Advanced Search Results

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … operations from nearly 20 locations spread throughout the country. Total work force of the Appellants in India is 34,748. Total workforce engaged by the Appellants in their overseas branches is 8,360. Total work force engaged by subsidiaries

Chitra Construction Company Vs. Addl Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Valley, Green Home, Onampalayam, Coimbator”109. culminating in Mahazar dated 1.3.2012 as being ultra vires Section 82 of the Finance Act, apart from being in excess of jurisdiction and unconstitutional. W.P.No.22902 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 … .. Petitioner in W.P.No.22902 of 2012 vs.1. The Additional Commissioner of Customs Central Excise & Service Tax Head Quarters Preventive Unit 6/7, ATD Street Race … relevant bearing to the formation of the belief and are not irrelevant or extraneous to the purpose of Section 34 of the Income Tax Act, 1922.73. In Chhugamal Rajpatl Vs. S.P.Chaliha and others, 1971 AIR 730.the Supreme Court

Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and Others V ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

challenged on the ground that they are beyond the legislative competence of Parliament. 13. Thereafter, Parliament enacted the Finance Act, 2012 amending the FA by inserting Sections 65B (22), 65 B (44), 66B and 66E. The relevant provisions of … consideration (not including a grant or subvention payment made by one government agency or department, whether of the central government or of any state government, to another) and includes- (i) to (vi).... (vii) supply, by way of … 226 of the Constitution of India is to the constitutional validity of Section 65 (105) (zzzzv) of the Finance Act 1994 (FA) whereby the provision … those facts whether the sale of the food supplied is intended . 34. It is not in dispute that with a view to overcome the

C.c. C.e. And S.t. Bangalore (adjudication) Vs. M/s Northern Operating ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Service”, “Business Auxiliary Service”, “Commercial Training and Coaching Service”, “TTSS”, “Telecommunication and Legal Consultancy Service” etc., under the Finance Act, 1994 (hereafter “the Act”). Following an audit of the records by the revenue’s officials, proceedings were initiated against … Dated 23.04.2012; (for the period October 2006 - March 2011), 19.10.2012 (for the period April 2011 to March 2012), 07.05.2014 & 26.11.2015 (for the period April 2012 to September 2014). 4 Order-in-Original No.29/2013-14 dated 03.03.2014 and No.30/2013-14 … SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (hereafter variously described as “the revenue” or “the … revenue for the subsequent period. The CESTAT, by its common 1 Under Section 35L (b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2 Dated 23.12.2020 in … a separate hardship allowance of 20% of the 34 basic salary for working in India. The monthly

Commissioner of Salem Municipal Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Centra ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

: Rs.22,39,370.00 3. According to the petitioner, the respondent has wrongly interpreted Section 11(A)(1) of the Central Excise Act and Section 73(1) of the Finance … Service Tax was introduced on renting of immovable property service with effect from 01.6.2007 by the amendment of Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act, 2007. Further by the amendment in the year 2010, certain other immovable properties were … AT MADRAS DATED :05. 03.2013 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN Writ Petition No.32176 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 The Commissioner Salem Municipal Corporation Salem. .. Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of … The Commissioner Salem Municipal Corporation Salem. .. Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise O/o. Commissioner of Central Excise No.1, Foulks Compound Anai Road, Sale”001. … an appeal on 28.12.2012 with a delay of 34 days before the appellate authority and the same

All India Haj Umrah Tour Organizer Association Mumbai Vs. Union Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

was introduced with effect from 1st of July 2012 by incorporation of Sections 66B and 66C by the Finance Act, 2012. When this regime was introduced 26 with effect from 1st July 2012, more than 100 specific services were … amending Section 66-B, the percentage of service tax was enhanced to 14%. Section 66-C confers power on the Central Government to frame rules for determining the place where such services are provided or deemed to have been … agents, any service provided by way of grant of rights to use 34 immovable property or for carrying out or co- ordination of construction work;

M/S. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Rep. by Its Manager Vs. Mahaveer Chand D ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

the parties are left to bear their own costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2012 is closed. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34; Arbitration and … It gives various kinds of loans. One of it is Property Loan. It is also known as Home Finance. On 29.12.2005, Respondents 1 to 6 (petitioners 1 to 6 in O.P.No.678 of 2010) were sanctioned a property … opposed to public policy. In this connection, the learned counsel also cited CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Vs. RAVINDRA and OTHERS [AIR 2001 SCC 3095]. 19. … petition and passed the award accordingly. 10. In the circumstances, the borrowers have filed O.P.No.678 of 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the award reiterating the very same contentions that

Power Grid Corporation of India vs.ls Cable

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Indian law; it was urged that the Arbitral Tribunal failed to appreciate that under Section 68 the Finance Act, it is the service provider (LS Cables, the claimant in the impugned award) who is primarily liable to … many such projects in several countries. PGC is a Government company and Central Transmission Utility notified under Section 38 of the Electricity Act, 2003; it … challenged an award of 09.01.2010 made by the Arbitral Tribunal; the learned Single Judge rejected its petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”).2. The respondent (“LS Cables”) is a Korean incorporated corporation

Way2Wealth Brokers Pvt Ltd. Vs. C.B. Sharma

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

was justified in coming to the conclusion that the claim was within limitation. 9. In Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Miral Kanaksinh Thakore (2014 SCC OnLine Bom 22= (2014) 1 Bom CR 481)this Court (Coram:R. D. … 1996 before the Arbitral Tribunal seeking additional award. 3. On 9 January 2012 an Email addressed by the National Stock Exchange (NSE) to the Respondent … Chase Trading Co and anr 2002 (3) Bom. C.R. 201. 1716 (13) Central Warehousing Corporation v. A.S.A. Transport (2008) 3 Mh. L. J. 382 5. … 1996) against judgment dated 12 September 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge as the Arbitration Petition, under Section 34 of the Act of 1996, has been allowed and thereby directed the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal under the Bye-laws,

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Commissioner Service Tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

not be demanded and recovered under the proviso to the Section 73(1) read with Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and education cess under Section 95 of Finance Act … MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. This appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 has been preferred by Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), a … service tax. The claim petition was dismissed by the arbitrator which award was challenged by a petition under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act before a Single Judge of Bombay High Court. The Learned Judge held that