Advanced Search Results

State of M.P. Vs. Harsh Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 5C, 12, 12A and 16; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26, 41, 42 and 69

Reported in : 1999CriLJ5011; (1998)8SCC630

Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 and Sections 26 and 42 read with Section 41 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the respondent was summoned by a Judicial Magistrate to stand trial. Assailing

M/S. Digamber Pershad Kirti Prasad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Othe ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4(3 and 4), 20 and 26; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1996All1

retained by the seller, if full payment is not made. Sub-section (1) of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is relevant. Sub-section (I) of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 entitles the Forest Officer to … was sawn and collected after having taken control and possession of the trees and the timber.15. Then comes Section 26 of the Act, which states that unless otherwise agreed, the goods remain at the seller's risk until the

State of Maharashtra Vs. Pralhad Raghuji Sonwane and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

learned Magistrate acquitting the respondents of the offence punishable under Section 21(1)(b), (e) and (f) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. 3. The case of the prosecution is:- In the night between 31st December, 1994 and 1st January, 1995 … the reserved forest area at midnight. It is submitted that the accused have committed the offence under Section 26(1)(d),(e) and (f) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and are liable for punishment. It is prayed that the

Baddu. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 ; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26(1), 52, 52A, 52B, 52(4), 52(5) ; Madhya Pradesh Vanopaj (Vyapar Viniyaman), Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 5(1), 15(6) ;

prepared and a forest offence vide POR No. 2501/04 dated 21/03/2006 under section 26(1), 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 read with section 5(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Vanopaj (Vyapar Viniyaman), Adhiniyam, 1969 was registered. Proceeding to confiscate

Karna Laxman Gawali and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(1), 2(3), 2(6), 2(7), 25, 26, 26(1), 52, 52(1), 55, 61-A, 61-A(3), 61(B), 61-D, 70 and 71; Indian Forest (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 61A to 61G; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 71

Reported in : (1989)91BOMLR134; 1990CriLJ163; 1989MhLJ780

Can the cattle instrumental in the commission of forest offence under S. 26(1)(d) and/or (f) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (the Act) be confiscated under S. 61-A(3) of the Act, is a point of some importance raised in … term 'cattle', Section 2(3) the term 'forest-offence', Section 2(6) the term 'timber' and Section 2(7) the term 'tree'. Section 26(1) gives the list of forest offences. Sub-sections (d) and (f) read thus :'26. Acts prohibited in such forests

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Kisan Rupaji Ghatal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR93; 1978MhLJ618

The correctness of the said order of acquittal is challenged in this appeal.7. Section 26 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, deals with acts prohibited in the forests. After having dealt with the prohibited acts, Sub-section (1) of Section

State of Jharkhand and anr. Vs. Govind Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26, 33, 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 63 and 68; Bihar Forest (Amendment) Act, 1990; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005SC294; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)398; 2004(52)BLJR2340; [2005(1)JCR1(SC)]; JT2004(10)SC349; 2005(1)KLT34(SC); 2004(10)SCALE174; (2005)10SCC437

Court at Ranchi holding that even though there was no specific provision in Section 52(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (in short the 'Act') as amended by Bihar Act 9 of 1990 (hereafter referred to as the 'Bihar … that he has committed any forest offence, other than an offence specified in clauses (c) and (d) to Section 26, clauses (c) and (d) to Section 33 or Section 62 or Section 63, sum of money by way

Krishandeo Sah Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468(2), 471, 473 and 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26(1); Bihar Amendment Act, 1989

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR166(Jhr)]

where under the S.D.J.M. Porahat at Chaibasa has taken cognizance of the offence under Section 26(1)(d)(f)(g) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 read with Bihar Amendment Act, 1989 in connection with C/3 Case No. 12/2001 presently pending in the Court

State of Maharashtra Vs. Rajendra Hilal Patil and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26 and 55; Forest (Amendment) Act, 1985

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR287

be returned to the owner Jagannath Sahankar Badgujar forthwith. Criminal - seizure - Sections 26 and 55 of Forest Act, 1927 and Forest (Amendment) Act, 1985 - petition filed against Order of return of truck to its owner - … truck was being driven by the driver Rajendra Hilal Patil who was prosecuted for the offence punishable under section 26(g) of the Indian Forest Act and he was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 75/-. No order

State of Maharashtra Vs. Arjun Tabadu Mahajan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26(1) and 55

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR603

complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Shahada, for an offence under section 26(1)(d) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, against 49 persons. In the complaint, he mentioned that the accused persons have permitted their cattle numbering in