Advanced Search Results

Kumaran Silk Trade (P) Ltd. Vs. Devendra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136; ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19; ;Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Sections 113A; ;Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 2000; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 2001; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2007SC1185; 2007(1)AWC768(SC); 2007(1)MhLj909; 2006(10)SCALE426; (2006)8SCC555

been followed by another Bench of which one of us (H.K. Sema, J.) was a party in Suseel Finance & Leasing Co. v. M. Lata and Ors. 2004 (13) SCC 675 wherein this Court held that a … Madras in Writ Petition Nos.18898 of 2000 and other connected matters striking down the amendments brought about to Section 113A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 by Amending Acts 31/2000, 17/2001 and 7/2002 and … P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.SLP(C) No 17771 of 2006 (CC No. 7240 of 2006)1. This petition for special leave to appeal

Dhanpal Baburao Chougule and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(76)(Bom.) 168). The issue before this Court was regarding service of notice under Section 30 of the State Finance Corporation Act. In view of the aforesaid binding precedent of the Division Bench of this Court, the said … Shah, A.V. Bhat v. State of Maharashtra In Writ Petition No.7846 of 2004 decided on 2nd May 2005. The issue involved in this Petition never … Authority, Development Authority, or as the case may be, 1(any Appropriate Authority may, except as otherwise provided in section 113A) 2(acquire the land,- (a) by an agreement by paying an amount agreed to, or (b) in lieu of

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to be ‘or’ by the Explanation that has been brought about by way of the amendment made vide Finance (No.2) Act, 2019. It has been submitted that such an act would also be unconstitutional, as being enlarging … Consideration • The 2002 Act 19-22 • Preamble of the 2002 Act 23-24 • Definition Clause 25-36 • Section 3 of the 2002 Act 37-55 • Section 5 of the 2002 Act 56-70 • Section 8 of

Jayesh Dhanesh Goragandhi. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Chapters 5, 7, Sections 126, 72(3) (18), 74, 89, 59, 88, 125, 72, 88(a), 2(9), 126(2)(3); Town Planning Act, 1919; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 (CPC) - Order 7 Rule 11(d); Land Acquisition Act; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5, 12, 14

plan or scheme under the MRTP Act, the concerned authority may, with the exception of the provisions of Section 113A of the State Act, i.e. land designated under the Act connected with the development of the new town, … Act, 1954. The Municipal Corporation vide its notification dated 10.12.1959 published its intention to vary the scheme. On 21.01.1961, the scheme was approved and published and original plot No.9 was renumbered as final plot No. 44. The