Advanced Search Results
Union of India Vs. M/S Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats pv ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-07-2018
Service Tax
unconstitutional as well as ultra vires the provisions of Sections 66 and 67 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). The High Court of Delhi has, by the judgment dated November … (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). The High Court of Delhi has, by the judgment dated November 30, 2012, accepted the said challenge and declared Rule 5 to be ultra vires these provisions. Other cases have met … to be provided by a consulting engineer to (1970) 77 ITR1071 2 Central Bank of India & Ors. v. Workmen, etc., (1960) 1 SCR200 Babaji … the Rules as unconstitutional as well as ultra vires the provisions of Sections 66 and 67 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrijgopalmaheshwari, S/O. Marikishan, Vs. the Districtconsumer Dispute ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-09-2014
Land Acquisition
appellant proposing to levy service tax under different heads and interest provided for under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short, 'the Finance Act') and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of that Act. After hearing … the CustoMs.Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, (for short, 'the Tribunal').It has also filed Application No.46 of 2012, with a prayer to waive the pre-deposit. Through its order dated 10.07.2013, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit … THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.48 OF201309-01-2014 M/S.Patel Engineering Limited,12th Square Building, 3rd Floor,Road No.12,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Patelengineering Limited,12th Squa Vs. the Commissionerof Central ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-09-2014
Land Acquisition
appellant proposing to levy service tax under different heads and interest provided for under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short, 'the Finance Act') and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of that Act. After hearing … the CustoMs.Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, (for short, 'the Tribunal').It has also filed Application No.46 of 2012, with a prayer to waive the pre-deposit. Through its order dated 10.07.2013, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit … THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.48 OF201309-01-2014 M/S.Patel Engineering Limited,12th Square Building, 3rd Floor,Road No.12,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
National Building Construction Company Limited vs.union of India & ...
Delhi
Nov-16-2018
Land Acquisition
of Section 66B of the Fin Act. Section 66B creates a charge of service tax on or after Finance Act, 2012. WP(C) 1144/2016 Page 11 of 55 16. Section 83 of the Fin Act reads as under:-"Application of certain … in part, the same shall be recovered along with interest thereon in any of the modes specified in section 87, without service of notice under sub-section (1). (2) The Central Excise Officer shall, after considering the representation, if
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSirajudeen Siyad vs Assistant Commissioner
Kerala
May-24-2024
has filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P1 revenue recovery notice dated 01.06.2023 issued under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Ext.P2 Order-in-Original dated 28.09.2017 passed by the respondent to remit service tax from the year 2011-2012.2. … 003. BY ADVS. RUBY K. ROY AISWARYA E J VETTIKOMPIL ABESH ALOSIOUS SEN C PUTHUPPARAMPIL RESPONDENT: ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CENTRAL TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDigipro Import & Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Delhi
May-15-2017
Land Acquisition
context of the proceedings under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 („DVAT Act‟) as well as the Finance Act, 1994. The Court has in a detailed judgment in Capri Bathaid Private Limited v. Commissioner of Trade & … availing of exemption by the... Petitioner under Notification No.12/2012-CE dated 17th March, 2012. The note on the file further states that while scrutinising the... Petitioner's … Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2,3, 4 and 5. SI Adarsh Shrivastava, Superintendent, Central Excise. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER1505.2017 % Dr. S. … Capri Bathaid Private Limited v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes 2016 (155) DRJ526held that “by no means does Section 87 (6) of the DVAT Act enable the officers who undertake a search and seizure operation under Section 60
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-02-2021
Direct Taxation
he submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also not … royalty contained in explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi). Further, he referred to Circular No.10/2002 dated 09.10.2002 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“CBDT”]. in which “remittance for royalties” and “remittance for supply of articles or…computer software” … IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8733-8734 OF2018ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED …APPELLANT Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. B.K. Naik and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Ministry of Lay and P ...
Karnataka Dharwad
Jul-10-2015
Education
Singh and others. (xiii) (2009)8 SCC 431 A.Manjula Bhashini and others vs. Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Women's Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited and another 13. Having heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties, on perusal of the … AIR 1996 SC 188 S.R.Bhagwat and Others vs. State Of Mysore ii) 2012 (3) Kar.L.J. 77 (DB) State of Karnataka vs. I. Rudrayya and others … Act being in concurrent list, impugned Act in question over rides the Central Act and same is beyond legislature competence of the State legislation. v) … working in Government colleges/institutions and it would amount to discrimination since both are discharging same duties; ii) When Section 87 of Karnataka Education Act, has fixed same parameters for both the employees namely employees working in educational institutions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India
Chennai
Jun-20-2014
Service Tax
by Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance New Delhi 2 The Commissioner Central Excise and Service Tax Gobichettipalayam 3 The Gobichettipalayam Municipality represented by its … of India, seeking a writ of declaration, declaring the provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as ultra vires and unconstitutional and unenforceable. For petitioner in W.P.No.16400/2013 Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For RR1& 2 in … Limited v. Union of India and another; ii 2011 (22) STR257(Ori.).Utkal Builders Limited versus Union of India; iii 2012 (25) STR231(M.P.).Entertainment World Developers Limited versus Union of India; iv [2011].45 VST523(Guj).Cinemax India Limited versus Union of India … from agriculture exclusively by the States in contrast with Entries 82, 86, 87 and 88 where the taxes are imposed on properties other than agricultural
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Stemcyte India Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. versus Commissioner of Centr ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025]8S.C.R.70
Services” during the disputed period and thus, whether exempted from the levy of service tax as per the 2012 and 2014 Notifications dtd.20.06.2012 and 17.02.2014 issued by the Ministry of Finance - Show cause notice was issued … disputed period and thus, whether eligible for exemption from payment of service tax during the said period. Headnotes† Finance Act, 1994 - Exemption notification - “Healthcare Services” - Exemption from payment of service tax - Entitlement to - … 2025 INSC 841 M/s Stemcyte India Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ahmedabad -III (Civil Appeal No(s). 3816-3817 of 2025) … to show cause why their refund claim should not be rejected under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant filed a written … 243; Padmini Products v. CCE [1989] 3 SCR 873 : (1989) 4 SCC 275; CCE v. Chemphar
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »