Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 19 · Page 1 of about 370 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 14 1977

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-14-1977

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra … It may be pointed out that the Dried Fruits Act, 1924, a State Legislation of South Australia, by Section 19 created a Dried Fruit Board and empowered it to fix the maximum prices to be charged for sale

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2011

Rajiv SarIn and anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 4A, 18(1)(cc), 19(1)(b), 3(10), 8; UP Amendment Act 1978 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ; Indian Forests Act 1927 - Section 36, 37, 84; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 40; Government of India Act. - Section 76, 107(2); Constitution of India. - Article 254, 31(2), 300A; Punjab Act - Section 10

senior counsel appearing for the appellants raised two contentions in the context of the inter-relation of the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the KUZALR Act; firstly, the case of alleged discrimination in as much as the Central Act i.e. … and secondly, the case of alleged repugnancy. It was submitted that the provisions of Section 18(1)(cc) read with Section 19(1)(b) of KUZALR Act as amended by the UP Amendment Act 1978 are repugnant to Section 37 and Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1961

State of Bihar Vs. Lt. Col. K.S.R. Swami

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-22-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1952; Bihar Private Forest Act, 1946 - Sections 14 and 30; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29, 30, 32 and 34; Bihar Private Forest (Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 19; Bihar Private Forests (Amendment) Act, 1947; Protected Forest Rules, 1953 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1966SC1847; 1962(0)BLJR333; [1962]3SCR727

Sections 14 and 30 of Bihar Private Forest Act, 1946, Sections 29, 30, 32 and 34 of Indian Forest Act, 1927, Section 19 of Bihar Private Forest (Amendment) Act, 1948, Bihar Private Forests (Amendment) Act, 1947 and Rule 8 of Protected

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 21 2012

Kuldeep Sharma Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2040; 2012(3)KLT28(SN)(C.No.28)

an accused is entitled to engage an advocate in seizure/confiscation proceedings before the Authorised Officer under the Indian Forest Act, 1927? (2) The petitioner's request for engaging an advocate in confiscation proceedings is turned down by communicating the order … any law for the time being in force entitled to practise. (6) The petitioner by placing reliance on section 19 of the 1927 Act submits that a pleader/advocate can appear before the Authorised Officer. Shri Saxena submits that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1963

Virji Lalji Patel and Co. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretar ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-15-1963

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 301, 303 and 305; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41; Forest Rules, 1927 - Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1965MP211; 1965MPLJ541

suggested that any otherwise direction of the President directing anything to affect the continuance of the existing law--Indian Forest Act, 1927--exists. That law consequently continues as valid. Section 41 of that Act therefore is also valid and good and … forging unreasonable restrictions on the right of the petitioner to acquire and dispose of property guaranteed under Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution inasmuch as there are no reasonable criteria under the rules nor any standard for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2002

Uma Paliwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-29-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 - Rule 4; Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953; Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18, 19 to 25, 26A, 35 and 66(4); Constitution of India - Article 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Wildlife (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 1991; Forest Act, 1927; Forest (Amendment) Act, 1980; Forest Rules, 1981

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1118

falling within the area declared Under Section 18 is not reserved forest area as declared under the Indian Forest Act. 1927 (for brevity 'old Forest Act'), nor proceedings Under Sections 19 to 25 were pending on the date of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1965

U.R. Mavinkurve Vs. Thakor Madhavsinghji Gambhirsingh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-1965

Subject : Property

Acts : Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Jagirs Abolition Act - Sections 2(2), 5, 8, 9 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 10 and 34(A); Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 3(16), 3(17), 3(19) and 40; Bombay Act, 1865; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965SC1747; [1965]3SCR177

of individuals legally subsisting. .....................................'9. Section 9 reads : '9. The rights to trees specially reserved under theIndian Forest Act, 1927, or any other law for the time being in force, exceptthose the ownership of which has been transferred … the forest lands and enjoyed the produce asfull owners thereof. By the agreement of merger dated June 1, 1948 the State ofWaghach was merged with the State of Bombay with effect from June 10, 1948. OnAugust 19,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1965

Badri Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-16-1965

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Forest Contract Rules - Rules 1, 5, 8, 18, 18(2), 18(3), 19(3), 20, 20(2), 32 and 102A; Forest Contract Act - Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4; Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 25(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83 and 83(1); Sale of Goods Act - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1966SC58; [1965]3SCR381

Act, Section 25 (1) of Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Sections 83 and 83 (1) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Sale of Goods Act - respondent no. 2 purchased at public auction sale held by Divisional Forest … reversed the decree and dismissedthe appellant's suit.2. The admitted facts of the case are that on December 24, 1956, respondentNo. 2 purchased at the public auction sale held by the Divisional ForestOfficer, Harda, the cut timber and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1983

Swaroopchandra Garg Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-31-1983

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 55(1); Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyanam) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 19(1) and 22

Reported in : AIR1984MP7

under:--'Section 2 (a): Words and expressions used but not defined in this Act and denned in the Indian Forest Act. 1927 (16 of 1927) shall have the meaninff assigned to them in that. Act.' Now. the Central Act does … estimated to be Rs. 70.000 and that on payment of that sum, the truck would be released under Section 19 (l) (b) of the State Act The petitioner contends that before passing the aforesaid order, the petitioner, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1983

Lakshman and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Grazing Rules, 1979 - Rule 7; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2, 32 and 76; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 301

Reported in : AIR1983SC656; 1983(1)SCALE577; (1983)3SCC275; [1983]3SCR124

Indian is a foreigner in any of the constituent States of India. The plan was this: The Indian Forest Act 1927 enabled the State Government to make rules to regulate the cutting of grass and pasturing of cattle in … constituent States of India. The plan was this: The Indian Forest Act 1927 enabled the State Government to make rules to regulate the cutting of … generally, to carry out the provisions of the Act (Section 76). We may note here'cattle' as defined by Section 2(i) includes buffaloes, sheep, goats and many other specie of browsing animals. We may also note that we

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial