Advanced Search Results
Secy. Federn. of Bus-operators Assn. of T.N. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Apr-30-2001
Service TaxMotor Vehicles
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 35(38), 65, 65(38), 65(48), 65(50), 65(51), 65(52), 66, 66(3) and 67; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(22), 2(25), 2(40), 2(43), 49, 51, 58(1), 58(2), 65, 65(32), 65(38), 65(44), 65(48), 65(50) to 65(52), 65(62), 67, 68, 70, 71, 72, 72(2), 72(9), 73, 74, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87(1), 88(8), 88(9), 88(11), 88(14) and 89; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 63(1), 63(6) and 68; Central Excise Act, 1944; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1996; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1997; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1998; The Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 82 to 85 and 128; Motor Vehicles Permit for All India Tours Rules, 1993; Fina
2001(134)ELT618(Mad); 2006[2]STR411; [2007]6STT49
and 'Pager Services'. Further widening was effected by including 12 additional services in Finance Act, 1997. Ultimately, in Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, 12 more 'services' were defined under Section 65(48) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1994 under the head … above, all the above writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. Connected W.M.P. Nos. 28726 of 1997; 155, 264, 5292, 5293 of 16630 to 16633 of 1988; 9413,13773,13918,14527,15229,15236,15436, 16067,16603,16605,16912, 17372 to 17378,18715,18716,19782,19817,19987, 19988, 20701, 21247, 21788, 24355, 24540,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVidesh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Aug-17-2007
Direct Taxation
(2008)111ITD190(Mum.)
no way qualify, restrict the amplitude of the words "telecommunication services".39. The learned Counsel further relied on the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 which has inserted the following in Section 80-IA(4C) w.e.f. 1st April, 1995 after the words telecommunication services, whether
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod Khatri Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jan-14-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)82TTJ(Delhi)911
AO is a negative figure," 6. With effect from 1st Oct., 1998, Section 253(6) was amended by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 enhancing the Court fee for filing appeals before the Tribunal. This amended provision which came into force w.e.f. … dt. 31st Aug., 1992 [(1992) 198 ITR 1 (St)] issued by the CBDT explaining the amended provisions observed: 52. "Filing fee for appeals before Tribunal--The Finance Act has amended Section 253 enhancing the fee to be paid
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati Vs. C.B.i., New Delhi
Supreme Court of India
May-02-2003
CustomsCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 245 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 166 to 177 and 378 to 462; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 111, 112A and 130E; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Sections 90(2), 90(4) and 91; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Gift Tax Act, 1958; Income Tax Act, 1961; Interest Tax Act, 1974; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; Central Excise Act, 1944; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
AIR2003SC2545; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)292; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)142; 2003(51)BLJR1697; 2003CriLJ3041; 2003(3)CTC356; (2003)182CTR(SC)1; 104(2003)DLT699(SC); 2003(87)ECC473; 2003(155)ELT4; (2003) 5 SCC 257
Our attention was also drawn to the Text of the Kar Vivad SamadhanScheme, 1998, under Chapter IV of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998. Our attention wasalso drawn to Sections 86 to 98 of the said Scheme which are relevant for thepresent … passed by theHigh Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Miscellaneous (M) Nos. 360/2002 and447/2002 filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code read with Article227 of the Constitution of India by the appellants herein
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGilbs Computer Limited (Formerly Gold Fish Computers P. Ltd.) Under Co ...
Mumbai
Jul-29-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(45), 5, 33, 143(3), 249, 253, 253(A), 253(6), 256(2) and 260A; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970; Finance Act, 1981; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Finance Act, 1999; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959
(2009)226CTR(Bom)19; [2009]317ITR159(Bom); [2009]184TAXMAN342(Bom)
cases would include cases where the total income computed by the Assessing Officer is a negative figure.11. The Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 once again amended Section 253(6) and it was provided that if the total income was less than Rs.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLancer Army School Society Vs. Asstt. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Jul-19-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)90TTJ(Ahd.)1024
of any such deduction of unexplained expenditure, we may point out that proviso has been introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, and takes effect prospectively with effect from 1-4-1999. The proviso would, therefore, not be applicable in the instant … Singh on 29-6-1999. Smt. Pammy Manjit Singh is trustee of the assessee-trust and is also principal of primary section of the school. Her husband, Dr. Manjit Singh, is administrator and principal of secondary and higher secondary sections … in confirming the action of assessing officer in making addition of Rs. 52,778 of income reflected in income and expenditure account of various years as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMid East Port Folio Management Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Aug-14-2003
Land Acquisition
(2003)87ITD537(Mum.)
of sale and lease back. He invited our attention to Expln. 4A to Section 43(1) introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996, w.e.f. 1st Oct., 1996. Our attention was also drawn to the Memorandum explaining the amendment which is … of the sale and lease back arrangement. After a few reminders, RSEB filed a letter dt. 17th Feb., 1998, clarifying the following : 1. The booking of the capitalised cost of plant, machinery and equipment is in … 264 affirmed in CIT v. Peacock Chemicals (P) Ltd. (1999) 102 Taxman 527 (Del) This order is based on the special facts of the case
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDavi SarIn Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra
Jun-10-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)84ITD391Agra
rest the controversy as to whether block assessment subsumes the regular assessment or is independent of the latter, Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, has inserted the clarificatory Explanations with retrospective effect from 1st July, 1995, after Sub-section (2) of Section 158BA … w.e.f 1st April, 1995 to 14th Nov., 1995 (the date on which search under Section 132 concluded) Rs. 52,60,900. The above return filed for undisclosed income of Rs. 52,60,900 was subsequently revised on 27th Sept., 1996, wherein,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Manoj Aggarwal, Bemco Vs. Dcit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jul-25-2008
Direct Taxation
Mr. Jain's objection, having regard to the language of Section 158BB(1), as amended retrospectively from 1.7.1995 by the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.78. We may now turn to the enquires conducted by the Assessing Officer at Amritsar in … he has admitted to have given accommodation entries. c) In the statement given by him on 14-12-2000 (pages 52,53 & 56 of the paper book), he has stated that all other accounts except Bemco and Bishan Chand
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.S. Chandrashekar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
May-26-1999
Direct Taxation
to the retrospective amendment brought to s. 158BE relating to time-limit for completion of block assessment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 1995. Actually, a new Explanation was introduced to the aforesaid section in … order of the Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench (Third Member) in the case of ITO vs. P. M. Suthar (1995) 52 TTJ (Ahd) 260 (TM) : (1995) 53 ITD 1 (Ahd) (TM). Lastly, the learned Departmental Representative also brings
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »