Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. K.S. Venkataraman and Co.
Chennai
Aug-05-1998
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1977 - Sections 2(7); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A
[2000]243ITR377(Mad)
the purpose of deriving the benefit of the lower rate of taxation accorded to industrial companies under the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1977. It also claims investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the ground that … of 1988 (CIT v. K. S. Venkataraman and Co. Pvt. Ltd. : [2000]243ITR314(Mad) , decided on August 3, 1998 remanded the matter to the assessing authority to consider that question afresh as to whether the assessee meets
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEscapade Resorts (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Aug-25-2006
Direct Taxation
(2008)303ITR118(Coch.)
being a company, mentioned in this section.9. Now, Section 115JA was brought on the statute book by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996, which was applicable from the asst. yr. 1997-98. The scope and effect of this section was explained … the subsequent year or years under the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 32 or Sub-section (3) of Section 32A or Clause (ii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 72 or Section 73 or Section 74 or Sub-section (3) … are preferred by the assessee which relate to the asst. yrs. 1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2001-02 and one appeal is preferred by the Revenue relating
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSimbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit, Range-1
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
May-11-2007
Direct Taxation
or Section 37 cannot be claimed which stands clarified by the insertion of the proviso therein under the Finance Act, 2003. As such, the assessee cannot claim any benefit of Section 36(1)(iii) or Section 37 in this … of the assessee for both the assessment years under consideration is allowed.8. Now we shall deal with Ground No. 2 of the appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2000-01 pertaining to the issue of the assessee's claim … an incentive for the purpose of setting up a specified industry (sections 32A and 33). The term "actual cost" is applicable only in relation to … fact that the predecessor Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in the assessment year 1998-99, being the initial assessment year, has held the said project to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. N. Venkataraman
Chennai
Feb-17-2000
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A
[2000]245ITR73(Mad)
our attention the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Shaan Finance (P.) Ltd. : [1998]231ITR308(SC) . Learned senior counsel also relied upon the … counsel also relied upon the decision of the Karnataka High Court in Hind Nippon Rural Industries Pvt. Ltd, (No. 2) v. CIT : [1993]201ITR588(KAR) and submitted that chipping and sizing of granite do not amount to manufacture or … Department is whether the assessee is entitled to claim investment allowance in respect of the air compressor under Section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'), used by it for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Indian Warehousing Industries Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-04-2004
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40(3)
(2004)188CTR(Mad)283; [2004]269ITR203(Mad)
of the value of the warehouses as they were exempt under the provisions of Section 40(3) of the Finance Act, 1983?2. In order to appreciate the question of law, it is necessary to notice the facts in … Ltd & Am : [1998]231ITR308(SC) In the said decision, the question was whether investment allowance was allowable under Section 32A of the IT Act in respect of the machinery owned by the assessee, but leased to third parties
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Gotan Lime Stone Khanij Udyog and A.R. ...
Rajasthan
Sep-06-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)211CTR(Raj)585; [2008]299ITR368(Raj)
Co. Ltd. : [2006]281ITR297(Guj) ; (8) CIT v. Bajrang Enterprises : [2002]258ITR448(Mad) ; (9) CIT v. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. : [2002]254ITR558(Mad) ; (10) CIT v. C.S. Anand : [1997]225ITR573(Patna) ; (11) CIT v. Sibson Construction … Deo Narayan Thanvi, J.1. As common questions of law with regard to the entitlement of investment allowance under Section 32A of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') are involved in these three appeals, therefore, … little bit different as referred hereunder:(i) D.B. IT Appeal No. 41 of 2002:2. In this appeal, the assessee was carrying on business of excavation of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Daljeet Tyres
Allahabad
Sep-22-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A, 32A(2), 33, 80I, 143(3) and 260A; Finance Act, 1976; Finance Act, 1972
(2006)201CTR(All)530; [2006]287ITR344(All)
of the Act on the cost of computer.13. The apex Court in the case of CIT v. Shaan Finance (P) Ltd. : [1998]231ITR308(SC) , had an occasion to consider the meaning, import and scope of Section 32A. … was justified in upholding the findings of CIT(A) directing allowance of the assessee's claim for investment allowance under Section 32A of the IT Act, 1961 at, Rs. 3,79,285 on new machineries installed in the branch set for doing … 1. This appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act has been filed by the Revenue on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFirst Leasing Company of India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (No ...
Chennai
Jul-02-1998
Direct Taxation
[2000]244ITR234(Mad)
answer to those questions has been settled by the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Shaan Finance (P.) Ltd. : [1998]231ITR308(SC) . The Supreme Court in that case which also concerns this assessee, held that … the Income Tax Act,1961 ?'4. We may conveniently dispose of questions Nos. 2 to 5 as the answer to those questions has been settled by … Whether the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to investment allowance under section 32A on the machinery leased out to other company ?3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSrei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income ...
Delhi
Feb-13-2015
Direct Taxation
the subsequent year or years under the provisions of subsection (2) of section 32 or sub-section (3) of section 32A or clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 72 or section 73 or section 74 or subsection (3) … TAX APPEAL No.371/2012 Reserved on : Date of decision :11. h December, 2014 13th February, 2015 SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. U.A. Rana, Ms. Mrinal Elker Mazumdar, Mr. … KHANNA, J.: These two appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) by the assessee SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd. pertaining
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGowri Shankar Finance Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Karnataka
Nov-27-2000
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32, 32A, 43, 142(1), 143(1), 143(2) and 256(1)
(2001)166CTR(Kar)137; [2001]248ITR713(KAR); [2001]248ITR713(Karn); [2001]116TAXMAN375(Kar)
is the customers themselves who chose the consumer durables and also arranged for their purchase. The assessee provided finance for purchasing the goods. In the books of the assessee, the customers become indebted tothe entire cost of … and on these facts it was held that the assessee would be entitled to the investment allowance under Section 32A. Whereas in the case before us the finding recorded is that the assessee neither actually owned the assets … 'the Tribunal'), has referred the following three questions of law under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), at the instance
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »