Advanced Search Results

State of Bihar Vs. Lt. Col. K.S.R. Swami

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1952; Bihar Private Forest Act, 1946 - Sections 14 and 30; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29, 30, 32 and 34; Bihar Private Forest (Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 19; Bihar Private Forests (Amendment) Act, 1947; Protected Forest Rules, 1953 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1966SC1847; 1962(0)BLJR333; [1962]3SCR727

Sections 14 and 30 of Bihar Private Forest Act, 1946, Sections 29, 30, 32 and 34 of Indian Forest Act, 1927, Section 19 of Bihar Private Forest (Amendment) Act, 1948, Bihar Private Forests (Amendment) Act, 1947 and Rule 8 of

Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3 to 27, 28 and 29 to 34; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 27; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 1 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 4 and 7(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 11; Land Holdings Act, 1972; Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1990SC1833; JT1990(3)SC215; 1990(2)SCALE95; (1990)4SCC320; [1990]3SCR469

meantime may now be noticed. On 25th February, 1952 the Government of Himachal Pradesh issued a Notification under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 declaring that the provisions of Chapter IV of the said enactment shall … the Act shall not apply to any land which is a reserved or protected forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 4 empowers the State Government to prohibit by notification the cutting, felling, gridling, lopping, burning, stripping off the

The State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 5, 6, 32, 33(1), 41, 41(1), 42, 42(1), 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D, 53C, 55 and 61; Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 32; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29(2) and 30; Bihar Timber and other Forest Produce Regulation of Transit Rules, 1973; Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102 and 103; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344

to the case by virtue of Section 32 of the said Act and the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 stood excluded and consequently the Authorities under the central enactment had no powers to confiscate the vehicle and … forthwith to the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. The Range Officer of forest was said to have moved on 29.3.1993 the Authorised Officer to confiscate the seized forest produce and the truck and the said Authority appears to

Kamla Kant Pandey Vs. Prabhagiya Van Adhikari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 2(12), 2(12)B, 18A, 18(2), 20, 24, 24(2), 26A, 26A(3), 29 and 35; Wild Life Protection (Amendment) Act, 1991; Wild Life Protection (Amendment) Act, 2003; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2 and 2(4); Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rule 41

Reported in : AIR2005All136; 2005(1)AWC877

shall have the same meaning as In Sub-clause (b) of Clause (4) of Section 2 of the Indian Forest Act. 1927 (16 of 1927) ; ]'12. The present writ petition came to be initially filed assailing the orders dated … of a sanctuary shall be made by the State Government except on a recommendation of the National Board.'And Section 29 which came to be substituted in the following manner :'29. Destruction, etc. in a sanctuary prohibited without a

Biresh Kumar Singh Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

is hereby dismissed. Wild Life (Protection) Act - Section 27, Section 29, Section 39 Section 51 - Indian Forest Act, 1927 Section 2, Section 41, Section 52, Section 52-C, Section 52(4) - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 451,

Shaik HussaIn Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, Proddatur, Cuddapah Distr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Saw Mills (Regulation) Rules, 1969 - Rule 3, 3(1), (2), (3), 5(2), 7 and 7(1)(2); Andhra Pradesh Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1970; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - Sections 2, 29, 29(2), 68 and 68(1); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 41(1), (2), 42 and 76; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 301; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 11; Andhra Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1981

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD650; 2001(5)ALT187

The question as to whether such rules framed in terms of Sections 41, 42, and 76(d) of the Forest Act, 1927 are legal and valid, camp up for consideration before the Apex Court in State of Bihar v. Ranchi … be unscientific.7. It was urged that having regard to the specific and general rule making power contained in Section 29(2)(h) and Section 68 of the A.P. Forest Act, it must be held that as the specific provision cannot

Nous Kujur Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, West Division and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR54(Jhr)]

notified as protected forest vide notification No. CF/17033/55-2180-R dated, 5th of July 1955 under Section 29(5) of the Forest Act, 1927 and, therefore, the appellant has no claim over the land and the above notification have been issued by

Subhadra Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Environment

of 543.27 acres of land which along with other lands were notified under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') as 'protected forest.2. This case has a chequered history which goes back

Brajesh Kumar Ray and anr., Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 151, Order 39 - Rules 1 and 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 144 and 145

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR464(Jhr)]

petitioners, is that the Government of Bihar, in exercise of power conferred under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Act XIV of 1927), issued a Notification on 9th July, 1958, declaring the lands, mentioned in the Schedule

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2006SC1774; 2006(4)AWC4043(SC); JT2006(4)SC553; 2006(4)SCALE252; (2006)5SCC45

notification covering 'protected forest' for the then Central Provinces and Barar issued under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927; does not form part of the un-demarcated protected forest in village Ratija etc. It was further stated that