R dated, 5th of July 1955 under Section 29(5) of the Forest Act, 1927 and, therefore, the appellant has no claim over the land and the above notification have been issued by … the State of Bihar, the suit land was free from all encumbrances and when notification under Sections 29, 30 and 31 of the Indian Forest Act were published, no objection was raised and the Forest Department remained

Mohd. Mokhtar Ahmad @ Mohd. Mokhtar Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

has not been notified as a reserved tree in the protected forest under Section 30 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) nor any rule has been framed under Section 32 of the Act

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

the individual petitions. The action proceeds on the basis that once notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act', is issued, any land in respect of which such notice has been … the State to contend that the petitioners lands had automatically vested in the State Government with effect from 30th August, 1975, is not attracted at all. Besides the 1975 Act first defines 'forest' (section 2(c-1)) and then