Advanced Search Results
Punadipadu Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. D ...
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-21-2009
ServiceTrusts and Societies
Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 6, 9A, 9B, 9C, 12A, 13, 15A, 16, 17, 19, 21, 21A, 21AA, 23, 31(1), 32(3), 32(7), 34, 34A, 50, 51, 52, 53, 60, 62, 62(3), 64, 66, 70, 71, 73, 76 and 117; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960; Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act, 1894 - Sections 1; Married Women's Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 53; Nisi Rules
2009(6)ALT228
or officer or servant may have incurred criminal liability by his act.16. Further it is averred that respondent No. 2 filed O.A. No. 70 of 2004 on the file of the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Vijayawada, and the said … or society aggrieved by any 5 decision passed or order made under Section 6, Section 9A, Section 9B, Section 9C, Section 12A, Section 13, Section 15A, Section 16, Section 17, Section 19, Section 21, Section 21A, Section 21AA, … writ petition immediately after the second respondent appeal being allowed due to financial strain and loss to the society. In view of the Debt Relief
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Tax Payers Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Feb-17-2006
Service Tax
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66, 68, 68(1), 70, 71A and 83; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 1B, 9C, 9D, 11, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F, 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 66, 669(1) and 68; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 83; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 9C, 9D, 11, 11B, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F to 35O, 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D and 40; Service Tax Rules, 1997 - Rules 2, 12 and 17
(2006)205CTR(Mad)360; 2006[4]STR14
he is the person liable for paying the service tax in relation to such service.Section 83 of Finance Act, 2004 : Application of certain provisions of Act 1 of 1944. The provisions of the following sections of the … may be, in relation to service tax as they apply in Excise:- 9C, 9D, 11, 11B, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12E, 12C, 12D, 12B, … in Laghu Udyog Bharathi v. Union of India struck down the service tax as amended in 1997 (Rule 2(d)(XII) and (XVII) which are in conflict with Section 65 and 66; that the defects pointed out by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAutomotive Tyre Manufactureres. Vs. the Designated Authority and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-07-2011
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Section 130E, 129; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sectio 9A, 9C; Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 62
(2011)2SCC258
judicial deference. Commending us to the decision of this Court in Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. & Ors.31, learned counsel urged that while interpreting a legislation, the Courts should have … preliminary findings and issued public notice in that behalf on 30th June 2004, vide Notification No. 14/20/2003-DGAD, recommending imposition of provisional anti-dumping duty at the … of the High Court of Kerala, and directing the parties to pursue the remedy before the Tribunal under Section 9C of the Act. 16. As afore-mentioned, the Tribunal has dismissed the appeals, preferred by ATMA, Apollo Tyres, J.K. … Act") arises out of a common judgment and order, dated 9th September 2005, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-25-2024
Land Acquisition
the Union”. Earlier, it read as “for regulation of mines and the development of minerals” but by Section 2 (Act 38 of 1999), the above amendment was made. 10.2 The relevant provisions of the MMDR Act, 1957 could
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskApar Industries Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Finance, the
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-04-2006
MRTP
(2006)(110)ECC153
raw material and that the conversion cost has been faultily arrived at. It is also the contention that finance cost like interest etc were also arrived by taking a faulty basis. The learned advocate strongly contends that … 1. The appellant - Domestic industry has challenged the final findings dated 27th July 2004 and the impugned notification issued on 28th September 2004 under … support of the other petitioner this appeal is liable to be dismissed. He relied upon the provisions of Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act and submitted that right to appeal has been granted to "any person" and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Babu Rao and ors. Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies/Of ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-05-2005
BankingTrusts and Societies
Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 6, 9A, 9B, 9C, 12A, 13, 15A, 16, 17, 19, 21, 21A, 21AA, 23, 32(3), 32, 34, 34A, 56, 58, 60, 61, 61(1), 64, 66, 70, 70(2), 71, 71(1), 71(2), 71(3), 73, 76, 77, 78, 80, 115A, 115B, 117, 121 and 133; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 1970; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules; Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act, 1995 - Sections 36, 36A and 37; Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors and Financial Establishments Act, 1999; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1969; Banking Companies Act, 1949; Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 42; Banking Laws (Application to Co-operative Societies) Act, 1965; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 3,
2005(4)ALD582; 2005(4)ALT327; [2005]126CompCas708(AP); [2005]63SCL339(AP)
for determination in these writ petitions, notice was issued to the Union of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs (Banking Division). Sri M. Ratna Reddy, learned counsel representing the Central Government, on instructions, … lakhs towards the debt due to the Vasavi Bank, W.P.No. 18535 of 2004 was filed. A learned single Judge of this Court by the order … person or society aggrieved by any decision passed or order made under Section 6, Section 9A, Section 9B, Section 9C, Section 12A, Section 13, Section 15A, Section 16, Section 17, Section 19, Section 21, Section 21 A, Section … in any of these writ petitions; except that in W.P.No. 5605 of 2000 the provisions of Section 71 of the 1964 Act are challenged.4. On
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskReliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-11-2006
Customs
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 9, 9A, 9A(1), 9A(2), 9A(6), 9B(1), 9B(2) and 9C; Customs Tariff (Second Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 9A; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1); Customs Act, 1962; Customs Rules; Customs Regulations; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA and 9A(8); Finance Act 2004 - Sections 9A(8); Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 4, 5(1), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 6(7), 7, 7(2), 7(3), 10, 11, 11(3), 12(2), 15(4), 17, 17(4) and 18(1); Anti Dumping Law
2006(202)ELT23(SC); JT2006(12)SC478; 2006(9)SCALE124; (2006)10SCC368
of Section 9A was inserted by the Finance Act 2000 and that Act also inserted Section 9AA. Finance Act 2004 amended Section 9A(8).6. In this connection it may be mentioned that up to 1947 there was very little … duty was imposed on exports from the other countries.4. The appellant filed an appeal before the CEGAT under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 against this Notification seeking enhancement of duty in the case of the … J.1. This Appeal has been filed against the impugned final order dated 29.11.2000 passed by the (CEGAT) Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...
Chennai
Nov-30-2012
Education
by the petitioner at the time of the passing of the Final Findings. While so, the Ministry of Finance had imposed provisional Anti-Dumping Duty, by issuing Customs Notificaiton No.32/2012-Customs (ADD), dated 7.6.2012. It is clear from the … it may be open to the petitioners to challenge the levy of Anti-Dumpting Duties, if any, as per Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, by filing an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate … (Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhel (R and D) Employees Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Co-oper ...
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-03-2004
Trusts and Societies
Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 60, 76 and 120; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2005(2)ALD112
their explanation and thereafter, the enquiry was taken up. While so, on behalf of the petitioner society LA. No. 2 of 2004 was filed before the second respondent seeking to summon Smt. T. Lakshminarayana, General Manager (P&A;) and … person or society aggrieved by any decision passed or order made under Section 6, Section 9A, Section 9B, Section 9C, Section 12A, Section 13, Section 15A, Section 16, Section 17, Section 19, Section 21, Section 21 A, Section … pending surcharge proceedings under Section 60 of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act 1964 (for short 'the Act'), an appeal is maintainable under Section 76
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyani Steel Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority/Ministry
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-02-2006
Land Acquisition
(2006)(110)ECC676
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 challenging the Customs Notification No. 69/2005-Cus.dated 19.7.2005 issued by respondent No. 1, Ministry of Finance withdrawing anti-dumping duties in terms of the recommendation of the respondent designated authority by its final findings dated … 1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant domestic industry under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 challenging the Customs Notification No. 69/2005-Cus.dated 19.7.2005 issued by respondent No. 1, … the recommendation of the respondent designated authority by its final findings dated 20.5.2005.2. Earlier, anti-dumping duties were imposed by notification dated 25.6.2001 on the basis
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »