Advanced Search Results
State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Lal Chand and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-02-1984
Commercial
Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 22, 27, 28, 34, 58(1), 59 and 60; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956 - Rule 36(2), 36(3), 36(4), 36(16), 36(22-A), 36(23), 36(23)(1), 36(23)(2), 36(23-A) and 37(8-B); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 299(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest Contract Rules
AIR1984SC1326; 1984(1)SCALE690; (1984)3SCC634; [1984]3SCR715; 1984(16)LC722(SC)
in K.P. Chowdhary's, Mulamchand's, Rattan Lal's and Firm Gobardhan Dass's cases, supra, there are provisions in the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Forest Contract Rules framed thereunder for entering into a formal deed between the forest contractor and … Bihar & Orissa Excise Act, 1915 held that where the State Government in exercise of its powers Under section 22 of that Act grants exclusive privilege to any person on certain conditions under Section 22(1) and t licence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState (Represented by Range Forest Officer) Vs. Shri Rajesh Gaonkar
Mumbai
Jan-22-1999
Criminal
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52(2), 53, 54, 55, 61-A and 69; Goa Amendment Act, 1988; Preservation of Tree Act, 1986 - Sections 66; Goa, Daman and Diu Forest Rules, 1964 - Rule 22
2000(5)BomCR581
along with illegal material is seized under sections 52 and 69 of the Forest Act, 1927 and Rule 22 of the Goa, Daman & Diu Forest Rules, 1964. Therefore, inappropriate quotation of section 55 of the Forest … report of the circumstances to his superior officer.'The reference to sections in this Independent is to the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as amended by Goa Amendment Act, 1988. Section 53 provides for release of properties seized under section 52
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Swaropchandra
Supreme Court of India
Sep-24-1996
Environment
1996VIIIAD(SC)306; AIR1997SC301; 1996(7)SCALE616; (1996)11SCC175; [1996]Supp6SCR684
the truck under Section 19(1)(b) of the Act. By operation of Section 22 of the Act, the Central Forest Act, 1927 as amended by the State Amendment Act 9 of 1965 (for short, the 'Forest Act') is not applicable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kirodimal Agrawal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-24-1988
Criminal
1989CriLJ1344; 1988MPLJ600
Section 22 of the Adhiniyam wherein it has been clearly laid down that nothing contained in the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shall apply to specified forest produce in respect of matters for which provisions are contained in this Adhiniyam
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJanardan Sahu Vs. Arakhit Sahu
Orissa
Sep-23-1966
Criminal
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 70; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 20 and 22
AIR1967Ori150; 33(1967)CLT226; 1967CriLJ1354
roads, pleasure grounds, plantations, canals, drainage works, embankment and the like. But in Section 70 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, there is a deeming clause provided which says: '70. Cattle trespassing in a reserved forest or in any … ORDERK. Ahmad, C.J. 1. This is a case arising out of Section 22 of the Cattle Trespass Act. 1871. Thereunder the petitioner has been directed to pray Rs 40/- to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj Kumar Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others
Supreme Court of India
Jul-20-1990
Environment
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3 to 27, 28 and 29 to 34; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 27; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 1 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 4 and 7(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 11; Land Holdings Act, 1972; Evidence Act - Sections 92
AIR1990SC1833; JT1990(3)SC215; 1990(2)SCALE95; (1990)4SCC320; [1990]3SCR469
the Act shall not apply to any land which is a reserved or protected forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 4 empowers the State Government to prohibit by notification the cutting, felling, gridling, lopping, burning, stripping off the … on behalf of her minor son....The grant was ultimately given effect to be the mutation entry No. g 2299 dated 17/18-12-2003, Bikrami, Exh. P-13. Unfortunately, the plaintiff's mother who acted as his guardian after the death of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJanu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-14-1977
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3
AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499
was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra … of certain lands as private forest and the effect that would follow after such a declaration is made. Section 22 casts an obligation on the owners of private forests to deliver records relating to such private forests which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKailash Chand and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-19-1994
Constitution
Forest Act, 1927; Madhya Pradesh Amendment Act, 1983 - Sections 52(2), 52(3), 52(5), 52C and 170(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21; Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyaoar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 1, 15, 15C, 22 and 156; Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyaoar Viniyaman) (Amendment) Adhiniyam, 1987
AIR1995MP1
initiated against them. In most of the cases, action is being taken under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short, Central Act), as amended by the Indian Forest (M. P. Amendment) Act, 1983, (for short, 1983 … refused on the basis of Section 52C of Central Act, as amended by 1983 Act in view of Section 22 of the 1969 Act. (ix) Amendments to 1969 Act, introduced by Amending Act of 1987 have no retrospective
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Uttaranchal and anr. Vs. Lok Mani Sharma
Uttaranchal
Feb-07-2006
Contract
Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Rule 109; Uttar Pradesh Zimindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 2(1), 3(12) and 131; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3, 4, 20, 27; ;Indian Forest (Amendment) Act, 1974 - Sections 20; Government Grants Act, 1985; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 54, 353, 448 and 504; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80
AIR2006Utr54
which is paper No. 22-Ga on record. The Government has given power under Section 3 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 to constitute any forest-land or waste-land as reserved forest after issuing notification under Section 4 of the Act.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFeroz Shabbar HussaIn for Himself and as the Only Son and Legal Repres ...
Mumbai
Mar-29-2006
CommercialProperty
Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 6, 18, 22A, 22A(1); Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 35(1) and 35(3); Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 1978
AIR2006Bom256; 2006(3)ALLMR668; 2006(3)BomCR613; 2006(4)MhLj387
Mah. L.J. 776, has held that if a notice has been issued under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of any land prior to coming into force of the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 … filed on 11th March, 1991 before the Sub-Divisional Officer / Deputy Collector, Panvel to start inquiry under Section 22-A, suo motu and to release the land from declaration as forest land. The Sub-Divisional Officer / Dy. Collector,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »