Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: fire force act 1964 section 31 · Page 1 of about 329 results (0.042 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 29 2017

Tek Narayan Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Its Secretary

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-29-2017

Subject : Education

touching, altering or amending the existing rule framed by the 12 State Government under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act,1964 which prescribed the qualifying examination as a condition precedent for promotion. In this context the Hon'ble Supreme Court … Dumka 30. Chandramohan Bhaatacharya, son of Nonigopal Bhattacharya, resident of village- Silajori, P.O.- Jaitara, P.S.- Raneshwar, District- Dumka 31. Manoj Kumar Rajhans, son of Jaidev Rajhans, resident of village- Dhari, P.O.- Tasria, P.S.- Masalia, District- Dumka 32.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2003

M. Kesavulu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-18-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Education Service Rules; Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 - Sections 75, 76 and 78; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1995 - Sections 22 and 30; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD522

it would not have the effect of displacing or altering the Rules made under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act, 1964 as the Act of the Legislature would have precedence over any Rule made by the Executive under the … School and Zilla Parishads were made Gazetted through G.O. Ms. No. 308, dated 19.9.1992 and G.O. Ms. No. 316, dated 19.9.1992. These posts have been now included in the Andhra Pradesh Educational Service Rules issued in G.O.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1992

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corpo ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-1992

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Petroleum Act, 1934 - Sections 4 and 31; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 394; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 254 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 8; Petroleum Rules, 1979 - Sections 2 and 8; Fire Service Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1993Bom54; (1992)94BOMLR194

judgment of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Caltex (India) Ltd. v. The Director, West. Bengal Fire Services, : AIR1960Cal219 . The ratio of the said decision also proceeds on the basis that even if … to the conclusion that the said Petroleum Act was a law in force in the territory of India before the commencement of the Constitution which … appeal, namely, whether the operation of Section 394 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 stands limited/restricted by Section 31 of the Petroleum Act, 1934. 3. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows: (a) Bharat

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 02 1986

Sheet Metal Workers Vs. Eeoc

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jul-02-1986

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the union guilty of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against nonwhite workers in recruitment, selection, training, and … membership goal. EEOC v. Local 638, 565 F.2d 31 (1977). Petitioners again chose not seek certiorari from … to eradicate the effects of unlawful discrimination and to make the victims of past discrimination whole. Nor can Firefighters v. Stotts, 467 U. S. 561 , be properly read to prohibit a court from ordering any kind … demand employment. Of greater importance, the Commission will only jeopardize its continued existence if it seeks to impose forced racial balance upon employers or labor unions." Id. pt. 2, p. 29. Page 478 U. S. 456 When … and JUSTICE STEVENS, concluded in Parts IV, V, and VII that: 1. Section 706(g) of Title VII does not prohibit a court from ordering, in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1968

Gaya Rai Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-28-1968

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1969(1)UJ470(SC)

husband and ran away. These were Fakker, Raj Kumar Rai and Deodhari Rai. The constables of the armed force also came to the spot and she narrated the story to them. She gave her torch to Managar … of Shahabad in Bihar in the night between 10th and 11th June 1964. The said village was only a small hamlet consisting of 20 to … and Ramraj Ahir, P. Ws. 8, 26 and 31 respectively and Ramkrit, her husband's brother, P. W. … to meet the arms which might be used against them. All the persons killed had injuries from guns fired from a very close range and some of them had injuries from sharp cutting weapons also. These circumstances … in the charge to do and cause to be done various illegal acts, to wit, to kill Ramkrit, members of his family, his supporters and … in Cr. A. 117 of 1968 guilty under Section 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2016

Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development, Represented by its Joint Co- ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … and certain other laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 Section 76FF Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 Section 321-A Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 187-A Constitutional validity of statute and provisions Petitioners sought to declare 2013 Act, 2009 Act and 2014 Rules … and the notification issued, in Part-IV-A of the Karnataka Extraordinary Gazette dated 31.12.2013 vide Annex-B publicizing the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Regulation of unauthorised

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2016

Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development, Represented by its Joint Co- ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … Rules 2014; Section 321-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and Section 187-A of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, as unconstitutional, illegal and ultravires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; The further prayer sought … and the notification issued, in Part-IV-A of the Karnataka Extraordinary Gazette dated 31.12.2013 vide Annex-B publicizing the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Regulation of unauthorised

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2016

Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … 2014; Section 11 321-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and Section 187-A of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, as unconstitutional, illegal and ultravires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; The further prayer sought … and the notification issued, in Part-IV-A of the Karnataka Extraordinary Gazette dated 31.12.2013 vide Annex-B publicizing the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Regulation of unauthorised

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2025

Durga Prasad versus Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-23-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1572

inaction on the part of the police force - The plea of the Charged Officer that shots were fired not with a view to injure but to disperse the mob, is a bona fide plea, which does … S.C.R.Supreme Court Reportsof the provisions of rule 3 of CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964, against Sri Durga Prasad, the Charged Officer. Signed RP Rai Inquiring Authority … plan to indulge in rioting came to the knowledge of the Charged Officer but he took no preventive action - This Court is of the considered view that it would be too harsh upon the appellant to … of documentary evidence produced to prove the charges are the order under section 144 CrPC (exhibit S1), curfew order (exhibit S 2), Deputy Commissioner, Delhi’s … deployed; and (e) no preventive arrests effected between 31.10.1984 and 01.11.1984 - As regards observation of not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1979

General Manager, Northern Railway Vs. Central Government Labour Court ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-22-1979

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1979)IILLJ317P& H

under any law relating to investigation and settlement of industrial disputes in force in any State.23. Under Section 33C(1) before its substitution in 1964 it … the Act was enacted by Act No. 36 of 1956 and was substituted by Act No. 36 of 1964. Section 33C, as it stood before its substitution in 1964, read:33C. Recovery of money due from an employer.--(1) Where … provided under the Act. In Madura Mills Co. Ltd. v. Guruvammal (1966) 31 F.J.R. 73, a learned single Judge of the Madras High Court held … in support of his contention further relied upon Sitabai v. Auto Engineers (1971) 40 F.J.R. 124 (Bom), Jharia Fire-Bricks and Pottery Works Pvt. Ltd. v. Bhrigo Nath Sharma (1977) 51 F.J.R. 288 (Pat), Central Inland Water Transport

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial