Advanced Search Results

Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati Vs. C.B.i., New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 245 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 166 to 177 and 378 to 462; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 111, 112A and 130E; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Sections 90(2), 90(4) and 91; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Gift Tax Act, 1958; Income Tax Act, 1961; Interest Tax Act, 1974; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; Central Excise Act, 1944; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Reported in : AIR2003SC2545; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)292; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)142; 2003(51)BLJR1697; 2003CriLJ3041; 2003(3)CTC356; (2003)182CTR(SC)1; 104(2003)DLT699(SC); 2003(87)ECC473; 2003(155)ELT4; (2003) 5 SCC 257

Our attention was also drawn to the Text of the Kar Vivad SamadhanScheme, 1998, under Chapter IV of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998. Our attention wasalso drawn to Sections 86 to 98 of the said Scheme which are relevant for thepresent … process against the appellantand therefore, the same, in our view, is liable to be quashed and set aside.35. Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962 which provides for confiscation ofimproperly imported goods, etc. insofar as it is relevant

Eyelite Optical Industries Vs. Commissioner of Cus.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1963 - Sections 87, 87(J) 88, 89, 95, 111, 112 and 124; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Sections 86 and 95; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Act, 1944; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2000(71)ECC499; 2000(121)ELT593(Kar)

filling the write petition the matter was pending at that stage.7. In the meantime Section 86 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 introduced the scheme called 'Ka-- Vivad Samadhan Scheme'. The Scheme is an offer by the Government for settling … the Additional Commissioner (Customs) passed an order dated 14-3-1997 bearing No. 29/97 confiscating the said goods under Section 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1963 (for short 'the Act'). He levied a redemption fine of Rs.

Senior Depot Manager, Indian Oil Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)(224)ELT335Tri(Bang.)

Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), (ii) the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 111 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 (21 of 1998), and (iii) the special additional excise duty leviable under Section 147 of the Finance Act,

Jones (Respondent) Vs. Ministry of Interior Al-mamlaka Al-arabiya as S ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Land Acquisition

D 605, 618-619; Zoernsch v Waldock [1964] 1 WLR 675, 692; Propend Finance Pty Ltd v Sing (1997) 111 ILR 611, 669; R v Bow … any relevant respect ambiguous or obscure: it is, as Ward LJ observed in Al-Adsani v Government of Kuwait (No 2) (1996) 107 ILR 536, 549, "as plain as plain can be". In the ordinary way, the duty of … is accordingly asked by the claimants to interpret the 1978 Act under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 in a manner which would require or permit immunity to be refused to the Kingdom and the individual

Hassan Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

the effect that the conciliation proceedings are terminated, on the date of the declaration. The Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 Section 2 relates to Definitions: Sub-section (f) defines licensee which reads as under:-"licensee means a person licensed under Part … by the Commission involves a very highly technical requiring working knowledge of finance, commerce, economics and management. It would be more appropriate and effective if … Chaudhari for the petitioner contended as follows: (i) that even though petitioner has a remedy of Appeal under Section 111 of Act, 2003 against the order of the KERC dated 17.12.2018, petitioner has not chosen to invoke alternative

Binny Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cwt, Central Circle Ii(4)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96ITD500(Chennai)

by the Finance Act, 1994, with effect from 1-4-1995 and it was further extended to 10 years by Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with effect from 1-4-1999; which means that for the assessment year 1993-94, the limit was only three years … industrial company and the company made a reference to Board of Industrial Financial Reconstruction (in short BIFR) under section 15 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act in May, 1993. It seems that properties were pledged

Omkar S. Kanwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2000)4GLR2903

1998 issued by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 97(1) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 promulgating Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as 'KVS Scheme' and as the 'Order of 1998'

icici Venture Funds Management Vs. Sofil Information Systems

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)6CompLJ134

should be taken to substantiate the case of fraud as held by the Madras High Court in Malleswara Finance and Investments Company Private Limited v.Company Law Board (1995) Vol.82 CC 836, more so, when the contesting parties … shares of Rs. 10/- each by substituting the names of the respondents 2 to 6 in the place of the seventh respondent, on the sole … 1. This company petition is filed under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") seeking directions against M/s SOFIL Information Systems Private Limited ("the Company")

Bhagwati Developers Private Limited Vs. Peerless General Finance and I ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F and 111; ;Security Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 13 and 16

Reported in : (2003)3CALLT593(HC),[2005]128CompCas444(Cal),[2004]51SCL204(Cal)

eighty three thousand) only for purchasing 3530 (three thousand five hundred thirty) equity shares in the Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Peerless').6. On July 25, 1986 Bhagwati advanced Rs. 38,83,000/- (Rupees … Mukherjee, J.1. This is an appeal against judgment and order dated November 25, 1998 passed by the Company Law Board, Eastern Region Bench at Calcutta … registration. As Peerless did not register those shares in the name of Bhagwati, Bhagwati filed an application under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 before the Company Law Board, Eastern Region Bench.19. By the order impugned dated

Estate Investment Company Vs. Siltap Chemicals Limited

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1999)96CompCas217

despite various judgments by the Company Law Board and directives of the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, to the effect that the company has to return them to the party who lodged them in the … Bombay High Court in Suit No. 1668 of 1998 in respect of the said shares therein seeking … the Company Law Board held that if complicated questions of law or facts arise in a petition under Section 111 which cannot be adjudicated on the basis of documents made available, but could be decided only on trial … petitioners and rectify the register of members accordingly and return the balance 200 shares and 500 shares respectively to the petitioners along with the transfer … and would rest content by saying that it denies that it has acted in a mala fide manner or it is trying to help the