Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: fire force act 1964 section 28 · Page 1 of about 386 results (0.093 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 29 2024

Sri B S Suresh Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-29-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

in C.C.No.56902/2019, registered for offence punishable under Section 285 of the IPC and Section 25 of the Karnataka Fire Force Act, 1964.2. Heard the learned Senior counsel Sri.Sandesh J.Chouta, appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional State Public … 2 are before this Court calling in question the proceedings in C.C.No.56902/2019, registered for offence punishable under Section 285 of the IPC and Section 25 of the Karnataka Fire Force Act, 1964.2. Heard the learned Senior counsel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2017

Tek Narayan Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Its Secretary

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-29-2017

Subject : Education

touching, altering or amending the existing rule framed by the 12 State Government under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act,1964 which prescribed the qualifying examination as a condition precedent for promotion. In this context the Hon'ble Supreme Court … 27. Mohd. Rafiq Alam, son of Luksaan Ansari, resident of village- Morbhanga, P.O. Morbhanga, P.S.- Dumka, District- Dumka 28. Sukhdeo Mandal, son of Manohar Mandal, resident of village- Nawadih, P.O.- Nawadih, P.S.- Jama, District- Dumka 29. Ananat

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2023

Mahesh N S Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Chapter II under which power is vested in the Union and he would then take the Court through Section 28 whereby, certain powers are vested in the State to make rules. Similarly, he would point out to Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 2023

Harsha N Vs. The Karnataka Public Service Commission

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Chapter II under which power is vested in the Union and he would then take the Court through Section 28 whereby, certain powers are vested in the State to make rules. Similarly, he would point out to Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1975

Executive Committee of Vaish Degree College, Shamli and ors. Vs. Laksh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-1975

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 20 and 34; University Act; Industrial Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311

Reported in : (1976)IILLJ163SC

the employer : it would enshrine the power of wealth by recognising the right of the employer to fire an employee by paying him damages which the employer can afford to throw away but which would be … the university in exercise of the statutory power and have, therefore, the force and effect of law. It follows, therefore, that the 'College Code' creates … Principal of the college on permanent basis with effect from July 1, 1964 and his appointment as Principal was formally approved by the Vice-Chancellor of … event, the termination was ineffective and inoperative as it was not approved by the Vice-Chancellor as required by Section 28, sub-section (3) of the Kanpur and Meerut Universities Act, 1965, and in either case, whether the first respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1999

S. Pappa and ors. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-30-1999

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1999)3MLJ347

rules would not have the effect of displacing or altering the Rules made under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act, 1964 as the Act of the Legislature would have precedence over any Rule made by the Executive under the … vested with the Governor to grant relaxation of the requisite qualification as prescribed in G.O.Ms.No. 720, Education, dated 28.4.1981. In view of the said contention, the learned Government Pleader was directed to produce the file of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2005

Pushpender and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ238CAT

Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.Article 309 of the Constitution has offended to the Statutory Act i.e.Fire Force Act 1964 in Karnataka and clearly laid down the preposition that once a legislation intervenes to an Act relating to … and 'D' shows that these forms are issued pursuant to the requirements of Regulations 3 and 6 and Section 12(2) of the Act which, however, does not by itself determine the nature of the fee in question. … any manner to any changes in qualification etc., vide their letter dated 28.7.2004, the respondents are estopped from taking a plea of mistake. As reasons

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1982

Tradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-02-1982

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR608

patrolling and watch and ward work but occasionally they were compelled to fight situations like thefts, assaults and fire. It was also noticed by Government that under the present system they were not entitled to any protection … 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the Mathadi Act). The Act came into force on June 13, 1969 and applied to the employments specified in the … be shown hereafter.30. Section 27 provides for the quantum of penalty for the offence under the said Act. Section 28 gives protection to the State Government or the Board or its Chairman or other Officers from any legal … in The Corporation of Calcutta v. Calcutta, Tram-way Co, Ltd., Calcutta : 1964CriLJ354 in this connection. It is difficult to understand as to what support

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1985

Sujatha Touring Talkies and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-13-1985

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 19(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6) and 245; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rule, 1971 - Rules 96(5), 96(5A) and 107; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation)(Amendment) Rule, 1984

Reported in : AIR1986Kant21; ILR1985KAR2477

approval of plan of building, approval of building construction and issue of Licence buildings and installations; Electrical Installations; fire fighting, maintenance of premises; re-grant of licence; special provisions in the case of certain cinematograph exhibitions and miscellaneous … of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 (Central Act 37 of 1952) were in force in the respective integrating areas, which by S. 119 of the SR … Rules, 1971 as amended from time to time (for short 'the Rules') framed under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act'). They have challenged the validity of Rr. 96(5), 96(5-A) and 107 of the Rules … 62 (S.O. No. 479) dt. 6-3-1971 and S. 1(3) of the Act). Section 23 of the Act repealed the previous enactments that were in force … C. P. C.FINAL ORDER OF DIVISION BENCH D/- 28-6-1985.Puttaswamy, J. 158. All the petitioners except the petitioners

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2016

Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development, Represented by its Joint Co- ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … and certain other laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 Section 76FF Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 Section 321-A Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 187-A Constitutional validity of statute and provisions Petitioners sought to declare 2013 Act, 2009 Act and 2014 Rules … of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned notification dated 28.05.2014 vide Annex-A titled the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Regularisation of Unauthorised

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial