Advanced Search Results
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi
Mar-14-2013
Direct Taxation
dated 31st August, 2012.47. In the affidavit filed on 30th November, 2012 the respondents have stated that by Finance Act 2012, Section 234E has been inserted whereby fee of Rs.200/- per day can be levied for default of the … KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Whether computerisation and Central Processing of Income Tax Returns is a boon or bane is rather … assessee to the deductor. The directions given above, are in accord with the provisions of the Act, namely, Section 133 and TDS provisions of the Act. If required and necessary, the income tax authorities can obtain prior approval
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2022
Land Acquisition
Aids to interpretation (i) History of the legislation 107. The amendments (i.e. Finance Act 2008, Finance Act 2009, Finance Act 2012 and Finance Act 2015) do not throw light - by way of statement of objects and reasons or … the taxable territories to charitable purposes which tend to promote international welfare in which India is interested, the Central Board of Revenue may, by general or special order, direct that it shall not be included in the … The judgment in Thanthi Trust .................................................................................................................. 18 F. Deletion of certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...
Karnataka
Jun-12-2015
Education
227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION234 IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-A. 6 W.P.NOs.6918-6938/2014: BETWEEN:1. … (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3, VAISHALI GHAZIABAD, UP- 201 010.2. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND TO HOLD THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION234 OF THE ACT AS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3476-3479/2014
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Anand Sonbhadra
Supreme Court of India
May-17-2022
Land Acquisition
mentioned above, we do not find that the lease deed in question can be said to be a finance lease.23. Keeping in view the Indian Accounting Standards, what appears broadly is that when lease involves real estate … incidents which, if the putative state of affairs had in fact 6 2012 (5) SCC66178 existed, must inevitably have flowed from or accompanied it. … … any law for the time being in force and payable to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority;18. Section 5(20) defines the … two cases. The 53 absence of classification amounts to non-compliance with mandatory requirement as to standards required under Section 133 of the Companies Act for which a penalty is provided. The lease in question does not countenance substantially
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirbhadra Singh & Anr. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Or ...
Delhi
Mar-31-2017
Land Acquisition
admitted to have made entries in the excel sheets on the instructions of Director, Corporate Affairs and ED, Finance of M/s IIL and other persons as recorded against the entries. However, the same had been denied by … petitioners submit that the CBI held a Preliminary Enquiry vide PE AC1 2012 A0007dated 19.10.2012 and closed it. The same is referred to as the … Mr. Mayank Jain, Mr. Madhur Jain & Ms. Manvi Priya Advocate Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG … VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT W.P.(CRL) 2757/2015 Page 1 of 133 VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioners have preferred the … A-0004 registered against them and two others under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter 'the PC Act') and Section 109 IPC by the respondent No.1/CBI, and all actions taken in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChitra Construction Company Vs. Addl Commissioner of Customs
Chennai
Jan-04-2013
Land Acquisition
Valley, Green Home, Onampalayam, Coimbator”109. culminating in Mahazar dated 1.3.2012 as being ultra vires Section 82 of the Finance Act, apart from being in excess of jurisdiction and unconstitutional. W.P.No.22902 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 … Amaravathi Street Bharathiar University Post Coimbator”046. .. Petitioner in W.P.No.22902 of 2012 vs.1. The Additional Commissioner of Customs Central Excise & Service Tax Head Quarters Preventive Unit 6/7, ATD Street Race Course Road Coimbator”018. 2. The Superintendent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India & Anr vs.sunny Abraham
Delhi
Aug-25-2017
Education
Sunny Abraham with the approval of the disciplinary authority. The disciplinary authority in the present case was the Finance Minister, who while granting approval had examined the detail note with full particulars of the imputations.5. Thereafter, charge … of the Tribunal which was disposed of vide order dated 30th April, 2012, with the direction to the authorities to make sincere efforts to dispose … Supreme Court had examined Rule 14 (2) and Rule 14(3) of the Central Civil Services WP(C)7649-2015 & 215-2016 Page 1 of 27 (Classification Control and … (8), being in collusion with Sh. K. K. Dhawan, DCIT had, with ulterior motive, conducted a survey under section 133 (A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at 5 proprietary group concerns of Shri Mukeshchandra Dahyabhai Gajiwala and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India & Anr. Vs.shri Pavan Ved & Anr
Delhi
Aug-25-2017
Education
Sunny Abraham with the approval of the disciplinary authority. The disciplinary authority in the present case was the Finance Minister, who while granting approval had examined the detail note with full particulars of the imputations.5. Thereafter, charge … of the Tribunal which was disposed of vide order dated 30th April, 2012, with the direction to the authorities to make sincere efforts to dispose … Supreme Court had examined Rule 14 (2) and Rule 14(3) of the Central Civil Services WP(C)7649-2015 & 215-2016 Page 1 of 27 (Classification Control and … (8), being in collusion with Sh. K. K. Dhawan, DCIT had, with ulterior motive, conducted a survey under section 133 (A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at 5 proprietary group concerns of Shri Mukeshchandra Dahyabhai Gajiwala and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPannalal Bhansali versus Bharti Telecom Limited & Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-10-2026
[2026] 3 S.C.R. 493
Co. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd.(1971) Comp. Cases 377 (Bom.) - referred to. British and American Trustee and Finance Corporation v. Couper(1894) SC 399; Kiri Industries Ltd. v. Senda International CapitalLtd. [2022] SGCA (I) 5; Baillie v. … Custodian, is available at Annexure A-9 & A-11, both in the year 2012, based on the purchase offers received. The purchase offers ranged between Rs.550/- … a further sanction by the Tribunal, wherein the Central Government and the Registrar of Companies is entitled … a certificate from the Company’s auditor that the accounting standards adopted is in conformity with that specified in Section 133, which is produced as Annexure A13 in the application under Section 66 before the NCLT produced as Annexure-A/14 … ConsiderationIssue arose whether the reduction of share capital u/s.66 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the consequent forced exit of minority shareholders, was arbitrary and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax- Ii Vs. M/S Maruti Suzuki (India) Limited
Delhi
Feb-21-2014
Direct Taxation
Rule 35A of the Appellate Tribunals Rules 1963 to grant stay of demand. Section 254(2A) was inserted by Finance Act, 1999 w.e.f. 1st June, 1999, at the time of insertion it was as under:"(2A) In every appeal, the … period of 6 months or till disposal of the appeal whichever was earlier by order dated 3rd February, 2012. The stay was extended vide order dated 28th August, 2012 for 5 months, which came to an end … the Supreme Court had examined paramateria provisions i.e. Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CE Act, for short), introduced w.e.f. 11th May, 2002 … APPEALS CIT ASSESSEE FILED BY ASSESSEE11281790 1121 578 464 239 273 182 133 120 18 13 14 19 21 (The data/figures in columns C and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »