Advanced Search Results

Jones (Respondent) Vs. Ministry of Interior Al-mamlaka Al-arabiya as S ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Land Acquisition

v Dreyfus (1877) LR 5 Ch D 605, 618-619; Zoernsch v Waldock [1964] 1 WLR 675, 692; Propend Finance Pty Ltd v Sing (1997) 111 ILR 611, 669; R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex p … any relevant respect ambiguous or obscure: it is, as Ward LJ observed in Al-Adsani v Government of Kuwait (No 2) (1996) 107 ILR 536, 549, "as plain as plain can be". In the ordinary way, the duty of … 2. On 6 June 2002 Mr Jones, the claimant in the first action giving rise to this appeal, issued High Court proceedings against two defendants: … rise to this appeal. They issued High Court proceedings on 12 February 2004 against four defendants. The first two defendants were sued as officers in … four defendants in the second. The Law 7. Section 1(1) in Part 1 of the 1978 Act

Senior Depot Manager, Indian Oil Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)(224)ELT335Tri(Bang.)

Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), (ii) the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 111 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 (21 of 1998), and (iii) the special additional excise duty leviable under Section 147 of the Finance … the duties of excise were not being levied during the period commencing on the 1st day of July, 2004 and ending with the 3rd day of August, 2004. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

exemption from tax. The holding period of 3 months has been subsequently increased to 9 months by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 with effect from 1-4-2005. Assuming that the provisions of section 94(7) were not retrospective and only prospective in … 182 (Cal.) and Bombay High Court in the case of Mahendra Sintered Products Ltd. v. CIT, 177 ITR 111 ((Bom). He argued that in the case of Best & Co., the Honble Supreme Court had laid down

M/S. Central Cables Limited and Others Vs. the Union of India, Through ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2011 (M/s. GMMCO Limited vs. Union of India thr. Ministry of Finance, New Delhi and Ors.) is also pressed into service. Lastly, it is … DurgaEnterprises (P) Ltd. vs. Principal Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh, reported at 2004 Law Suit (SC) 971, ZuariEstate Development and Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. … Managing Director personally and Rs.15,000/- on Purchase Officer of Petitioner No.1 “ Company. The Managing Director is Petitioner No.2 before this Court while the Purchase Officer is Petitioner No.3. Respondent No.1 is the Union of India while … said order, Respondent No.3 confiscated a machine (capital goods) Gravi Mix Magruire WSB 420, valued at Rs.5,21,396/- under Section 111(d) and (f) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and in terms of its

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

exemption from tax. The holding period of 3 months has been subsequently increased to 9 months by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 1.4.2005. Assuming that the provisions of Section 94(7) were not retrospective and only prospective in effect, those … 182 (Cal.) and Bombay High Court in the case of Mahendra Sintered Products Ltd. v. CIT, 177 ITR 111 ((Bom). He argued that in the case of Best & Co., the Hon'ble Supreme Court had laid down

Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai Vs. M.M.K. Jewellers and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11A, 18, 28, 28AB, 28(1), 28(2), 28(3), 72(1), 108, 111, 112, 114, 114A, 130E, 135, 135A, 140 and 143(3); Finance Act, 2000

Reported in : 2008(127)ECC1; 2008(153)LC1(SC); 2008(225)ELT3(SC); 2008(4)SCALE417; (2008)5SCC617; 2008AIRSCW2353

below in the 'Table' to clause 10 of Notification No. 177/94 and as clarified by the Ministry of Finance vide letter F.No. 305/91/94FTT dated 11.10.1994.No further loss is permitted on the repairs of the imported products as … the sake of convenience, the facts of Civil Appeal Nos. 813-814 of 2004 are recapitulated as under:The respondent M/s M.M.K. Jewellers is a unit in … the conditions of the aforesaid Customs Notification and, consequently, appear to have rendered themselves liable for confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962.6. It, therefore, prima facie indicates that the respondent did or omitted to do

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

110 (2013) 6 SCC476(paras 50, 51, 66 and70) 111 2003 (2) BCLR128(CC) (South African Constitutional Court) 112 … provided in the tender document which is not only arbitrary but also violative of Rule 182 of General Finance Rules, 2017 which envisages for an estimation of reasonable expenditure. It is submitted that consultation NIT sought to … PETITION (CIVIL) No.922/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1041/2020 1 JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.TABLE OF CONTENTS S.No.TOPIC PARAS1 Introduction 1 2. Objectives of the Project 2-10 3. Proceedings and Contentions of the 11-123 Parties Consideration 4. Rule of Law … and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use

Hassan Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

tariff which has to be made by the Commission involves a very highly technical requiring working knowledge of finance, commerce, economics and management. It would be more appropriate and effective if a statutory appeal is provided to … Chaudhari for the petitioner contended as follows: (i) that even though petitioner has a remedy of Appeal under Section 111 of Act, 2003 against the order of the KERC dated 17.12.2018, petitioner has not chosen to invoke alternative … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.1633 OF2019(GM-KEB) PETITIONERBETWEEN : … under Para 5.16. (i) VOLTAS LTD Vs STATE OF AP reported in 2004(11) SCC569(para.20) 20. Thus time for payment can be extended. But if such

Tetra Pak (i) Ltd. and Shri Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2005)(190)ELT257Tri(Mum.)bai

were submitted in support :Sr. No. Particulars a) Affidavit in original executed by Shri. Mahadev Desai, General Manager, Finance of Ecoplast Ltd affirming that whatever quantity of Nucrel received from Terra Pak has been converted into K-film … passage from Principles of Statutory Interpretation by Guru Prasad Singh (Ninth Edition 2004) Chapter 4 page 266 ... Evolution of statute is relevant to interpret … the same order, by which the Commissioner has denied the benefit of notification 30197-Cus dated 1.04.97, 57/2000-Cus dated 27.04.2000 & 43/2002-Cus dated 19.04.2002 availed by TIPL & confirmed a demand duty of Rs. 1,39,98,148/- and imposed penalty … and imposed penalty of equivalent amount under Section 114A of the Customs Act 1962 along with interest under Section 28AB. Since goods were not available … as found by Commissioner and violation of Section 111(c) of the Customs Act, 1962 was attracted and

Ranu Bhandari Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 - Sections 2(30); Motor Vehicle Rules; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(39), 110, 111(O) and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 22(5), 222(5) and 226

Reported in : 2006(92)DRJ768

VIII dated 15.12.2005 issued against him by Sh. R.K. Gupta, Joint Secretary (COFEPOSA), Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi. The aforesaid order is issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign … Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 with a view to prevent the detenu from smuggling goods in future. 2. The petitioner justifies her locus standi as she is the wife of the detenu, rightly interested in the … contravention of provisions of Exim Policy 1997-2002, 2002-2007 and Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09 and Customs Notification No. 40/2000 Customs, 55/2003 Customs and 97/2004 Customs. Shri … Customs exemption Notifications which rendered these vehicles liable for confiscation under Section 111(O) of the Customs Act, 1962. Accordingly, various acts of omission & concession