Advanced Search Results
Mumbai
Sep-15-2014
Service Tax
referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short âCESTATâ) dated … across the world, out of which in 10 countries the Appellants have set up the subsidiaries and in 37 countries the Appellants have set up branches. Also within India Appellants are running its operations from nearly 20
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … Cotton Ginning Pressing and Oil Industries, Kolhapur Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.” (Writ Petition no.33 of 2012), to contend that the provisions of the credit rules are required to be read harmoniously and such reading … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of … Steel Tubes (P) Ltd) versus Collector of C. Ex., ((1995) 2 SCC 372) (III) Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd and Anr Versus Comm. Of C.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Ferro Scrap Nigam Limited Vs. Cce, Raipur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Jan-01-2014
Service Tax
Watches Ltd. vs. CCE, Vadodara 2011 (21) STR 34 (Tri. Ahmd.) and Rathore Engg. Works vs. CCE, Chandigarh- 2012 (27) STR 37 (Tri.- Del.). He also draws our attention to the Board Circular dated 15.07.2007 and another … of Rs.2,38,97,913/- stands confirmed against the appellant alongwith imposition of penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, for the period 10.09.2004 to 28.02.2005, by way of raising a show cause notice dated 22.06.2006. 2. As … manufacture within the meaning of clause (f) of section 2 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 5. As such, as seen from the above reproduced
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner, Central Excise, Ser ...
Delhi
May-08-2019
Service Tax
character of the Master Circular can be traced to Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 which makes Section 37 B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applicable in relation to service tax. In terms Section 37 B … Petitioner were recorded under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. In response to the queries raised by the... RESPONDENTS, the... Petitioner furnished details by a letter dated … impugned SCN, the alleged non-payment of service tax pertains to period between 2012-2013 to 2016- 2017. Consequently, there is no „preventive‟ aspect involved in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Federation of Independent Business Vs. Sebelius
US Supreme Court
Jun-28-2012
Land Acquisition
Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-02-2021
Direct Taxation
he submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also not … royalty contained in explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi). Further, he referred to Circular No.10/2002 dated 09.10.2002 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“CBDT”]. in which “remittance for royalties” and “remittance for supply of articles or…computer software” … otherwise. Further, by explanation 4 to section 90 of the Income Tax 37 Act, it has been clarified by the Parliament that where any term
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCanara Bank vs the Union of India
Karnataka
Jun-01-2026
by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks … BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … Hitachi Home and Life Solutions Limited vs. State - 2018 (8) GSTL 370 (J & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCanara Bank vs the Union of India
Karnataka
Jun-01-2026
by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks … BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … Hitachi Home and Life Solutions Limited vs. State - 2018 (8) GSTL 370 (J & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBank of Baroda vs the Union of India
Karnataka
Jun-01-2026
by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks … BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … Hitachi Home and Life Solutions Limited vs. State - 2018 (8) GSTL 370 (J & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Karnataka Bank Ltd vs the Union of India
Karnataka
Jun-01-2026
by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks … BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … Hitachi Home and Life Solutions Limited vs. State - 2018 (8) GSTL 370 (J & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »