Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: fire force act 1964 section 38 · Page 1 of about 184 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 31 2023

Mahesh N S Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … uniform standards are not maintained, it could result in catastrophic consequences.43. He would further take the Court through Section 38 placed in Chapter V of the Act whereunder the provision mandates that all such rules legislated by -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2023

Harsha N Vs. The Karnataka Public Service Commission

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … uniform standards are not maintained, it could result in catastrophic consequences.43. He would further take the Court through Section 38 placed in Chapter V of the Act whereunder the provision mandates that all such rules legislated by -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2017

Tek Narayan Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Its Secretary

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-29-2017

Subject : Education

touching, altering or amending the existing rule framed by the 12 State Government under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act,1964 which prescribed the qualifying examination as a condition precedent for promotion. In this context the Hon'ble Supreme Court … 37. Sunil Kumaar Marik, Son of Mahadeo Marik, resident of village- Viraajpur, P.O.- Lilatari, P.S.- Jama, District- Dumka 38. Pradeep Kumar Dey, son of Sishir Kumar Dey, resident of village- Hakikatpur, P.O. Kumirdaha, P.S. Raneshwar, District- Dumka

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 23 2005

Pushpender and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ238CAT

Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.Article 309 of the Constitution has offended to the Statutory Act i.e.Fire Force Act 1964 in Karnataka and clearly laid down the preposition that once a legislation intervenes to an Act relating to … and 'D' shows that these forms are issued pursuant to the requirements of Regulations 3 and 6 and Section 12(2) of the Act which, however, does not by itself determine the nature of the fee in question.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1986

Sheet Metal Workers Vs. Eeoc

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jul-02-1986

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the union guilty of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against nonwhite workers in recruitment, selection, training, and … to eradicate the effects of unlawful discrimination and to make the victims of past discrimination whole. Nor can Firefighters v. Stotts, 467 U. S. 561 , be properly read to prohibit a court from ordering any kind … demand employment. Of greater importance, the Commission will only jeopardize its continued existence if it seeks to impose forced racial balance upon employers or labor unions." Id. pt. 2, p. 29. Page 478 U. S. 456 When … and JUSTICE STEVENS, concluded in Parts IV, V, and VII that: 1. Section 706(g) of Title VII does not prohibit a court from ordering, in … Ladder in Employment Discrimination Doctrine, 20 Harv.Civ.Rights-Civ.Lib.L.Rev. 339, 388 (1985); see also Taylor v. Jones, 653 F.2d

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1968

Gaya Rai Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-28-1968

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1969(1)UJ470(SC)

husband and ran away. These were Fakker, Raj Kumar Rai and Deodhari Rai. The constables of the armed force also came to the spot and she narrated the story to them. She gave her torch to Managar … of Shahabad in Bihar in the night between 10th and 11th June 1964. The said village was only a small hamlet consisting of 20 to … in a letter dated 9th March 1964 (Ex. 38/24). This letter was written by the accused Sheodhar … to meet the arms which might be used against them. All the persons killed had injuries from guns fired from a very close range and some of them had injuries from sharp cutting weapons also. These circumstances … in the charge to do and cause to be done various illegal acts, to wit, to kill Ramkrit, members of his family, his supporters and … in Cr. A. 117 of 1968 guilty under Section 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2008

Harish Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-25-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201, 302, 376 and 436; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT608

of the cooking gas from the window of his kitchen. He could see that there was smoke and fire in the ground floor of the house. He accordingly, informed his friend and rushed towards the ground floor … pointed object like human nails and injuries at No. 2 and 3 were caused by application of blunt force during dragging. The injuries at sl. No. 7 and 8 which were in the female organs were caused, … stains clothes worn by the appellant as well. 38. PW-3 in his cross-examination has clearly mentioned that … must be such as to show that within all human probability the act must have been done by the accused.15. A reference may be made … the learned Judge has held the appellant guilty for the offence under Sections 302/376/436/201 IPC and awarded the sentence of imprisonment for life and to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2002

B.L. Wadhera Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2002

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 5A, 5B, 15 and 15(2); Indian Forest Act; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Gram Panchayat Rules - Rule 34; Punjab Common Lands Act, 1964 - Sections 13; Punjab Village Common (Regulations) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3(1), 3(2), 6, 6(10), 10, 13 and 13A; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 122 and 123; Constitution of India - Article 32; Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972; Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR2002SC1913; JT2002(4)SC271; (2002)3PLR248; 2002(3)SCALE714; (2002)9SCC108; [2002]3SCR226

further alleged that the respondent No.7 had encroached upon 10 acres of land belonging to the Border Security Force. Instead of constructing the Hospital and the Polytechnic for women, for which the land was apparently donated, the … 6 marlas of land to the Trust free of cost under Section 13 of the Punjab Common Lands Act, 1964. It was resolved that the sanction be obtained from the Panchayat Department through Block Development and Panchayat Officer … the watch and ward staff of Bharat Yatra Kendra. Details of the 388 acres 3 canals and 12 marlas are at page 65 to 69

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1985

K.V. Narayanan Namboodiri and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-25-1985

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 25, 26 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 40 and 92; (Kerala) Guruvayoor Devaswom Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5(3), 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 29, 32, 33, 35 and 35(2); Constitutional Law

Reported in : AIR1985Ker160

the pendency of O. P. No. 3 of 1965 a major portion of the temple was destroyed by fire in 1970. A Commission appointed by the Government to enquire into the cause of the fire came to … 1887. The Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1926 came into force on 8-2-1927. A scheme for administration of the temple and its properties … transitory provision for removal of difficulties that may arise in giving effect to the provisions of the Act. Section 38 empowers the Government by notification in the Gazette to make rules to carry out the purposes of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2024

Sri B S Suresh Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-29-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

in C.C.No.56902/2019, registered for offence punishable under Section 285 of the IPC and Section 25 of the Karnataka Fire Force Act, 1964.2. Heard the learned Senior counsel Sri.Sandesh J.Chouta, appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional State Public … Constitution. (U.P. Power Corpn. Ltd. v. Ayodhya Prasad Mishra [(2008) 10 SCC139: (2008) 2 SCC (L&S) 1000]. .) 38. The conclusion reached by us is reinforced by the fact that the Law Commission in Para 24.20 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial