Advanced Search Results
Bausch and Lomb Eyecare (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. The Addition ...
Delhi
Dec-23-2015
Land Acquisition
the Assessing Officer, having regard to retrospective amendment to Section 92CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act, 2012. (ii) Whether AMP Expenses incurred by the assessee in India can be treated and categorized as an international … Assessee also gets the global research report of the BandL Group free of cost. The issue 7. The central issue that arises in the present case is whether the advertising, marketing and promotion expenses ( ˜AMP') incurred … Communications India P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2015) 374 ITR 118 (Del). This Court heard a batch of appeals in the aforementioned decision
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2022
Land Acquisition
Aids to interpretation (i) History of the legislation 107. The amendments (i.e. Finance Act 2008, Finance Act 2009, Finance Act 2012 and Finance Act 2015) do not throw light - by way of statement of objects and reasons or … the taxable territories to charitable purposes which tend to promote international welfare in which India is interested, the Central Board of Revenue may, by general or special order, direct that it shall not be included in the … The judgment in Thanthi Trust .................................................................................................................. 18 F. Deletion of certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEnercon (India) Ltd. and Others Vs. Enercon Gmbh and Another
Mumbai
Oct-05-2012
Arbitration
buttress the said submission by referring to the clauses mentioned in the IPLA, regarding the grant of licences, finance, tenure of the IPLA; iv] That the patents in respect of which the licences were to be given … others; reported in AIR 1949 Nagpur 286 in the matter of The Central Bank, Yeotmal Ltd. V/s Vyankatesh Bapuji; and reported in (1976) 1 WLR … Karnataka High Court reported in AIR 1966 Mysore 118 in the matter of Coffee Board, Bangalore v/s. … came to be set aside, resulting in the Application filed under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 being allowed in terms of prayer clause 28(a) thereof, and the Injunction Application of the Petitioners above-named, … the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court reported in 2012(3) Bom. C.R. 36 in the matter of Olive Healthcare v/s. Lannett Company
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S. Kanjirappilly Amusement Park and Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of In ...
Kerala
Mar-22-2016
Service Tax
removal of admission and access to entertainment event and amusement facilities [sub-clause (j) of Section 66D of the Finance Act, 1994] from the Negative List of Services by an Amendment of 2012 and the consequent imposition of service … 3. I have heard both learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and both the learned Standing Counsel for Central Board of Excise and Customs and the Union of India. The parties have placed a number of decisions … the words of Lord Uthwatt in Wallace Brothers case [AIR 1948 PC 118] quoted in State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley and Co. [AIR 1958
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCanara Bank vs the Union of India
Karnataka
Jun-01-2026
by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks … BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … of Service Tax vs. Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd., - 2018 (10) GSTL 118 (SC);(iii) Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai vs. REPCO Home Finance Limited -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCanara Bank vs the Union of India
Karnataka
Jun-01-2026
by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks … BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … of Service Tax vs. Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd., - 2018 (10) GSTL 118 (SC);(iii) Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai vs. REPCO Home Finance Limited -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBank of Baroda vs the Union of India
Karnataka
Jun-01-2026
by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks … BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … of Service Tax vs. Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd., - 2018 (10) GSTL 118 (SC);(iii) Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai vs. REPCO Home Finance Limited -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Karnataka Bank Ltd vs the Union of India
Karnataka
Jun-01-2026
by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the petitioners - Banks … BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001.2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, -2- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE … of Service Tax vs. Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd., - 2018 (10) GSTL 118 (SC);(iii) Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai vs. REPCO Home Finance Limited -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Josco Fashion Jewellers vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Nov-13-2025
Land Acquisition
SECRETARY TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 5 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE CUSTOMS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF … Repealed through S.1741. Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 1. Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 2003 2. Kerala Finance Act, 2011 2. Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods 3. Kerala Finance Act, 2013 into Local Areas Act, 19944. … compounded rates under Section 8 of the KVAT Act. So for the assessment years (AY) 2010-2011 and 2011- 2012 and thereafter, too, the petitioner filed returns in terms of the WPC No.11335/2018 & conn.cases 20 compounding scheme-in … be an academic exercise.62[] (2015) 10 SCC 333 WPC No.11335/2018 & conn.cases 118 Limitation:167. The petitioner in one writ petition has argued thaton the date
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAgs Entertainment Private Limited Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Jun-26-2013
Land Acquisition
and proposed to exempt the Industry from service tax on Copyrights relating to recording of Cinematograph films. The Finance Act, 2012 introduced Section 66B as the new Charging Section with effect from 1.7.2012 for the levy of service tax … Petitioner vs. 1.Union of India, Secretary Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Central Board of Excise and Customs, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 3.The Commissioner of Service Tax, MHU Complex, No.692, … Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. .. Respondents W.P.No.6220 of 2012: ------------------- Balaji Theatre, 118, Kamaraj Salai, Pondicherry-605 001 rep. by its Managing Partner R.Perumal. .. Petitioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »