Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Herbalife International India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

payment made to residents and non-residents have to be the same. (b) Prior to its amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 Section 40 (a) (i) of the Act provided for disallowance of payments made to non-residents where tax is not … Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT (2007)288 ITR 408 (SC), DIT v. Morgan Stanley and Co. (2007) 292 ITR 416 (SC), Asia Satellite Tel. Co. Ltd. v. DIT (2011) 332 ITR 340 (Del) and CIT v.

Yfc Projects P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Vistar Constructions (P) Ltd Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

G.D.Buildtech P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

The Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Madurai Vs. M/s. Strategi ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Service Tax

plant, machinery or equipment". This came into effect on 01.07.2003. 11. By Section 90 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, Section 65(28) was omitted and a new section 65(39a) was inserted with effect from 10.09.2004. This Section 65(39a) read

N & N Chopra Consltants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner, Goods ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the amount of service tax shown in para 70.1 against them under Section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 read with Section 66 of the Act; I confirm the demand of SHEC amounting to Rs.29,370/- (Rupees twenty

Skyline Engineering Contracts (India)(P) Ltd Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004)(via)(via) the Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with … of the Cenvat Credit taken on tower, shelter, prefabricated building and other for the period in dispute:-YearsTowerShelterOthersTotal2004-05174368801478938Chair - 298,738Printer - 1,224,53720,439,1002005-0644142943 441429432006-071591920315384719 313039222007-082658803428174029 54762063Total104087060450376861523282150648028 16. Mr. Sridharan, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the Appellant has made

Shree Choudhary Transport Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

from 2006-07. We, however, do not subscribe to the view so canvassed by the assessee. The Finance (No.2) Act 2004 has brought an amendment in Section 40 of the Act making it applicable w.e.f. 01/04/2004 (sic)8. Since this … the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur has summarily dismissed the appeal against the order dated 29.08.2008 passed in ITA No.117/JU/2008 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench at Jodhpur; and thereby, the High

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

exemption from tax. The holding period of 3 months has been subsequently increased to 9 months by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 with effect from 1-4-2005. Assuming that the provisions of section 94(7) were not retrospective and only prospective in … the assessee company filed return of income for assessment year 2001-2002 disclosing total income at Rs. 57,31,610 on 29-10-2001. The assessing officer completed assessment under section 143(3) on 31-3-2003 at total income of Rs. 2,58,46,553. During the