Advanced Search Results

State of U.P. and Others Vs. Smt. Shakuntala Shukla, S.i., Police

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 73, 154, 162, 240, 243, 309, 311, 313, 366(10), 372, 372(1) and 395; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 2, 7, 12, 39 and 46 (2) and (3); Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Criterion for Recruitment by Promotion Rules, 1994 - Rules 2, 4 and 5; Indian Independence Act, 1947; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 94 (3) and 241; Karnataka Civil Services (General) Recruitment Rules, 1977; Karnataka Civil Services (General) Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1982; Fire Force Act, 1964; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3 (51); Government of India Act, 1870; Government of India Act, 1915; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18G; Removal of Difficulties Orders; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921;

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2574; (1999)3UPLBEC1702

called upon to resolve the conflict between special rules made by the State Government under Section 39 of Fire Force Act. 1964 thereby laying down that promotion to the post of Leading Firemen would be based on qualifying examination as … General Clauses Act, it can be said that the regulations, which have been made as rules under Sections 12 and 46(2), will partake of the character of rules. It may be observed that generally power to make

Shri A.B. Krishna and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Fire Force Act, 1964 -- Sections 39; Mysore Fire Force (Cadre Recruitment) Rules, 1971; Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1971; Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977; Constitution of India -- Article 14, 16, 309, 310 and 311

Reported in : 1998IIAD(SC)45; AIR1998SC1050; JT1998(1)SC613; (1998)IIIMLJ73(SC); 1998(1)SCALE496; (1998)3SCC495; [1998]1SCR157

ORDERS. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Section 39 of the Fire Force Act, 1964 under which Mysore Fire Force has been established gives rule-making power to the State Government, in exercise of

Manash Kumar Tripathy and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

are laid down.7. -------------- .8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Ghosh 7. Humanyu Kabir 8. Kewal Mandal 9. Md. Ali Ahmad 10. Dinanath Thakur 11. Sish Mohammad Ansari 12. Bipin Kumar Saha 13. Md. Manul Mandal 14. Asish Kumar Mandal 15. Sapan Kumar Saha 16. Uttam Kumar

Manoranjan Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

are laid down.7. -------------- .8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Ghosh 7. Humanyu Kabir 8. Kewal Mandal 9. Md. Ali Ahmad 10. Dinanath Thakur 11. Sish Mohammad Ansari 12. Bipin Kumar Saha 13. Md. Manul Mandal 14. Asish Kumar Mandal 15. Sapan Kumar Saha 16. Uttam Kumar

Jharkhand Rajya Gram Raksha Dal Through Its General Secretary Sanjay K ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

are laid down.7. -------------- .8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Ghosh 7. Humanyu Kabir 8. Kewal Mandal 9. Md. Ali Ahmad 10. Dinanath Thakur 11. Sish Mohammad Ansari 12. Bipin Kumar Saha 13. Md. Manul Mandal 14. Asish Kumar Mandal 15. Sapan Kumar Saha 16. Uttam Kumar

Mohan Murari Singh and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

are laid down.7. -------------- .8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Ghosh 7. Humanyu Kabir 8. Kewal Mandal 9. Md. Ali Ahmad 10. Dinanath Thakur 11. Sish Mohammad Ansari 12. Bipin Kumar Saha 13. Md. Manul Mandal 14. Asish Kumar Mandal 15. Sapan Kumar Saha 16. Uttam Kumar

Mohan Lal Bhagat and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

are laid down.7. -------------- .8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Ghosh 7. Humanyu Kabir 8. Kewal Mandal 9. Md. Ali Ahmad 10. Dinanath Thakur 11. Sish Mohammad Ansari 12. Bipin Kumar Saha 13. Md. Manul Mandal 14. Asish Kumar Mandal 15. Sapan Kumar Saha 16. Uttam Kumar

Ajay Kumar Gope Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

are laid down.7. -------------- .8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Ghosh 7. Humanyu Kabir 8. Kewal Mandal 9. Md. Ali Ahmad 10. Dinanath Thakur 11. Sish Mohammad Ansari 12. Bipin Kumar Saha 13. Md. Manul Mandal 14. Asish Kumar Mandal 15. Sapan Kumar Saha 16. Uttam Kumar

Pushpender and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ238CAT

Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.Article 309 of the Constitution has offended to the Statutory Act i.e.Fire Force Act 1964 in Karnataka and clearly laid down the preposition that once a legislation intervenes to an Act relating to … and 'D' shows that these forms are issued pursuant to the requirements of Regulations 3 and 6 and Section 12(2) of the Act which, however, does not by itself determine the nature of the fee in question. It

Sri. Nikhil Barua vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 285 OF IPC, 1860 AND SECTION 25 OF KARNATAKA FIRE FORCE ACT, 1964 AS FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A, CONSEQUENTLYQUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.57216/2019 ARISING OUT … said to be a negligent or rash act done to endanger SLP (Crl.) No.5485 of 2021 decided on 12-05-2022 -6- human life. Thus, the essential ingredients of the offence were absent. In our considered opinion, the wellreasoned