Advanced Search Results
Mahesh N S Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Mar-31-2023
Land Acquisition
of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … of 2021 C/W WP No.17163 of 2021 this regard, he would take the Court through the provisions of Section 33 (2) and more particularly he would impress upon the Court to peruse clause (b) of Sub Section (2)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarsha N Vs. The Karnataka Public Service Commission
Karnataka
Mar-31-2023
Land Acquisition
of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … of 2021 C/W WP No.17163 of 2021 this regard, he would take the Court through the provisions of Section 33 (2) and more particularly he would impress upon the Court to peruse clause (b) of Sub Section (2)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitizens Forum for Mangalore Development Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Dec-13-2016
Land Acquisition
since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … 2014; Section 11 321-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and Section 187-A of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, as unconstitutional, illegal and ultravires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; The further prayer sought … twenty five percent of permissible floor area ratio in respect of non- 33 is residential buildings shall be regularized and different maximum limit may be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.B. Bansilal Abirchand Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. the Labour Court, Nagpur an ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-25-1971
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 3 to 9, 10(1), 25C, 25E, 25J, 33C, 33C(2) and 33E; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
AIR1972SC451; [1972(24)FLR169]; 1972LabIC285; (1972)ILLJ231SC; (1972)1SCC154; [1972]2SCR580; 1972(4)LC291(SC)
employ about 1000 men. The mill was owned by the firm, the appellant in the Second appeal. A fire broke out in the mill on March 27, 1959 doing appreciable damage to some of the machines. The … September 30, 1960. The Labour Court held by order dated February 29, 1964 that there had been a lay-off within the meaning of Section 2(kkk) … 5(2) read with Section 5(1) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 to the effect that it had bean forced to close its factory as from the 1st of July 1958 by the action of the Bombay Government … Labour Court had jurisdiction to entertain the application for lay-off compensation under 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The appellant in the first appeal is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.V. Narayanan Namboodiri and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Kerala
Mar-25-1985
Trusts and SocietiesConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 25, 26 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 40 and 92; (Kerala) Guruvayoor Devaswom Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5(3), 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 29, 32, 33, 35 and 35(2); Constitutional Law
AIR1985Ker160
the pendency of O. P. No. 3 of 1965 a major portion of the temple was destroyed by fire in 1970. A Commission appointed by the Government to enquire into the cause of the fire came to … 1887. The Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1926 came into force on 8-2-1927. A scheme for administration of the temple and its properties … things done under the Act by the Government or the Commissioner except as expressly provided in the Act. Section 33 confers a power of revision on the Government in respect of the proceedings of the Commissioner or the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatyavir Singh Rathi Vs. State Thr. C.B.i.
Supreme Court of India
May-02-2011
Land Acquisition
has placed reliance on Jamuna Singh & Ors. vs. Bhadai Shah AIR 1964 SC 1541 and Prof. Sumer Chand vs. Union of India & Ors. … and other by Inspector Anil Kumar, joined forces. The car was immediately surrounded by the police officials who fired from almost all sides killing Pradeep Goyal and Jagjit Singh instantaneously and causing grievous injuries to Tarunpreet Singh. … the two police parties, one headed by ACP Satyavir Singh Rathi and other by Inspector Anil Kumar, joined forces. The car was immediately surrounded by the police officials who fired from almost all sides killing Pradeep Goyal … a watch near the Mother Dairy Booth in Patparganj and he was actually present at that place when Tarunpreet Singh and Jagjit Singh met Pradeep … FIR No. 448/97 dated 31st March 1997 under Sections 186/353/307 of the IPC and Section 25 of … Singh vs. State of U.P. 2004 (5) SCC 334 had over-ruled the judgment in Lokendra Singh's case
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitizens Forum for Mangalore Development, Represented by its Joint Co- ...
Karnataka
Dec-13-2016
Land Acquisition
since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … and certain other laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 Section 76FF Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 Section 321-A Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 187-A Constitutional validity of statute and provisions Petitioners sought to declare 2013 Act, 2009 Act and 2014 Rules … is made a nullity through the decision of a Court of law. 33. It would be pertinent for us to observe at this stage that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitizens Forum for Mangalore Development, Represented by its Joint Co- ...
Karnataka
Dec-13-2016
Land Acquisition
since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … Rules 2014; Section 321-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and Section 187-A of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, as unconstitutional, illegal and ultravires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; The further prayer sought … is made a nullity through the decision of a Court of law. 33. It would be pertinent for us to observe at this stage that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTirlochan Singh Vs. Chander Badan Singh and anr.
Delhi
Mar-05-1976
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417
ILR1976Delhi149
ribs due to their connexions and shape are able to withstand great force, yielding under pressure and recovering themselves like a spring' ? A.I agree. … before the committing Magistrate and even during chief examination. Between the years 1964 and 1970 he was involved in several cases involving violence ranging between … examined during the course of the inquiry. Even though cross-examination may have been permitted to such a situation section 33 of the Evidence Act would have no application. Section 33 reads as follows : '33.Evidence given by a … of the clothes of the deceased from behind near the collar. A.1 took out his .45 revolver and fired abullet at Inder Singh which hit him on the left side at his back. Inder Singh took his
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.L. Wadhera Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-19-2002
CivilProperty
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 5A, 5B, 15 and 15(2); Indian Forest Act; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Gram Panchayat Rules - Rule 34; Punjab Common Lands Act, 1964 - Sections 13; Punjab Village Common (Regulations) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3(1), 3(2), 6, 6(10), 10, 13 and 13A; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 122 and 123; Constitution of India - Article 32; Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972; Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1976
AIR2002SC1913; JT2002(4)SC271; (2002)3PLR248; 2002(3)SCALE714; (2002)9SCC108; [2002]3SCR226
further alleged that the respondent No.7 had encroached upon 10 acres of land belonging to the Border Security Force. Instead of constructing the Hospital and the Polytechnic for women, for which the land was apparently donated, the … 6 marlas of land to the Trust free of cost under Section 13 of the Punjab Common Lands Act, 1964. It was resolved that the sanction be obtained from the Panchayat Department through Block Development and Panchayat Officer … moved this Court alleging that Bhondsi Gram Panchayat, by a Resolution, gifted 33 acres of Gram Panchayat land to respondent No.7 for construction of a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »