Advanced Search Results
Niko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Gujarat
Mar-26-2015
Land Acquisition
the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') which was introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act 2009. In these proceedings the constitutional validity of the amendment to sub-Section (9) of Section 80-IB and Explanation added … unforeseen or unforeseeable financial burden imposed for the past period. Avani Exports v. Income Tax (2012) 348 ITR 391. (ii) Only retrospective amendments which are in the nature of a Validating Acts which seek to validate the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Gujarat
Mar-26-2015
Land Acquisition
the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') which was introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act 2009. In these proceedings the constitutional validity of the amendment to sub-Section (9) of Section 80-IB and Explanation added … unforeseen or unforeseeable financial burden imposed for the past period. Avani Exports v. Income Tax (2012) 348 ITR 391. (ii) Only retrospective amendments which are in the nature of a Validating Acts which seek to validate the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Karnataka vs M/S Vaswani Estates Developers
Karnataka
Apr-17-2026
REVISION PETITION No.2 OF 2022 IN STRP No. 181/2018 BETWEEN:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ADITYA VIKRAM BHAT, AGA) AND:1. M/S VASWANI ESTATES DEVELOPERSPRIVATE LIMITED, … FOR SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS STRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 65(1) OF THE KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT., 2003 AGAINST THEJUDGMENT DATED 28.04.2017 PASSED IN STA.Nos.971 TOTRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEALS AND UPHOLDING THE … COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) 1.6, DVO-1, BENGALURU FOR THE TAX PERIODS YEAR 2009-10.IN STA No.9/2022 BETWEEN:1. M/S H. M. INFRATECH PVT. LTD, No.14, H. M. … OF COMMERCIAL TAXES [ENFORCEMENT]-14, SOUTH ZONE, BENGALURU UNDER SECTION 69[1] R/W SECTION 39[1] OF THE ACT FOR 12 TAX PERIODS FROM APRIL 2006 TO MARCH-2007,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Somesh Thapliyal Vs. Vice Chancellor H.n.b. Garhwal University
Supreme Court of India
Sep-03-2021
Education
the same is accompanied with demand draft of Rs.200/- (Rs.100/- only for Uttaranchal SC candidates) in favour of Finance Officer HNB Garhwal University. The application completed in all respects along with attested testimonials in support of qualification, … On 15th January, 2009, the University was converted into a Central University and is governed by Central Universities Act, 2009(hereinafter being referred to as the “Act 2009”).4. B. Pharma course which was offered by the Department of Pharmacy … University was a State University governed by the Act 1973 established under Section 4(1) of the Act. On 15th January, 2009, the University was converted … VICE CHANCELLOR, H.N.B. GARHWAL UNIVERSITY & ANR. ….RESPONDENT(S) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION(C) NOS. 291-294 OF2021IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3922-3925 OF2017JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. The present batch of … OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3922-3925 OF2017SOMESH THAPLIYAL & ANR. ETC. ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS VICE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-10-2018
Land Acquisition
Counsel for Mr. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate) And:1. The State of Karnataka Represented herein by the Principal Secretary - Finance Department, Government of Karnataka Vidhana Soudha, Bengaluru-560 001. …Petitioner 2. Date of Judgment 10-01-2018 W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters … the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: … filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to declaring that Section 10(3) of the KVAT Act has already been read down by the this Hon’ble Court in such a manner that the Petitioner is … CAS Order No.229761714 (Annexure ‘C’), passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 39(1) read with Section 36(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendra Road Lines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Up, and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-02-2010
Company
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 17(1), 17(4), 5A, 9(1), 4, 6, 17 (3A), 4 (1), 48, 3, 40 (1) (b), 49, 43 ; Land Acquisition for Companies Rules, 1963 - Rule 4 ;
granting final approval. The recommendations of the Commission were scrutinised by the Finance and Law Department and were found to be in order. The cost … road, to acquire fertile agricultural land. The Writ Petition No. 31314 of 2009, Nand Kishore Gupta and others vs. State of UP and others, was … also can be touched. This Section which is in Part VII of the Act clearly excludes applicability of Section 39 to 42, based on which non performance of various formalities, has been argued. If under the acquisition, Government … need a fast moving road connection to reach Agra to cut down the travelling time. The National Highway No.2 on the western bank of Yamuna passes through busy areas in the State of Haryana and Rajasthan, through
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMechano Paper Machines Ltd. Vs. Nepc Papers and Boards Ltd. and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-15-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 38, 39(4), 60, Order 21 Rules 3 and 48; Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617,; Government of India Act, 1915 - Section 108; Constitution of India - Article 225
learned Single Judge who passed the order impugned in a subsequent decision in the case of Srei Equipment Finance Ltd v. Khyoda Apik and another disposed of on May 12, 2011 in EC no. 142 of 2009 … instance of a judgment-debtor and is directed against order dated April 06, 2011 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which His … Section 39(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the learned executing Court acted without jurisdiction inasmuch as, this Court has no jurisdiction to attach or … this Court. 3. The only question raised by the appellant in this appeal is that in view of Section 39(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the learned executing Court acted without jurisdiction inasmuch as, this Court has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR Vs. Mackle
UK Supreme Court
Jan-29-2014
Land Acquisition
Schedule 1 to the Act. Such duty becomes payable at an "excise duty point". Section 1(1) of the Finance (No 2) Act 1992 provides that: "¦ the Commissioners may by regulations make provision, in relation to any duties of excise … as is authorised by law. Section 10(3A) of the 1980 Act (as inserted by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, section 141(2)) provides that where the Court of Appeal exercises its power under subsection (3) to quash a confiscation … goods at the excise duty point. As Aikens LJ said at para 39 of Bajwa the "upshot" of the relevant decisions on regulation 13 is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMechano Paper Machines Ltd. Vs. Nepc Papers and Boards Ltd. and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-15-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Sections 39, 38, 60, 42; Companies Act 1956 - Section 617; Constitution of India - Article 225
learned Single Judge who passed the order impugned in a subsequent decision in the case of Srei Equipment Finance Ltd v. Khyoda Apik and another disposed of on May 12, 2011 in EC no. 142 of 2009 … instance of a judgment-debtor and is directed against order dated April 06, 2011 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which His … Section 39(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the learned executing Court acted without jurisdiction inasmuch as, this Court has no jurisdiction to attach or … of this Court. The only question raised by the appellant in this appeal is that in view of Section 39(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the learned executing Court acted without jurisdiction inasmuch as, this Court has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.K. Vijaya, Akhil Furniture Works Vs. Intelligence Officer-1 and
Kerala
Mar-05-2010
Sales Tax/Vat
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 11, 12, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 35, 45 and 45A; ;Business Profit Tax Act; ;Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Section 11(2); ;Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
contention that the period of 4 years limitation prescribed under Sub-section (2)(a) of Section 11 of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 shall be incorporated into the revisional and appellate powers of the authorities, the Hon'ble … Apex Court in the Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd. and Anr. v. Excise and Taxation Officer and Anr. (1977) 39 STC 19. In the said decision repelling the contention that the period of 4 years limitation prescribed under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »