Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … Cotton Ginning Pressing and Oil Industries, Kolhapur Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.” (Writ Petition no.33 of 2012), to contend that the provisions of the credit rules are required to be read harmoniously and such reading … G.S. Kulkarni, J. Both these appeals under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act 1944 arise out of the common orders dated 6.1.2012 of … for the period in dispute:-YearsTowerShelterOthersTotal2004-05174368801478938Chair - 298,738Printer - 1,224,53720,439,1002005-0644142943 441429432006-071591920315384719 313039222007-082658803428174029 54762063Total104087060450376861523282150648028 16. Mr. Sridharan, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the Appellant has made

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Application No. ST/Stay/125/2012) before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on several grounds. 16. Meanwhile, Finance Act, 2012 was enacted and, thereby, sections 97 and 98 have been inserted. Section 97 provide for retrospective exemption to … writ petition, we had granted Rule on 22nd February, 2016 and directed that it be heard along with Central Excise Appeal No. 21 of 2015. 2. Rule on interim relief in the writ petition was made returnable

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … of sub section (105) of Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994. The said services became taxable w.e.f. 16.05.2008. This is the output service of the Appellants and Appellants are duly registered with Service Tax Department accordingly.

M/s. Lakshminirman Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

227 of Constitution of India praying to declare the newly inserted Sec.234E of the IT Act, by the Finance Act, 2012 as unconstitutional being arbitrary, discriminatory and unreasonable, the relevant extract of Section 234E is enclosed as Annexure-A. These … Schedule 7. (i) Taxes having been deducted at source and having been remitted to the credit of the Central Government by the deductors within the stipulated time, no loss is caused to exchequer and as such the … a fee. The traditional concept of quid pro quo is undergoing transformation. 16. The Hon'ble Apex Court in JINDAL STAINLESS STEEL AND ANR VS STATE

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution and also liable to pay service tax under provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended from time to time as a provider of a taxable service namely broadcasting service within … 2009; Gujarat Entertainment Tax (Exhibition by means of Direct-to Home (DTH) Broadcasting Services) Rules, 2010; Jharkhand Entertainment Tax Act, 2012; Uttar Pradesh Entertainments and Betting Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2009; Uttarakhand (Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979) … or organization” - Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2(c) - Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2001 … Uttar Pradesh[1983] 3 SCR 812 : (1983) 4 SCC 202; Commissioner of CentralExcise and Customs, Kerala v. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. [2015] 8 SCR 1046 … Bihar [1964] 1 SCR 897: AIR 1963 SC 1667; Tata Sky Ltd. v. State of M.P. [2013]

M/S Neelanjana Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … (T-RES) -2- WRIT PETITION NO. 10103 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 16173 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 21347 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION

R. Shankar Reddy vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … (T-RES) -2- WRIT PETITION NO. 10103 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 16173 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 21347 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION

M/S Sri Balaji Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … (T-RES) -2- WRIT PETITION NO. 10103 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 16173 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 21347 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION

M/S Sri Manjunatheshwara Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … (T-RES) -2- WRIT PETITION NO. 10103 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 16173 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 21347 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION

M/S R P B Enerprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it … 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.4. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.5. THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL … (T-RES) -2- WRIT PETITION NO. 10103 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 16173 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 21347 OF 2023 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION