Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2012 central section 138 · Page 1 of about 131 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 2022

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

twin conditions. The second situation is said to be even more damaging given that the substitution by the Finance Act, 2018 is targeted only to this classification of Part-A of the Schedule, since the Court in the reported … legal deficiency as pointed out by FATF and to make it globally compliant, the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2012 amended Section 3 to include these activities. In support of his argument, learned Solicitor General draws our attention … certain provisions of the other statutes including the Customs Act, 19624, the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 20175, the Companies Act, 20136, the Prevention … and the laundering might be done 137 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 4546 138 Sou. Vijaya Alias Baby vs. State of Maharashtra, (2003) 8 SCC296(Para 6);

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2021

M/s Gimpex Private Limited Vs. Manoj Goel

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

business in India, impacted business sentiments and hindered investments from investors. Recognising these issues, the 26 Ministry of Finance by a notice dated 8 June 2020, has sought comments regarding decriminalisation of minor offences, including Section 138 … of 3 Criminal Procedure 1973 . 2 On 17 and 27 April 2012, the appellant entered into three High Seas Sale 4 5 Agreements with … Penal 6 Code 1860 , which was registered as an FIR in Central Crime Branch on 1 February 2013 as Crime No.21 of 2013. Between … Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras by which proceedings in a 1 2 complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 , pending on the file of the Seventh Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Cpio Cum Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Right to Information

was not liable to be disclosed. Section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted by the Finance Act, 1964 and simultaneously, Section 138 the Income Tax Act, 1961 was substituted. Section 138 of the Income Tax … VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions are filed inter alia impugning a common order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter ‘CIC’) directing the Public Information Officers, Commissioner of Incometax (hereafter ‘PIO’) to provide inspection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 24 2014

Aaa Portfolio Pvt Ltd and Anr. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Right to Information

was not liable to be disclosed. Section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted by the Finance Act, 1964 and simultaneously, Section 138 the Income Tax Act, 1961 was substituted. Section 138 of the Income Tax … VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions are filed inter alia impugning a common order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter ‘CIC’) directing the Public Information Officers, Commissioner of Incometax (hereafter ‘PIO’) to provide inspection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Rajan Nanda Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Right to Information

was not liable to be disclosed. Section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted by the Finance Act, 1964 and simultaneously, Section 138 the Income Tax Act, 1961 was substituted. Section 138 of the Income Tax … VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions are filed inter alia impugning a common order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter ‘CIC’) directing the Public Information Officers, Commissioner of Incometax (hereafter ‘PIO’) to provide inspection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Naresh Trehan Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Right to Information

was not liable to be disclosed. Section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted by the Finance Act, 1964 and simultaneously, Section 138 the Income Tax Act, 1961 was substituted. Section 138 of the Income Tax … VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions are filed inter alia impugning a common order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter ‘CIC’) directing the Public Information Officers, Commissioner of Incometax (hereafter ‘PIO’) to provide inspection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Escorts Ltd Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Right to Information

was not liable to be disclosed. Section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted by the Finance Act, 1964 and simultaneously, Section 138 the Income Tax Act, 1961 was substituted. Section 138 of the Income Tax … VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions are filed inter alia impugning a common order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter ‘CIC’) directing the Public Information Officers, Commissioner of Incometax (hereafter ‘PIO’) to provide inspection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Right to Information

was not liable to be disclosed. Section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted by the Finance Act, 1964 and simultaneously, Section 138 the Income Tax Act, 1961 was substituted. Section 138 of the Income Tax … VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions are filed inter alia impugning a common order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter ‘CIC’) directing the Public Information Officers, Commissioner of Incometax (hereafter ‘PIO’) to provide inspection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Cpio Cum Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Right to Information

was not liable to be disclosed. Section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted by the Finance Act, 1964 and simultaneously, Section 138 the Income Tax Act, 1961 was substituted. Section 138 of the Income Tax … VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions are filed inter alia impugning a common order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter ‘CIC’) directing the Public Information Officers, Commissioner of Incometax (hereafter ‘PIO’) to provide inspection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Aaa Portfolio Pvt Ltd and Anr. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Right to Information

was not liable to be disclosed. Section 137 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted by the Finance Act, 1964 and simultaneously, Section 138 the Income Tax Act, 1961 was substituted. Section 138 of the Income Tax … VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions are filed inter alia impugning a common order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter ‘CIC’) directing the Public Information Officers, Commissioner of Incometax (hereafter ‘PIO’) to provide inspection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial