Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance no 2 act 2004 section 32 · Page 1 of about 2,990 results (0.253 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 21 2013

Tamil Nadu Cricket Association Vs. Director of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-21-2013

Subject : Education

the Commissioner to cancel the registration granted under the stated circumstances, reads as under:- Provision inserted under Finance Act, 2004: Section 12AA(3):- Where a trust or an institution has been granted registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) and … Dated :21. 10.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal).No.450 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 --- The Tamil Nadu Cricket Association No.5, M.A.Chidambaram Stadium Victoria Hostel Road Chepauk, Chennai-600

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2007

Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit, Range-1

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

which stands clarified by the insertion of the proviso therein under the Finance Act, 2003. As such, the assessee cannot claim any benefit of Section … of the assessee for both the assessment years under consideration is allowed.8. Now we shall deal with Ground No. 2 of the appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2000-01 pertaining to the issue of the assessee's claim … at a point of time when deduction is to be granted for the purpose of wear and tear (section 32) or an incentive for the purpose of setting up a specified industry (sections 32A and 33). The term

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2004

Uttam Air Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-28-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99TTJ(Delhi)718

aforesaid claim of the assessee was on account of the provisions of Section 32(2) as substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act of 1996, which was effective from 1st April, 1997. According to the AO, the scope of the amendment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 10 2006

Brook Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. the Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Mar-10-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)105ITD146(Pune.)

(2004) 84 TTJ (Del) 101. The question before the Hon'ble Tribunal was whether in view of amendment in Section 32 by Finance (No.2) Act, 1996, with effect from 01.04.1997, unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years could be allowed to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2016

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Herbalife International India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-13-2016

Subject : Direct Taxation

payment made to residents and non-residents have to be the same. (b) Prior to its amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 Section 40 (a) (i) of the Act provided for disallowance of payments made to non-residents where tax is not … around the interpretation of Article 26 (3) of the DTAA and Section 40 (a) (i) of the Act. 32. Article 26 (3) of the DTAA reads as under: Except where the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

Yfc Projects P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

Vistar Constructions (P) Ltd Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

Skyline Engineering Contracts (India)(P) Ltd Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

G.D.Buildtech P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2016

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-07-2016

Subject : Service Tax

was brought under the purview of service tax with effect from 10th September, 2004 by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004. The petitioner is making payment of service tax as per law and filing return regularly. (4) The levy … the petitioner was basically engaged in civil engineering construction and was not ‘consulting engineer’ within the meaning of Section 65(11) of the Finance Act, 1994. (as amended by Finance Act, 1997).(6) Thereafter, the respondent did not proceed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial