Advanced Search Results
Secy. Federn. of Bus-operators Assn. of T.N. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Apr-30-2001
Service TaxMotor Vehicles
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 35(38), 65, 65(38), 65(48), 65(50), 65(51), 65(52), 66, 66(3) and 67; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(22), 2(25), 2(40), 2(43), 49, 51, 58(1), 58(2), 65, 65(32), 65(38), 65(44), 65(48), 65(50) to 65(52), 65(62), 67, 68, 70, 71, 72, 72(2), 72(9), 73, 74, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87(1), 88(8), 88(9), 88(11), 88(14) and 89; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 63(1), 63(6) and 68; Central Excise Act, 1944; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1996; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1997; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1998; The Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 82 to 85 and 128; Motor Vehicles Permit for All India Tours Rules, 1993; Fina
2001(134)ELT618(Mad); 2006[2]STR411; [2007]6STT49
and 'Pager Services'. Further widening was effected by including 12 additional services in Finance Act, 1997. Ultimately, in Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, 12 more 'services' were defined under Section 65(48) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1994 under the head … Petitioners who are 'Stage Carriage Operators' owning a 'spare bus' covered under a 'spare bus permit' as per Section 72(2)(xvii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.(II) Petitioners who are 'Contract Carriage Operators', owning the vehicles covered under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Federation of Tax Practitioners and ors. Vs. Union of India ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-21-2007
Service TaxConstitution
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(16), 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73 and 83; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 9C, 9D and 11B; Income Tax Act, 1961; Medicinal Act, 1955; Kerala Abkari Act; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 142A; Uttar Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1995; Andhra Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987; West Bengal Luxury Tax Act, 1994; Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 245, 246, 246(1), 246(3), 248, 265, 268A, 269, 276, 276(1), 276(2), 276(3) and 366(29A)
AIR2007SC2990; (2008)5CompLJ488(SC); (2007)211CTR(SC)449; 2007(120)ECC451; 2007LC451(SC); [2007]293ITR406(SC); JT2007(10)SC305; (2007)6MLJ1062(SC); 2007(10)SCALE178; 2007(7)SCC527
the Central Government objecting to the aforestated Bill. On 1.8.1998 the Finance Bill was however passed and the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 received the assent of the President of India. The Act came into force with effect from 1.4.1998. On … of taxable services. Section 68 dealt with collection and recovery of service tax. Section 71 dealt with assessment. Section 72 dealt with best judgment assessment. Section 73 dealt with value of taxable services escaping assessment. Section 83 inter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Damodar Narcinva Naik, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.,
Mumbai
Sep-15-2005
Customs
Customs Act, 1998 - Sections 46, 59, 61(2), 71, 72 and 61; ;Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 88 and 89
2006(1)ALLMR657; 2006(1)BomCR224; 2006(1)MhLj761
the pendency of the said appeal filed by the Revenue before CEGAT, the Central Government by Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 introduced KVSS. Section 88 of the said Finance Act which is relevant for the purpose herein reads as … duty demand of Rs. 7,74,591/- and interest of Rs. 11,03,909/-aggregating to Rs. 18,78,500/- under Section 61 read with Section 72 of the Customs Act. 8. The petitioners once again filed an appeal and the Commissioner of Customs (A)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kiran Corporation Vs. the Asstt. C.i.T.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Nov-24-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)102TTJ(Ahd.)375
of the case law on the subject and taking into consideration Explanation appended below Section 37(1) by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 with retrospective effect, it has been held that the twin facet of the issue viz.genuineness as well as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDavi SarIn Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra
Jun-10-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)84ITD391Agra
rest the controversy as to whether block assessment subsumes the regular assessment or is independent of the latter, Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, has inserted the clarificatory Explanations with retrospective effect from 1st July, 1995, after Sub-section (2) of Section 158BA … Mittal and information supplied to S.H.O. Itmad-daula, police authorities took action and recovered the amount aggregating to Rs. 72.60 lakh from the alleged looters including Ashok Tyagi, Devendra Tyagi and Mukesh Tyagi. However, in the meantime the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMid East Port Folio Management Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Aug-14-2003
Land Acquisition
(2003)87ITD537(Mum.)
of sale and lease back. He invited our attention to Expln. 4A to Section 43(1) introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996, w.e.f. 1st Oct., 1996. Our attention was also drawn to the Memorandum explaining the amendment which is … of the sale and lease back arrangement. After a few reminders, RSEB filed a letter dt. 17th Feb., 1998, clarifying the following : 1. The booking of the capitalised cost of plant, machinery and equipment is in … Ltd. (1967) 66 ITR 692 (SC) and CIT v. B.M. Kharwar (1969) 72 ITR 603 (SC). This approach has been reiterated recently by the Gujarat
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFenoplast Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Apr-03-2000
Direct Taxation
(2002)82ITD178(Hyd.)
the provisions of the Expln to Section 158BA inserted with retrospective effect from 1st July, 1995 by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, it is claimed that this is only a protection to the assessee inasmuch as it prohibits the inclusion … of depreciation for that year would be only equal to the business profits. A reading of Sections 32(2), 72(2) and 72(3) of the Act would go to show that if the profits of the business are inadequate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Morarjee Goculdas Spg. and Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jan-28-2005
Direct Taxation
day of July, 1995." (231 ITR (St.) 228, 256).78. After insertion of Explanation to Section 158BA(2) by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 with retrospective effect from July 1, 1995, there is no dispute now that the block assessment under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector of Income-tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Personality Enhanceme ...
Delhi
Oct-07-2015
Direct Taxation
but under Section 10(22) of the Act. Section 10(22) of the Act was omitted by virtue of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 and the exemption available to a university or an educational institution existing solely for educational purposes was included … gains" and claims that the loss or any part thereof should be carried forward under sub-section (1) of section 72, or sub-section (2) of section 73, or sub-section (1) [or sub-section (3)] of section 74, [or sub- section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.R. Thangavelu Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax-III
Chennai
Sep-12-2016
Land Acquisition
and 4894 of 1999 dated 23.02.2001. 3. The petitioner filed declaration under section 89 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 in respect of the KVSS, in Form-1A as per Rule 3(1)(a) of the KVSS Rules 1998, before the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »