Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance no 2 act 2004 section 98 · Page 1 of about 1,511 results (0.150 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 27 2013

The Director of Income Tax (international Taxation Vs. Goodyear Tire a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-27-2013

Subject : Education

of an equity oriented fund to the Mutual Fund.3. The charge of securities transaction tax is given in section 98 of Chapter VII of Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, which, to the extent relevant, is quoted hereunder:98. On and … income-tax in view of the specific provisions of section 10(38) read with Chapter VII of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 . We may point out that Chapter VII of the said Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 pertains to securities

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2016

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Herbalife International India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-13-2016

Subject : Direct Taxation

payment made to residents and non-residents have to be the same. (b) Prior to its amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 Section 40 (a) (i) of the Act provided for disallowance of payments made to non-residents where tax is not … by the RBI. (m) Reliance is placed on the decisions in Nonsuch Tea Estate Ltd. v. CIT (1975) 98 ITR 189 (SC), Dorr-Oliver (India) Ltd. v. CIT (1998) 234 ITR 723 (Bom), and Pfizer Corporation v. CIT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2004

NitIn P. Shah Alias Modi Vs. Dy. C.i.T.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-16-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1), 66, 67, 69, 119, 131, 132, 139(1), 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BC, 158BD, 251, 271(1) and 276CCC; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1) and 68(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Guj)306; [2005]276ITR411(Guj)

Matched in: Advocate S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Adv.,; Swati Soparkar, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1 in Tax Appeal No. 539 of 2003 and Manish R. Bhatt, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 in Tax Appeal No. 539 of 2003 and Special Civil Application Nos. 3605 and 3960 of 2004,;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 27 2007

Amit Estate Organizer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Aug-27-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)113TTJ(Ahd.)1018

the basis of report obtained under such reference. Section 142A has been introduced in the statute book by Finance No. 2 Act, 2004 with retrospective effect from 15th Nov., 1972, according to which for the purpose of making an assessment or … taken by the Tribunal, Rajkot Bench in the case of Asstt. CIT v. Nalanda Housing Development Ltd. (2005) 98 TTJ (Rajkot) 518 wherein it was held that after insertion of Section 142A with retrospective effect from 15th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2007

Dr. Ramesh Kumar Anand Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Decided on : Mar-09-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

on the other hand, referred to the amendment introduced in the Act by inserting Section 142A by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 with retrospective effect from 15-11-1972 and submitted that such reference to valuation cell for ascertaining the cost of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2006

Hanemp Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)101ITD19(Delhi)

be bad in law, in view of the provisions of Section 142A of the Act inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 with retrospective effect from 15.11.1972.11. We are now left with the argument of the learned Counsel for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2005

Umiya Co-operative Housing Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Mar-10-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)94TTJ(Ahd.)392

ITR 331 (Bom).4. The learned Departmental Representative, on the other hand, referred to. Section 142A inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, with retrospective effect from 15th Nov., 1972. He contended that all the decisions relied upon by the assessee's

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2004

Uttam Air Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-28-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99TTJ(Delhi)718

aforesaid claim of the assessee was on account of the provisions of Section 32(2) as substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act of 1996, which was effective from 1st April, 1997. According to the AO, the scope of the amendment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2006

Macintosh Finance Estates Ltd. Vs. Additional Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-27-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Tribunal order in this case was passed on 14-1-1999 whereas Section 14A was inserted with retrospective effect by Finance Act, 2001 and hence Section 14A was not available before the Tribunal. In view of above discussion, we … opportunity of being heard to the assessee. This ground is partly allowed for statistical purposes.8. As per ground No. 2, it is contended that the interest expenses incurred for holding shares as investment be added to the cost … its own stock and on sale of the same in assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06, the income is offered to tax as business income and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2006

Brook Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. the Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Mar-10-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)105ITD146(Pune.)

(Del) 101. The question before the Hon'ble Tribunal was whether in view of amendment in Section 32 by Finance (No.2) Act, 1996, with effect from 01.04.1997, unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years could be allowed to be set-off … assessee pointed out that the assessee is primarily engaged in the export business and such export constituted about 98.8% of its total turnover. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to deduction Under Section 80HHC. Such deduction was claimed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial