Advanced Search Results
Krishna Textiles Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax
Gujarat
Jul-18-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37, 37(1), 69, 69A, 69B and 69C; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8 and 106
(2008)220CTR(Guj)568; [2009]310ITR227(Guj)
of the Income Tax Act, 1961. He has further submitted that the proviso to Section 69-C inserted by Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 with effect from 01.04.1999 has no application to the facts of the present case as the assessment year
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCargo Clearing Agency (Gujarat) Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Gujarat
Aug-08-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(7A), 3, 4, 4(1), 32(2), 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 113, 132, 132A, 132B, 132(5), 132(7), 139, 139(1), 139(5), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1A), 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 145, 147 to 153, 153(2), 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BB(2), 158BC, 158BD, 158BE, 158BG, 158BH and 245D; Finance Act, 1995; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Finance Act, 2001; Finance Act, 2002
(2008)218CTR(Guj)541; [2008]307ITR1(Guj)
in case of all assessees.(iii) The amendment will take effect retrospectively from 1st July, 1995.12.2. Again by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 certain further amendments were made in Chapter XIV-B of the Act and the same have been explained by … the undisclosed income for the block period, the provisions of Sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69C shall, mutatis mutandis apply and the term 'financial … Association of Persons (AOP) declaring income of Rs. 5,05,087/- came to be filed.3. On 24.11.1995 search proceedings Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) were carried out at the residential premises of three
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Goyal Vs. Asstt Cit
Delhi
Sep-12-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)87TTJ(Del)151
XIV-B of the Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) has also placed reliance on Explanationn B & C inserted by Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, by which it was clarified as under:'Explanation -B. The total undisclosed income relating to block period shall not … the remaining amount of Rs. 23.75 lakhs is out of undisclosed sources and treated as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The addition of Rs. 23,75,000 consists of the following :(a) Rs. 8.50
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Col. G.K. Burli Vs. Bangalore Development Authority
Karnataka
Jul-30-1985
CivilConstitution
Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 14
ILR1986KAR1628; 1985(2)KarLJ510
sites and fulfil the norms laid down for allotment of such sites and consider ail such applications together. Section 69 of the Act, empowers the State Government to make Rules to carry out the purposes of the Act. … the State Government regarding disposal of civic amenity sites in conformity with the provisions of the Act. - FINANCE(NO.2)ACT,1998 -- Sections 92 & 90: [Deepak Verma & Anand Byrareddy, JJ] Declaration under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Held,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-17-2005
ConstitutionService Tax
Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994
AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200
by goods transport operators were omitted with effect from 16th October, 1998. By the Finance Act (No. 2), 1998, Section 69 was also amended. The various sub-sections including Sub-sections (2) and (5) were omitted. The body of the sections
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Nalanda Housing Development Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot
Jul-15-2005
Direct Taxation
(2005)98TTJ(Rajkot.)518
Development (P) Ltd. (supra). Furthermore, the proviso to Section 69C had been inserted in the statute book by Finance (No. 2) Act 1998 w.e.f. 1st April, 1999. Thus the effect of this proviso will alter the position only w.e.f. asst. yr. … of Revenue relates to CIT(A)'s direction in deleting the addition of Rs. 50,71,505 made as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the IT Act.4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a private limited
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDas'S Friends Builders (P) Ltd . Vs. Dy. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra
Mar-27-2002
Direct Taxation
(2004)88TTJAgra651
cases. This section prescribes the method of valuation of stock-in-trade. But this section came on the statute by Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with effect from 1-4-1999. This is substantive provision of law which was brought on the statute with a … by the revenue relate to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 81,69,717 made by assessing officer under section 69 of the Act on account of unexplained investment in the property constructed for sale.Briefly, the facts of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDy. Cit(A) Vs. Subham Industries
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
Jun-29-2006
Direct Taxation
case, in view of the newly inserted provisions of Section 142A with retrospective effect from 15.11.1972 by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, the order dated 9^thNovember, 2004, passed in I.T.A. Nos. 1399 & 1400/Alld/1998 should not be recalled as … assessment or reassessment under this Act, where an estimate of the value of any investment referred to in Section 69 or Section 69B or the value of any bullion, jewellery or other valuable article referred to in Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Vs. Shubham Industies
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
Jun-29-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)104ITD126Luck
Officer under Section 142A of the Act. The Section 142A of the Act, which has been inserted by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 reads as under: 142A. (1) For the purposes of making an assessment or reassessment under this Act, … in ITAT's order dated 9-11-2004, passed in ITA Nos. 1399 and 1400/Alld 1998 for the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97.2. The Department has stated in … assessment or reassessment under this Act, where an estimate of the value of any investment referred to in Section 69 or Section 69B or the value of any bullion, jewellery or other valuable article referred to in Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shubham Industries
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
Jul-27-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)106TTJLuck34
AO under Section 142A of the Act. The Section 142A of the Act, which has been inserted by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, reads as under: 142A. Estimate by Valuation Officer in certain cases.(1) For the purposes of making an … assessment or reassessment under this Act, where an estimate of the value of any investment referred to in Section 69 or Section 69B or the value of any bullion, jewellery or other valuable article referred to in Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »