Advanced Search Results

Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and Others V ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

challenged on the ground that they are beyond the legislative competence of Parliament. 13. Thereafter, Parliament enacted the Finance Act, 2012 amending the FA by inserting Sections 65B (22), 65 B (44), 66B and 66E. The relevant provisions of … subvention payment made by one government agency or department, whether of the central government or of any state government, to another) and includes- (i) to … provisions, many state legislatures have enacted statutes bringing to tax sale of food and beverages. For e.g. the Section 2 (zc) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act 2004 defines 'sale' thus: "(zc) sale with its grammatical variations

Principal Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi €“II Vs ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Delhi under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CE Act) read with Section 83 of the Finance Act 1994, is directed against an order dated 18th November 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax … the above SCNs, an Order-in-Original was passed by the Adjudicating Authority, i.e. the Commissioner (Adjudication), on 6th November, 2012 confirming the above demand of service tax with interest. As regards the first SCN the said Order-in-Original levied … the Finance Act 1994, is directed against an order dated 18th November 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in

Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Circular No.148/17/2011-ST alone becomes otiose and in this context the impugned circular is liable to be quashed.46. The Finance Act, 2012 has completely revamped the service tax regime. Under the new service tax regime, as per Section 66D, all … Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs,

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Aids to interpretation (i) History of the legislation 107. The amendments (i.e. Finance Act 2008, Finance Act 2009, Finance Act 2012 and Finance Act 2015) do not throw light - by way of statement of objects and reasons or … 18 F. Deletion of certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on … which tend to promote international welfare in which India is interested, the Central Board of Revenue may, by general or special order, direct that it

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks

Bank of Baroda vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks

The Karnataka Bank Ltd vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks

M/s. Lakshminirman Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

227 of Constitution of India praying to declare the newly inserted Sec.234E of the IT Act, by the Finance Act, 2012 as unconstitutional being arbitrary, discriminatory and unreasonable, the relevant extract of Section 234E is enclosed as Annexure-A. These … Schedule 7. (i) Taxes having been deducted at source and having been remitted to the credit of the Central Government by the deductors within the stipulated time, no loss is caused to exchequer and as such the … (Prayers: This W.P. is filed under Article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to quash and to hold

Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Education

orders expired on 31/03/2011 and 31/03/2012. (ii) That Section 201(3) of the Act was amended on 28/05/2012 by Finance Act, 2012 with retrospective effect from 01/04/2010 whereby the limitation was substituted from four years to six years for passing … a Constitution Bench decision. It is submitted that, therefore, the decision in the case of Poolpandi Versus Superintendent, Central Excise, reported in 1992 (3) SCC 259 and decision in the case of CTO v. Bishwanath Jhunjhunwala, reported … are heard, decided and disposed of by this common judgement and order. 2. Special Civil Application No. 1623 of 2015 : By way of Special