Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance no 2 act 2004 section 1 · Page 1 of about 8,673 results (0.317 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 05 2005

Standard Chartered Bank and ors. Etc. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-2005

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 232(3), 232(3)(1), 276B, 276C, 277, 278 and 278B; Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Bill, 1972; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 35HA(3); Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 7, 11, 62, 417 and 420; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 56(1); Monopolies and Restricted Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 48A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235; Monopolies and Restricted Trade Practices (Amendment) Act, 1984 ; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 13, 19(1), 44(2), 18(1), 18A, 50, 51, 56, 57 and 58; Companies Act, 1956; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women & Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Act No. 34 of 1976; Employees Provident Fund Act; Genera

Reported in : AIR2005SC2622; 2005(4)ALD10(SC); III(2005)BC119(SC); [2005]125CompCas513(SC); (2005)4CompLJ464(SC); 2005(3)CTC39; (2005)195CTR(SC)465; 119(2005)DLT687(SC); 2005(100)ECC457; (2005) 4 SCC 530

on 16th September, 2003. Section 278B was promptly amended by Parliament by insertion of sub-section (3) by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 1.10.2004. The inserted sub-section (3) reads as under:'278B (3) Where an offence under this Act has been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2009

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Aar Pee Apartments P. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-28-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 142A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 55A, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 131, 142A and 142A(1)

Reported in : [2009]319ITR276(Delhi); [2010]188TAXMAN39(Delhi)

DVO for determining the cost of construction was not justified even after insertion of Section 142A by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, with retrospective effect from November 15, 1972 ?3. Learned Counsel for the parties are ready to argue. Accordingly, … arise for consideration:(a) Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 19,69,881 made by the Assessing Officer and adopting the figure of cost of construction of Yusuf Sarai Project at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2009

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

of 2001);(vi) the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under Section 91 read with Section 93 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004);(vii) the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the … is engaged in the business of manufacturing motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These motor vehicles are cleared on payment of duty. Assessee claimed CENVAT credit on 'input' in accordance with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 2006

Kunhi Mohammad Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-25-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 8; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(39), 108, 127B and 137 ; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 71

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4352; 2006(3)KLT795

compounding the offence under Section 137 of the Customs Act, 1962 as amended by Section 71 of the Finance (No. 2) Act 2004. It is specifically stated in Ext.P11 application for compounding by the co-accused as follows:On 6-12-20041 have been served … who was detained in Central Prison, Thiruvananthapuram in pursuance to an order of detention bearing No. 5017/SSAl/05/home dated 14-3-2005 issued by the Government of Kerala. Kunjhippa was ordered to be detained under Section 3(1)(i) to (iii) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2005

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sudhish Kumar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69, 142A, 143(1), 143(2), 145 and 153A; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004

Reported in : (2005)195CTR(Del)77; [2005]276ITR563(Delhi)

the Tribunal to the contrary, are vitiated in law. Section 142A of the Act was introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act of 2004 and was given a retrospective effect w.e.f. 15.11.1972 but with an exception added to the Section … the property, subject matter of the present writ petition.2. The assessed had filed return for the assessment year 1996-97 declaring a total income of Rs.59,210/- which was processed under Section 143(1)(a) on 31st March, 1998 on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2008

Saroj Sales Organisation Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)115TTJ(Mum.)485

5 per cent of the limit prescribed, it is pointed out that this sub-section was amended by the Finance (No. 2} Act, 2004 w.e.f.1st April, 2005. Prior to its substitution the section granting 100 per cent deduction of income arising from … 1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee arising out of the order dt.28th March, 2007 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2008

Oxford Academy for Career Development Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-04-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(All)606

or withdraw such registration. He submitted that Section 12AA(3) came into force w.e.f. 1st Oct., 2004, by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004. The said provision reads as under:12AA. Procedure for registration.-...(3) Where a trust or an institution has been granted … petition has been preferred against the impugned order dt. 9th March, 2004, passed by the CIT under Section 12A of the IT Act, 1961, where he has cancelled the registration granted earlier on 1st April, 1999, for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2006

Sneh Enterprises Vs. Commnr. of Customs, New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 3, 3(6), 9A and 9A(8); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15, 15(1), 15A, 46 and 68; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 26 and 76

Reported in : 2006(202)ELT7(SC); JT2006(8)SC587; 2006(9)SCALE95; (2006)7SCC714; 2006(2)LC1171(SC)

fact that Sub-Section (8) of Section 9A was introduced in the year 2004 by reason of Finance (No.2) Act, 2004.Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned Additional Solicitor General, however, would submit that in view of the judgment of this Court … in Taiwan for being used in Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) were imported by the appellant at Mumbai on 16.4.2002. The goods were trans-shipped from Mumbai to Delhi. The Bill of Entry, however, was filed by the appellant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2006

Surbhi Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Decided on : Dec-05-2006

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2007)(208)ELT578AAR

(levied under Finance Act, 2005) and Education Cess (EC) @ 2% of aggregate of all duties (levied under Finance(No. 2) Act, 2004). Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.02 as amended exempts 'Duty of Excise' levied under the First Schedule and the … 1. In this application under Section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short "the CE Act"), the applicant, M/s Surbhi Industries, a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2020

Shree Choudhary Transport Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-29-2020

Subject : Direct Taxation

from 2006-07. We, however, do not subscribe to the view so canvassed by the assessee. The Finance (No.2) Act 2004 has brought an amendment in Section 40 of the Act making it applicable w.e.f. 01/04/2004 (sic)8. Since this … Maheshwari, J.Preliminary …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT1 By way of this appeal, the assessee-appellant has called in question the order dated 15.05.2009 passed in Income Tax Appeal No.164 of 2008 whereby, the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial