Advanced Search Results

N & N Chopra Consltants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner, Goods ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the amount of service tax shown in para 70.1 against them under Section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 read with Section 66 of the Act; I confirm the demand of SHEC amounting to Rs.29,370/- (Rupees twenty

Amit Estate Organizer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)113TTJ(Ahd.)1018

the basis of report obtained under such reference. Section 142A has been introduced in the statute book by Finance No. 2 Act, 2004 with retrospective effect from 15th Nov., 1972, according to which for the purpose of making an assessment or

Saroj Sales Organisation Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)115TTJ(Mum.)485

5 per cent of the limit prescribed, it is pointed out that this sub-section was amended by the Finance (No. 2} Act, 2004 w.e.f.1st April, 2005. Prior to its substitution the section granting 100 per cent deduction of income arising from

State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

The Finance Act, 2003 brought 8 new services within the ambit of service tax. Further, the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 brought 13 new services under service tax which included reintroduction of service tax on 3 services and also … introduced for the first time by the Finance Act, 1994. Under Section 64(3), Chapter V of the Finance Act applied to taxable services as defined, … therefore, no sales tax could be levied.4. The Tribunal referred to Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution of India, Section 2(30) of the Act, its earlier decision in Hindustan Club Ltd. v. CCT [Hindustan Club Ltd. v. CCT,

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Nalanda Housing Development Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)98TTJ(Rajkot.)518

as reference to the Valuation Officer is concerned, Section 142A has been introduced in the statute book by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 with retrospective effect from 15th Nov., 1972, according to which for the purpose of making an assessment or … i.e., "Sanjay Apartment", Rajkot. The DVO has assessed the cost of construction during the previous year at Rs. 64,85,006 as against the cost of construction. declared by the assessee at Rs. 39,33,779. It is observed that the

Standard Chartered Bank and ors. Etc. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 232(3), 232(3)(1), 276B, 276C, 277, 278 and 278B; Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Bill, 1972; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 35HA(3); Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 7, 11, 62, 417 and 420; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 56(1); Monopolies and Restricted Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 48A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235; Monopolies and Restricted Trade Practices (Amendment) Act, 1984 ; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 13, 19(1), 44(2), 18(1), 18A, 50, 51, 56, 57 and 58; Companies Act, 1956; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women & Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Act No. 34 of 1976; Employees Provident Fund Act; Genera

Reported in : AIR2005SC2622; 2005(4)ALD10(SC); III(2005)BC119(SC); [2005]125CompCas513(SC); (2005)4CompLJ464(SC); 2005(3)CTC39; (2005)195CTR(SC)465; 119(2005)DLT687(SC); 2005(100)ECC457; (2005) 4 SCC 530

on 16th September, 2003. Section 278B was promptly amended by Parliament by insertion of sub-section (3) by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 1.10.2004. The inserted sub-section (3) reads as under:'278B (3) Where an offence under this Act has been

M/S. Tikaula Sugar Mills Limited Vs. Cit Muzaffarnagar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

believe". The Tribunal referred to the amendment made in section 142-A in Income Tax Act by Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 retrospectively w.e.f. 15.11.1972 providing under sub-section (1) that where an estimate of the value of any investment is

Manager Tata Aig General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Nagnath Govindrao ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent herein is the original complainant. For better understanding the appellant in appeal No. 648/2008 which is a finance company hereinafter referred as œOpponent finance company?, whereas the appellant in appeal No. 836/2008 which is, Tata AIG … i.e. complainant and he was already proceeded ex-parte. Adv.Shri.Sandeep Gaikwad holding for Adv.Shri. Chapalgaonkar appearing for the respondent No. 2 was present. The counsel Shri. Karlekar for the appellant as well as Shri. Chapalgaonkar for the respondent No. … It was further submitted that as per Sec. 64 VB of Insurance Act, 1938, no insurer is supposed to assume any risk unless the premium … members of the said policy. It was further submitted that as per Sec. 64 VB of Insurance Act, 1938, no insurer is supposed to assume

NitIn P. Shah Alias Modi Vs. Dy. C.i.T.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1), 66, 67, 69, 119, 131, 132, 139(1), 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BC, 158BD, 251, 271(1) and 276CCC; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1) and 68(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Guj)306; [2005]276ITR411(Guj)

Matched in: Advocate S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Adv.,; Swati Soparkar, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1 in Tax Appeal No. 539 of 2003 and Manish R. Bhatt, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 in Tax Appeal No. 539 of 2003 and Special Civil Application Nos. 3605 and 3960 of 2004,;

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

provided in the tender document which is not only arbitrary but also violative of Rule 182 of General Finance Rules, 2017 which envisages for an estimation of reasonable expenditure. It is submitted that consultation NIT sought to … PETITION (CIVIL) No.922/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1041/2020 1 JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.TABLE OF CONTENTS S.No.TOPIC PARAS1 Introduction 1 2. Objectives of the Project 2-10 3. Proceedings and Contentions of the 11-123 Parties Consideration 4. Rule of Law … (paras 24 to 26)]. 63 2013 SCCOnline NGT101(para38) 64 (2006) 3 SCC549(paras 66 to 69, 72 to … and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use