Advanced Search Results
Delhi Administration Vs. Mohd. Iqbal
Supreme Court of India
Nov-30-1970
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 7, 132 and 134; Foreigners Act - Sections 14; Foreigners Orders, 1948 - Rule 7(2); Indian Passport Rules, 1950 - Rules 3 and 6;
AIR1971SC472; 1971CriLJ509; (1970)3SCC498; 1971(III)LC91(SC)
he made mens rea but he was guilty of an offence in contravention of Rule 7(2) of the Foreigners Order, 1948 and Section 7(2) of the Foreigners Act.10. Counsel for the respondent invited this Court to-re-assess the facts and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Mahmadkhan Navrangkhan
Mumbai
Sep-23-1958
Criminal
Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 2, 3, 9, 12, 13 and 14; Foreigners (Amendment) Act, 1957; Foreigners Order, 1948 - Rule 7; Constitution of India - Article 7; Citizenship Rules, 1956; Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 18; Indian Passport Act, 1920; British Nationality and Status of Alliens Act - Sections 1(1) and 1(2)
AIR1959Bom359; (1959)61BOMLR164; 1959CriLJ1053; ILR1959Bom875
spite of the expiry of the notice and had therefore committed a breach of Rule 7 of the Foreigners Order, 1948, and Section 13 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, and thus committed and offence punishable under Section 14 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Ibrahim Nabiji
Mumbai
Dec-09-1958
Criminal
Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 12 and 14; Foreigners Laws (Amendment) Act, 1957; Foreigners Order, 1948 - Rule 7; Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 9(2); Citizenship Rules, 1956 - Rule 30; British Nationally and Status of Aliens Act, 1914 - Sections 1(1) and 1(2); Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950; Indian Passport Act, 1920; Foreigners Rules, 1939
AIR1959Bom525; (1959)61BOMLR803; 1959CriLJ1416; ILR1959Bom1323
meaning of the Foreigners -- Laws (Amendment) Act, 1957, and had not obtained under Rule 7 of the Foreigners' Order, 1948, the necessary residential permit and had thereby infringed the provisions of Section 14 of the Foreigners' Act.2. Before
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Wahid Mian Hiddan Mian Vs. the State
Allahabad
Sep-24-1959
CriminalConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 5, 6 and 7; Foreigners Order, 1948 - Rule 7; Foreigners Act, 1948 - Sections 14
AIR1961All111; 1961CriLJ206
presence in India and their departure from India. In exercise of this power the Central Government made the Foreigners Order, 1948. In this case I am concerned only with Rule 7 of the Order, which reads an follows : … ORDERM.C. Desai, J. 1. The applicant has been convicted under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, for the act of not departing from India before the expiry of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Abdul Suttar Haji Ibrahim Patel
Gujarat
Sep-12-1961
CriminalConstitution
Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 2, 9 and 14; Foreigners Order, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 5, 7, 9 and 10; Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5, 8, 9(2) and 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74
AIR1963Guj226; 1963CriLJ265; (1963)0GLR1073
the Registration Officer, Panchamahals for the period ending 12-4-1958 and contravened the provisions of Clause 7 of the Foreigners Order 1948 and thereby committed an offence under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946?(3) What order?'On the first point,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Hanif Khan Vs. State
Allahabad
Sep-08-1959
Criminal
Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 2 and 14; Foreigners Order, 1948 - Rule 7
AIR1960All434
applicant has been convicted under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act for contravention of Rule 7 of the Foreigners Order, 1948. He was born in British India and his parents were residents of British India. He was employed in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEl Mustafa El Fathi Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-07-2004
Criminal
2004CriLJ4796; ILR2004KAR4603; 2004(7)KarLJ495
the learned Metropolitan Magistrate while convicting him for violation of the provisions of paragraph 7(1 )(2) of the Foreigners Order, 1948 punishable under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, took a lenient view considering that the petitioner is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.H. Magermans Vs. S.K. Ghose and ors.
Kolkata
May-19-1965
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 5, 14, 53, 77(2), 166(1), 166(2), 245, 258 and 258(1); ;Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1939 - Rules 3, 7(3) and 13(1); ;Foreigners Act, 1946 - Section 3(2); ;Foreigners Order, 1948; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114; ;Indian Passport Rules, 1950
AIR1966Cal552,70CWN82
(cc), (d) and (f) of Subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, and under the Foreigners Order, 1948. This entrustment by the Central Government was made subject to two conditions mentioned in the said Notification, namely:(a) … a further extension was granted till September 2, 1960. The appellant was served with another order dated September 7, 1960, directing him not to remain in India beyond a period of 15 days from the date of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Abdul Majid and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-23-1959
Constitution
Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 2 and 14; Foreigners Laws (Amendment) Act, 1957; Foreigners Order, 1948 - Sections 7; Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1939
AIR1959Raj131; 1959CriLJ772
(Act XXXI of 1946) (which will hereinafter be referred as the Act) for contravention of Section 7 of Foreigners Order, 1948 (which will hereinafter be referred as the Order). The Sub-divisional Magistrate, Tonk in whose court the accused were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Assam Vs. Nirode Ranjan Dey
Guwahati
Mar-03-1981
Criminal
Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 13 and 14; Foreigners (Restricted Areas) Order, 1963
had mens rea but he was guilty of an offence in contravention of Rule 7 (2) of the Foreigners Order, 1948 and Section 7(2) of the Foreigners Act.'It follows therefore that mens rea is an essential element of such
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »