Advanced Search Results

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra … be liable to be deducted from the amount determined as payable to the owner of such private forest. Section 13 provides for an appeal against an order of the Collector under Sections 9, 11 and 12 while Section

Chandra Prakash Khanduja Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Section 379, 411, 414, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 read with Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that

Kamal Kishore and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Gwalior State Forest Act Samvat, 1962 - Sections 5 and 6; Madhya Bharat Forest Act Samvat, 2007 - Sections 86; Madhya Bharat Forest Act Samvat, 1950; Madhya Pardesh Extension of Laws Act, 1958 - Sections 6; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 20A, 20A(1), 20A(2), 20A(4), 26, 33, 68 and 82; ;Madhya Pradesh Forest (Amendment) Act, 1965 - Sections 20; Forest Act, 1905; Madhya Pradesh Extension of Laws Act - Sections 6.1; Indian Forest (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Ordinance, 1964; ;Forests (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2006MP167; 2006(2)MPHT45; 2007(1)MPLJ181

forest.7. In order to save the forest lands, the Legislature has amended and inserted Section 20A in Indian Forest Act, 1927 by State Amendment No. 9 of 1965. It is provided by the amendment that entire lands declared as … also directed that the Committee shall visit all the villages in question referred to in the report dated 13- 9-2004 and identify the forests and submit a report keeping in view the directions of Hon'ble the Supreme

Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3 to 27, 28 and 29 to 34; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 27; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 1 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 4 and 7(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 11; Land Holdings Act, 1972; Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1990SC1833; JT1990(3)SC215; 1990(2)SCALE95; (1990)4SCC320; [1990]3SCR469

the Act shall not apply to any land which is a reserved or protected forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 4 empowers the State Government to prohibit by notification the cutting, felling, gridling, lopping, burning, stripping off the … by the said judgment and decree, the original plaintiff has preferred this appeal by special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution. For the sake of convenience we will refer to the parties by their original position

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 - Sections 1, 4 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31C, 39 and 245

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

officer duly appointed in that behalf by the State Government.' 11. These provisions form part of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as Sections 80 and 81. They provide for the management of forest either by the Government or by … be preceded by a show cause notice of thirty days from the date of receipt to the grantee.24. Section 13 provides for arbitration by a sitting or retired District or High Court Judge appointed by the Government where

The State of Jharkhand Through the Divisional Forest Officer, Dhanbad ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 - Sections 5, 10 13 and 16(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 42, 43, 45, 49, 52, 52A, 52B and 59A(2); Evidence Act; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : [2007(3)JCR503(Jhr)]

(Regulation) Act, 1990 is distinct from the criminal prosecution of the respondent under Section 41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 42 of the Act envisages penalty for breach of rules made under Section 41 of the Act which … 332 logs were seized from the saw mill of the respondent and a confiscation proceeding was initiated under Section 13 of the Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990.3. The brief fact of the case is that on 4.7.1998

KamaruddIn N. Shaikh Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 35(3); Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 5; Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 3, 58 and 61; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR209; (1996)98BOMLR159

with forest produce. 'Forest produce' is not defined in the Act but has been defined under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 2(4) reads as under :'2(4) 'forest-produce' includes ---(a) the following whether found in, or brought from, a forest … 1986 filed by the Maharashtra Land Development Corporation were dismissed by this Court by judgment and order dated 13th/17th March, 1992. This Court arrived at the conclusion that Survey No. 345-A situated at Dahisar, Thane District which

Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh Senior Advocate with Mr. VipIn Vs. Union ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, Section 19 of Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 and Section 12 of Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952.

Yakub Haji Haroon Khan Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 18

Reported in : 1996(2)BomCR42; (1996)98BOMLR42

to the predecessor-in-title of the said respondents and to the said respondent under section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, to the effect that the Forest Department of the 1st respondent intended to protect forest in the lands … said Anand Chintaman Oze and the said respondent filed an appeal before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Bombay, under section 13 of the Private Forest Act and challenged the said order dated 24th September, 1979 passed by the 3rd

State Through Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Parmeshwaran Subrama ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19 and 120B; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6 and 6(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 52(3); Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 8(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B

Reported in : AIR2010SC584; 2009(57)BLJR3150; 2009(242)ELT162(SC); JT2009(12)SC458; 2009(12)SCALE410; (2009)9SCC729; 2009(10)LC4665(SC); 2009(5)LHSC3216; 2009(6)Scale792

Jharkhand High Court held that even though there is no specific provision in Section 52(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as amended by Bihar Act 9 of 1990, a vehicle seized for alleged involvement in commission of forest … and the requirement of previous sanction is only in respect of offences punishable under Sections 7, 10, 11, 13 and 15 of the Act.9. M/s. Krishnan Venugopal, learned senior counsel and Santosh Kumar, learned Counsel for the