Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance no 2 act 2004 section 16 · Page 1 of about 6,268 results (0.174 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 17 2009

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

of 2001);(vi) the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under Section 91 read with Section 93 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004);(vii) the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the … Contingent duty leviable under Section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Clause 161 of the Finance Bill, 2003, which clause has, by virtue of the declaration made in the said Finance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

G.D.Buildtech P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

Yfc Projects P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 2014

Vistar Constructions (P) Ltd Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

Skyline Engineering Contracts (India)(P) Ltd Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

dated 20.06.2003. To enlarge the scope of this taxable service, aforesaid provisions were amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2014

The Commissioner of Income Tax-16 Vs. M/s Happy Home Enterprises and A ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-2014

Subject : Direct Taxation

or after 1st April, 2005. The date 1st April, 2005 is of some significance because by Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 1st April 2005, section 80-IB(10) was substantially amended and clause (d) was inserted therein, that stipulates that … to certain assessment years ending with the assessment year 1943-44 where the period for carrying forward was shorter. Section 16 of the finance Act, 1955, amended s.24(2), and as a result of the amendment s. 24(2)(iii) provided that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2014

Commissioner of Custom, Icd, New Delhi Vs. M/S. Chandra Prabhu Interna ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

refunds under Section 27 also applicable to anti-dumping duty), was CUSTOM. A. 3/2013 Page 5 inserted by Finance Act, 2004, and that the amendment thereto by Finance Act, 2009 applicable retrospectively with effect from 01.01.1995 will apply in … 2006 was thus made within the limitation period. CUSTOM. A. 3/2013 Page 16 15. It is pertinent to note that the decision in Sneh Enterprises … the respondent (hereafter “the assessee”) paid anti-dumping duty under protest CUSTOM. A. 3/2013 Page 1 in respect of 27 bills of entry under Customs Tariff Heading No.390390 (under the Customs Tariff Act - hereafter “CTA”) for import

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2005

Rajendran Vs. University of Calicut

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-21-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Act; Calicut University Act, 1975 - Sections 2(27) and 57; High Court Rules - Rule 148

Reported in : 2005(4)KLT32

could be disposed of by a common judgment, as the issue raised is common. W.P.(C) No. 36201 of 2004 is filed by two individuals, who are respectively the Principal of a self-financing College affiliated to the University … The consistency of teachers is to comprise of 16 teachers from private colleges, 5 teachers from Government … No. 11697 of 2005 had no doubt about the position that such of the teachers of the self financing colleges had no right or place to be included in the electoral rolls. The claimants thereupon had occasion … objections within the appointed time. As per the provisions of the University Act, a teacher whose appointment had not been approved by the University, could … to the Senate.9. Teacher is defined in the Calicut University Act, by Section 2(27) as following:'(27). 'teacher' means a principal, professor, associate professor, assistant professor,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2007

Cce Vs. Nahar Industrial Enterprises

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-07-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR26

Finance Act, 2005 can only be utilized only for the payment of such duties. Vide Section 88 of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, it has been provided that the credit of AED(GSI) paid on or after 1.4.2000 shall be allowed to … goods if such capital goods are removed as such; or (d) an amount under Sub-rule (2) of Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 2002; or There are certain restrictions on utilization of Cenvat credit of different rules.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2009

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gulam Mohammad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-19-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2010]320ITR168(All)

for respondent assessee.3. Relying on the provisions of Section 142A of the Act which was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, with effect from November 14, 1972, the learned standing Counsel submits that the Tribunal committed an error of … Maida Bazar, Kanpur, proceeding under Section 147/148 of the Act, was initiated and vide his order dated December 16, 1997, the Assessing Officer added the difference in the valuation made by the Departmental Valuation Officer and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial