Advanced Search Results
M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … Cotton Ginning Pressing and Oil Industries, Kolhapur Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.” (Writ Petition no.33 of 2012), to contend that the provisions of the credit rules are required to be read harmoniously and such reading … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of … Mehra Brothers Vs. Joint Commercial Officer, Madras, (1991)1 Supreme Court Cases 514) 50. Banco Products (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Vadodara-I, (2009(235) ELT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFederation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and Others V ...
Delhi
Aug-12-2016
Service Tax
challenged on the ground that they are beyond the legislative competence of Parliament. 13. Thereafter, Parliament enacted the Finance Act, 2012 amending the FA by inserting Sections 65B (22), 65 B (44), 66B and 66E. The relevant provisions of … for the value of the service." The Finance Minister had announced a 50% rebate from the value of the service which again was to be … consideration (not including a grant or subvention payment made by one government agency or department, whether of the central government or of any state government, to another) and includes- (i) to (vi).... (vii) supply, by way of … 226 of the Constitution of India is to the constitutional validity of Section 65 (105) (zzzzv) of the Finance Act 1994 (FA) whereby the provision
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India & Others versus Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-11-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025]2S.C.R.756; (2025) 5 SCC 906
II being the taxation entry - Constitution of India - Finance Act, 2007 - Finance Act, 2010 - Finance Act, 2012 - Finance Act, 2015 - Finance Act, 2016 - Service Tax Rules, 1994 - r.7C - Lotteries (Regulation) … Officer, Rajahmundry [1968] 2 SCR 476 : AIR 1968 SC 784; Moped India Ltd. v. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Nellore [1985] Supp. 1 SCR 954 : (1986) 1 SCC 125; Alwaye Agencies v. Deputy Commissioner of … of the conventional paper lottery of the Government for a maximum of 50 (fifty) weekly lottery schemes per day, the sole purchaser shall pay a … category of taxable services, namely “Business Auxiliary Service,” under sub-section (19) of Section 65, effective from 01.07.2003. Pursuant to this amendment, the Service Tax Department
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd.
Delhi
Jul-20-2015
Service Tax
Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in an appeal under Sub-Section (2) and (2A) of Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with applicable provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944, can examine and go into the question … AD (Delhi) 733 (hereinafter referred to as LR Sharma-I) and Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1 Vs. Kundalia Industries, 2012 (279) E.L.T. 351 (Del). 1.1 Accordingly, a larger bench was constituted. The questions of law, referred to us … separate Division Benches of this court in Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. L.R. Sharma, 2014 (4) AD (Delhi) 733 (hereinafter referred to as LR Sharma-I)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-2016
Service Tax
Application No. ST/Stay/125/2012) before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on several grounds. 16. Meanwhile, Finance Act, 2012 was enacted and, thereby, sections 97 and 98 have been inserted. Section 97 provide for retrospective exemption to … writ petition, we had granted Rule on 22nd February, 2016 and directed that it be heard along with Central Excise Appeal No. 21 of 2015. 2. Rule on interim relief in the writ petition was made returnable … on the face of the record. Hence, the writ petition be dismissed. 50. Mr. Jetly has relied upon the following judgments. (i) M. C. Mehta
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager
Supreme Court of India
Nov-13-2019
Land Acquisition
CJI1 Leave granted. BRIEF BACKGROUND:2. In the present batch of cases, the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and of the rules framed in consonance has been assailed. While it would be repetitious to reproduce … formulation of core issues arising for adjudication.3. The Madras Bar Association has preferred Writ Petition (Civil) No.267 of 2012 seeking the following reliefs:1. “i. A writ of mandamus, directing the Union of India, to implement the directions … From the compilation of the learned Attorney General, it appears that the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, the Armed Forces Tribunal, the … technical members shall not exceed the judicial members.” 50. Later, in Madras Bar Association vs. Union of … petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs T a Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Sanjeev Kumar Jha Vs. The Un ...
Jharkhand
Apr-07-2015
Land Acquisition
of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … Chandrapura, District Bokaro ............ Petitioner Vs. 1. The Union of India through Central Excise & Service Tax Department, Central Revenue Building, I.P. Estate, ITO, P.O. … Agency. Counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Gujrat High Court reported in 2012(286)E.L.T. 676 (Guj.) Adani Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Union of India. On the basis of these decisions it is submitted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilip Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Union of India Through Central Excise and Serv ...
Jharkhand
Jul-15-2015
Land Acquisition
of Appeal Nos. 107 to 114/ RAN/ 2014 as delay was not condonable under section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. It has further been submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India that it has … Jaiswal … … … … Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Central Excise and Service Tax Department, Central Revenue Building, New Delhi.2. The Commissioner … Agency. Counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Gujrat High Court reported in 2012(286)E.L.T. 676 (Guj.) Adani Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Union of India. On the basis of these decisions it is submitted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Rajkumar and Others Vs. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, New ...
Chennai
Apr-12-2016
Land Acquisition
provisions are not beneficial to him." 64. It may be noted that Sub-Section (2A) was inserted under the Finance Act, 2012 with effect from 1.4.2013, but was omitted by Finance Act, 2013, due to the controversies it created. However, … the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ii) the validity of a Notification bearing No.86/2013 dated 1.11.2013 issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 94-A(1), specifying Cyprus as a notified jurisdictional area for … it is necessary to deal with the said decision in greater detail. 50. The Government of India entered into an Agreement titled as Indo Mauritius
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Lakshminirman Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director ...
Karnataka
Jun-12-2015
Direct Taxation
227 of Constitution of India praying to declare the newly inserted Sec.234E of the IT Act, by the Finance Act, 2012 as unconstitutional being arbitrary, discriminatory and unreasonable, the relevant extract of Section 234E is enclosed as Annexure-A. These … Schedule 7. (i) Taxes having been deducted at source and having been remitted to the credit of the Central Government by the deductors within the stipulated time, no loss is caused to exchequer and as such the … PROPERTIES VS BUCKINGHAM COUNTY COUNCIL reported in (1960) 3 All England Report 503 to the following effect: But when a statute has some meaning even
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »